Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Bombs over Baghdad...erm Mosul (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=43631)

gtboys34 01-09-2005 02:44 AM

possibly... but If the targets were 'low level', why not just use ground troops?

[DAS REICH] Blitz 01-09-2005 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyMontana
MODS DELETE THE BULLSHIT PLZ


Swill 01-09-2005 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyMontana
MODS DELETE THE BULLSHIT PLZ

Yeah and this gets me more into trouble...

CoMaToSe 01-09-2005 10:30 AM

Re: Bombs over Baghdad...erm Mosul
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyMontana
a 500 pound cock to take penetrate me? oOo:

Im right here, baby

Quze 01-09-2005 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gtboys34
possibly... but If the targets were 'low level', why not just use ground troops?

less risky?

Mr.Buttocks 01-09-2005 12:50 PM

WAR CRIME

rdeyes 01-09-2005 03:18 PM

BOO F*ucking HOO !! maybe if the terrorists werent killing innocent people we wouldnt have to use a 500 lb bomb to take out a single house .

[DAS REICH] Blitz 01-09-2005 03:43 PM

[quote="Mr.Buttocks":d6fac]RAW CREIM[/quote:d6fac] ed: PS: Remove the santa hat from mugabe

Madmartagen 01-09-2005 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quzemoto
Quote:

Originally Posted by gtboys34
possibly... but If the targets were 'low level', why not just use ground troops?

less risky?

yep. low level targets dont get arrested, they get shot or blown up. you send in troops, you risk getting shot or tricked into a booby trapped house like last week. if you know theyre there, bomb em. but you should make sure you drop it on the right house too.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.