You're an idiot sometimes, ya know that? rolleyes:

From the other thread on this:

"The problem here is if you give in a little bit, there's always some asshole who's going to exploit and take advantage to your kind nature.
If I say that artful nudity is ok, then there'll invariably be some twat who'll post a guy with a bunch of radishes up his ass, saying it's art."


You KNOW that would happen. If you think otherwise, you're fooling yourself.

You need to take preventative measures like that. I agree that we do need some more active mods.

Anyway, this site has an age limit of 13, not 18. If nude images were to be the norm here, BS could get in a heap of shit for it. This is an assumption, but not an outrageous one.

Whos on aa.com more than me? rock:

Me.


and secondly this whole "give an inch, and they'll take a mile" thats such horse shit. there a direct image link button right above this text box that allows me to post anything from hardcore gay porn to nun's doing double dutch so dont give me this whole "give and inch" type crap. the majority of us around here hurt people the real way, with words. you dont see us posting pictures of old ladies (Zoner. rip off) naked with old lady pubic hair? because we like this board if not i have a feeling there would be more incidents like that.

what? If you did post that gay porn, you'd be banned in a second.

the point i was trying to get across is that NO ONE here would go to far with using nudity as art

But no one can say whats art, or whats classy.

If you say NUDITY ALLOWED, IF ITS CLASSY!
Than you can take a picture of anything, and call it classy. Determining what classy is, is an opinion. It wont work Eclipse, sorry.

Very nice piece Kemi , very tasteful and pleasing.

http://victorcharlie.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2246

i dont know anyone around here that is matrue enough to mod...

zen seems like a pretty stable guy imo.

Agreed rock:

Thanks guys ,

I have been nominated before , but I've never been asked to actually do it.

thank you zen.

this was obviously very contreversial, and started a big discussion. well i think its easy to see the difference between erotic pictures and just (as you call it) classy. i understand zoner though, what he said in judas thread.

ill take it away zoner.just wait until (what is to me) tomorrow,im on the wrong computer atm.i wanna save the upload adress.

regardless of the differences we all share the majority of us on this board are pretty straight shooters...

example: a man sitting on the ground and in the background a bit faded is a naked chick...

tastefull


example 2: a girl taking a mouthfull shadowed and manually colored in

wrong.


No one here will push the barriers without meaning to do so to in effect anger some one (the mods). Im pretty sure no one here wishes to be banned because we all seem to like this place. what it comes down to is choice, people choose to come here just as people choose to watch porn. im not saying the classic "if they dont get it here, they will just get it somewhere else argument" but there is a HUGE different between jilted lovers (one dancing erotically, partially striped) and a girl taking a mouthfull.

whats the need for the vc link????