bollox bias us games companys

BLAH

plzdie:

they should have waited one more year.

[quote=Eames]the weapons didnt look that bad, and i noticed there was no crossairs just iron sites, plus the command system is in my opinion whats going to make this game, normally having teamates is a burden like in mohaa and cod because your trying to keep them alive even though they keep doing stupid shit and stuff, being able to control your teamates makes the game alot more realistic.[/quote:369b0]

I just think most of the WWII games do such a bad job when it comes to weapon design. I think the best to date has to be some of the weapons from Day of Defeat and Red Orchestra. Great looking weapons and it makes the game feel much more realistic imo.

[url:7c951]http://www.biahq.com[/url:7c951]

is this game gonna be covered in the new aa.com site?

[quote="Maj.}{awke":eb9e8]Doesn't take much to own Call of Duty.[/quote:eb9e8]

[quote=Pyro][/quote:3cab5]

*sigh* call of duty is a great game, and the graphics are nice, especially for the framrates you get.

anyways, looks like itll be ok.

[quote=fujimi7su]*sigh* call of duty is a great game, and the graphics are nice, especially for the framrates you get.

[/quote:470b9]

oOo:

I like how theres things going on in the background, you get games like coD, and when there's a break in the fighting, you don't hear fighting going on anywhere else, except for the singleplayer. In BiA, you can see carentan being shelled to S***, and theres and AA gun shooting somewhere off in another field, it's stuff like that that makes the game better. beer:

theres mods for cod that has that

Nothing can make COD be considered a good game.

Not even if you sellotaped the game CD to a hot chick's tit?

[quote="Mr.Buttocks":2e576]Not even if you sellotaped the game CD to a hot chick's tit?[/quote:2e576]

hmm...well if you put it that way...

[quote=Pyro]hmm...well if you put it that way...[/quote:7d3a3]maybe, we'll have to test it out dance: