| Tripper |
08-17-2007 06:01 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripper
Unless youve read the book, or someone has hyped it up - I dont get how you could be disapointed by a movie like that.
Your expectations for the quality of movies must be ridiculously high. Sure it wasnt the best film ever made, but it is seriously better than the majority of movies out there.
I dont understand how people can knock things like the character development and script and then go along and happily say Transfomers was the awesomest movie ever...
|
easy, dude. i don't think it's poorly done, or have my hopes up too high. i said i like it so far, but it just disappoints me a little.
i don't like high-grossing mediocre films like Tranformers anyways. i've watched a lot of movies, and while this one is way up in a lot of categories, it just feels like it lacks to me. it's hard to explain.
|
lol i wasnt attacking you - there would be a couple more fucks n shits in there if i were
i know you're all entitled to your opinion, art is subjective and all that, but in a sea of endless shitty piss-poor films, children of men stands out as a greatly worthy film, and the fact that it wasnt over-saturated by the industry media marketing machine, and wasnt competing with the bigger films, means its already starting off as an underrated movie.
I guess thats why I dont get how people that dont have ridiculous expectations, and high standards could be "dissapointed" by it. |
