You've 2 gig of ram though that eliminates the chuggin. cuss:

Fear kicks ass. The single player is the best i've ever seen. and the multiplayer is even really good.

I got FEAR shortly after it came out and I just realized I haven't finished single player yet. Maybe I should do that.

I thought brothers in arms was good for a console game... It was obviously a made-for-xbox game, so it can't really stand up to any other good PC game out there (as it got dumbed down when they brought it to PC). It was pretty fun though, and original/different as far as WWII shooters go (the first semi-realistic one compared to COD/MOH), though people seem to be divided 50/50 as those who like it, and those who don't.

It was worth a rent, IMO. I suggest dl'ing it first to try.

Id say FEAR

much better than the piece of shit call of duty series.

I bought FEAR, and i cant even play it. I desperatly need a new video card.

Would my 6600GT run fear ok?

Has anyone heard of the game 'Spore' ?

heres a video

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 98&q=spore

Looks pretty interesting, alot of people say it could be really amazing...

EDIT: lol @ mating scene

Yep I have that same card.

Dont fear what these homo say. You can enjoy and play a game without super fucking max settings. I played it on 1024x768 with med-high details with no slow down or chugging at all.

Well, my Radeon 9000 64Mb wouldnt play unless EVERYTHING was on low, so that meant there we no shadows, so every room looked like it had 100 lights on. Really ruined the game. cuss:

What kinda FPS do/did you get in CoD2 (Particularly a map like Brecourt)?

[quote="Jin-Roh":9cace]What kinda FPS do/did you get in CoD2 (Particularly a map like Brecourt)?[/quote:9cace]

I switched from dx9 to dx7 i think in the settings and you get a ton more fps without much loss in quality because you can pump your details up to max

I get between 80-100ish