Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Wallets Found in Heating Ducts (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=50356)

Arkan 01-21-2006 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
Kinda stuff middle easterners jerk off to these days, ooh look an ankle *splooge* eek:

Now THAT my friends was fuckin' funny !!

anti 01-21-2006 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tripper
Quote:

Originally Posted by John
Your uncle developed cancer some 50 years after he was exposed. My Dad had cancer a couple of times and was never exposed. My Grandma had cancer half a dozen times and was never exposed or smoked.

He said a dozen types of cancer.

Are you honestly trying to argue that exposure to Nuclear activity/radiation isn't necessarily bad for you? Because that is fucking retarded.

No he said "like a dozen cancers developed in a few years" which is nowhere near as precise as a couple of times (stomach and brain) or half a dozen ( 6 times, and I'm not going to list them).

Have you ever heard of chemotherapy. That is when they expose you to radiation to kill the cancer. So sometimes exposure to radiation is considered "good" for you, by the medical establishment.

I wasn't trying to argue any point, except maybe that we don't know what causes cancer. Claiming that some exposure 50 years ago caused the cancer isn't scientific at all, but just a guess.

What if everyone else at the same bomb site started to suffer from the same forms of cancer around the same time periods? Wouldn't it be safe to conclude that the exposure is to blame?

Madmartagen 01-21-2006 09:02 PM

ha, chemotherapy isnt that good for you. that shit makes you wish you were dead.

Tripper 01-21-2006 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anti
Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tripper
Quote:

Originally Posted by John
Your uncle developed cancer some 50 years after he was exposed. My Dad had cancer a couple of times and was never exposed. My Grandma had cancer half a dozen times and was never exposed or smoked.

He said a dozen types of cancer.

Are you honestly trying to argue that exposure to Nuclear activity/radiation isn't necessarily bad for you? Because that is fucking retarded.

No he said "like a dozen cancers developed in a few years" which is nowhere near as precise as a couple of times (stomach and brain) or half a dozen ( 6 times, and I'm not going to list them).

Have you ever heard of chemotherapy. That is when they expose you to radiation to kill the cancer. So sometimes exposure to radiation is considered "good" for you, by the medical establishment.

I wasn't trying to argue any point, except maybe that we don't know what causes cancer. Claiming that some exposure 50 years ago caused the cancer isn't scientific at all, but just a guess.

What if everyone else at the same bomb site started to suffer from the same forms of cancer around the same time periods? Wouldn't it be safe to conclude that the exposure is to blame?

That's what has been happening....

01-21-2006 09:24 PM

Chuck Norris once had 7 types of cancer, but once he flexed, they all cured themselves.

Scorched Earth 01-21-2006 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anti
Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tripper
Quote:

Originally Posted by John
Your uncle developed cancer some 50 years after he was exposed. My Dad had cancer a couple of times and was never exposed. My Grandma had cancer half a dozen times and was never exposed or smoked.

He said a dozen types of cancer.

Are you honestly trying to argue that exposure to Nuclear activity/radiation isn't necessarily bad for you? Because that is fucking retarded.

No he said "like a dozen cancers developed in a few years" which is nowhere near as precise as a couple of times (stomach and brain) or half a dozen ( 6 times, and I'm not going to list them).

Have you ever heard of chemotherapy. That is when they expose you to radiation to kill the cancer. So sometimes exposure to radiation is considered "good" for you, by the medical establishment.

I wasn't trying to argue any point, except maybe that we don't know what causes cancer. Claiming that some exposure 50 years ago caused the cancer isn't scientific at all, but just a guess.

What if everyone else at the same bomb site started to suffer from the same forms of cancer around the same time periods? Wouldn't it be safe to conclude that the exposure is to blame?



John. get a grip. A freekin atomic blast is an insanely large quantity of alpha, beta, gamma, neutron rays blasting thru ur entire body. Chemo doesnt actually involve any radiation. [url:ece4d]http://health.howstuffworks.com/cancer8.htm[/url:ece4d]
But many cancer patients also use radiation.
[url:ece4d]http://health.howstuffworks.com/cancer7.htm[/url:ece4d]
This radiation is a directed and controlled beam of radiation, not a wild blast of rays and particles.

Cpt. Obvious 01-22-2006 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
Chuck Norris once had 7 types of cancer, but once he flexed, they all cured themselves.

Chuck Norris's tears cure cancer, too bad he never cries.

Johnj 01-22-2006 12:22 AM

[quote="Scorched Earth":50610]
Quote:

Originally Posted by anti
Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tripper
Quote:

Originally Posted by John
Your uncle developed cancer some 50 years after he was exposed. My Dad had cancer a couple of times and was never exposed. My Grandma had cancer half a dozen times and was never exposed or smoked.

He said a dozen types of cancer.

Are you honestly trying to argue that exposure to Nuclear activity/radiation isn't necessarily bad for you? Because that is fucking retarded.

No he said "like a dozen cancers developed in a few years" which is nowhere near as precise as a couple of times (stomach and brain) or half a dozen ( 6 times, and I'm not going to list them).

Have you ever heard of chemotherapy. That is when they expose you to radiation to kill the cancer. So sometimes exposure to radiation is considered "good" for you, by the medical establishment.

I wasn't trying to argue any point, except maybe that we don't know what causes cancer. Claiming that some exposure 50 years ago caused the cancer isn't scientific at all, but just a guess.

What if everyone else at the same bomb site started to suffer from the same forms of cancer around the same time periods? Wouldn't it be safe to conclude that the exposure is to blame?



John. get a grip. A freekin atomic blast is an insanely large quantity of alpha, beta, gamma, neutron rays blasting thru ur entire body. Chemo doesnt actually involve any radiation. [url:50610]http://health.howstuffworks.com/cancer8.htm[/url:50610]
But many cancer patients also use radiation.
[url:50610]http://health.howstuffworks.com/cancer7.htm[/url:50610]
This radiation is a directed and controlled beam of radiation, not a wild blast of rays and particles.[/quote:50610]

Ah, what if. That's using your brain. Fact is some got sick right away, some got sick later, and some lived many years with hardly any effect at all. Other people, with no exposure at all, also get the same types of cancers as the last group. At least Scorched Earth has an argument, although it doesn't explain why some get cancer years later and some without exposure get the same types of cancers at the same age. I didn't say exposure was a good thing, I said you don't know what causes cancer.

armed.zip 01-22-2006 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bukdez
sweet find, wonder if the stuff will be published...


Unknown_Sniper 01-22-2006 05:34 PM

[quote=Johnj][quote="Scorched Earth":705b1]
Quote:

Originally Posted by anti
Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tripper
Quote:

Originally Posted by "John":705b1
Your uncle developed cancer some 50 years after he was exposed. My Dad had cancer a couple of times and was never exposed. My Grandma had cancer half a dozen times and was never exposed or smoked.

He said a dozen types of cancer.

Are you honestly trying to argue that exposure to Nuclear activity/radiation isn't necessarily bad for you? Because that is fucking retarded.

No he said "like a dozen cancers developed in a few years" which is nowhere near as precise as a couple of times (stomach and brain) or half a dozen ( 6 times, and I'm not going to list them).

Have you ever heard of chemotherapy. That is when they expose you to radiation to kill the cancer. So sometimes exposure to radiation is considered "good" for you, by the medical establishment.

I wasn't trying to argue any point, except maybe that we don't know what causes cancer. Claiming that some exposure 50 years ago caused the cancer isn't scientific at all, but just a guess.

What if everyone else at the same bomb site started to suffer from the same forms of cancer around the same time periods? Wouldn't it be safe to conclude that the exposure is to blame?



John. get a grip. A freekin atomic blast is an insanely large quantity of alpha, beta, gamma, neutron rays blasting thru ur entire body. Chemo doesnt actually involve any radiation. [url:705b1]http://health.howstuffworks.com/cancer8.htm[/url:705b1]
But many cancer patients also use radiation.
[url:705b1]http://health.howstuffworks.com/cancer7.htm[/url:705b1]
This radiation is a directed and controlled beam of radiation, not a wild blast of rays and particles.[/quote:705b1]

Ah, what if. That's using your brain. Fact is some got sick right away, some got sick later, and some lived many years with hardly any effect at all. Other people, with no exposure at all, also get the same types of cancers as the last group. At least Scorched Earth has an argument, although it doesn't explain why some get cancer years later and some without exposure get the same types of cancers at the same age. I didn't say exposure was a good thing, I said you don't know what causes cancer.[/quote:705b1]
Radiation is a huge cause of cancer. You cannot deny that. Chernobyl, A-bombs, and all the little animals they did tests on. If the soldiers didnt get cancer from the a-bombs then why is the government saying they did and paying the familes a very decent amount of money after the soldiers die? The soldiers actually got paid for having cancer. Yes he got it from the bomb, why did it take a while to develope? who knows, not I, I dont study cancer. And to elaborate, He had several different types of cancer that were cured but came back. that happend until he finally got a brain tumor and died.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.