My interpretation of the rules would call that a kick, is foot was intentionally angled to direct the puck in the net ASWELL as moving towards it, no goal.

your interpretation is wrong.

cry about it.

im guessing you've never played hockey and probably dont own a pair of skates. his ankle was angled that way because thats how you stop.
im not a calgary fan btw.

it has to be a kicking motion. to me it was a stopping motion. he was stopping before the puck came to his skate.

calgary already had a fanbase, and they hardly made any money because of the old cba.

A team that can get 16,000+ out to every game after missing the playoffs for 7 years has a pretty good fanbase IMO.

And Pyro, all i'm looking for is the right call. The reffs probably made the right call in the game. it's hard to know if it was in or not. i'm not crying about it, although it seems like you do a whole bunch of whining in every topic.

his foot can be angled to deflect the puck in the net. Now if he makes a kicking motion with the skate it's disallowed, but if his skate didnt move it's a goal. but since he was in motion like that it's a tough call. i wouldn't want to be a ref at that point that's for sure

[quote=evenflow]im guessing you've never played hockey and probably dont own a pair of skates. his ankle was angled that way because thats how you stop.
im not a calgary fan btw.[/quote:a2021]
Wrong good sir, been in skates since I was 3, played organized hockey for 10 years into highschool, I live in Minnesota ffs! It was delibrately directed into the net, I feel I can make that call easily BECAUSE of my hockey experience, his stop was awkwardly executed to have his right skate in the correct place and at the correct angle.

great hockey players dont always make good coaches, they might make the playoffs.

you heard it here first

that shit was 2 years ago...try again this year

Hockey will die if Phoenix ever makes it to the finals.