Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   where are we on the food chain? (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=52669)

Nyck 07-31-2006 01:29 PM

[quote="Mother Earth":26126]Damn Nukka this chronic got me havin da munchies like a motha fucka! Plus I got dat wicked cotton mouth son!

/hurricane
/landslide[/quote:26126]

Coleman 07-31-2006 01:30 PM

well it does seem to me then that you feel natural disasters should be on the food chain. NATURAL DISASTERS ARE NOT CONSIDERED ALIVE. FORGET THE IDEA.

Mr.Buttocks 07-31-2006 01:43 PM

We're higher than horses, geese, and voles.

Proteus 07-31-2006 01:45 PM

Maybe there should be another chain with them on top? Wow, ease up on the thinking. oOo:

Judas 07-31-2006 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nyck
[img]http://buttonstore.com/images/ES2S1big.gif[/img]


i dont see how his ideas are igrnorant? if you read what he posted youd see that hes not saying that disease and natrual disaster are creatures, but that they may threaten our ability to sustain life. i think he was suggesting that disease and disaster could be considered to be in a place "above us on the food chain".

Blase 07-31-2006 01:54 PM

The slaughter chain

gtboys34 07-31-2006 01:54 PM

0+1=1

lol blase. i was thinking along those lines. Maybe it'll be the 'death chain' or something. Final destinatish

Coleman 07-31-2006 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nyck
[img]http://buttonstore.com/images/ES2S1big.gif[/img]


i dont see how his ideas are igrnorant? if you read what he posted youd see that hes not saying that disease and natrual disaster are creatures, but that they may threaten our ability to sustain life. i think he was suggesting that disease and disaster could be considered to be in a place "above us on the food chain".

but judas, you'd see that in order for anything on the chain to exist, it has to be alive. So what's the point in doing philosophy if you know it doesn't meet all of the criteria?

gtboys34 07-31-2006 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nyck
[img]http://buttonstore.com/images/ES2S1big.gif[/img]


i dont see how his ideas are igrnorant? if you read what he posted youd see that hes not saying that disease and natrual disaster are creatures, but that they may threaten our ability to sustain life. i think he was suggesting that disease and disaster could be considered to be in a place "above us on the food chain".

but judas, you'd see that in order for anything on the chain to exist, it has to be alive. So what's the point in doing philosophy if you know it doesn't meet all of the criteria?

i was hoping that we could all contribute to the second list more than anything. It has to atleast be considered

Judas 07-31-2006 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nyck
[img]http://buttonstore.com/images/ES2S1big.gif[/img]


i dont see how his ideas are igrnorant? if you read what he posted youd see that hes not saying that disease and natrual disaster are creatures, but that they may threaten our ability to sustain life. i think he was suggesting that disease and disaster could be considered to be in a place "above us on the food chain".

but judas, you'd see that in order for anything on the chain to exist, it has to be alive. So what's the point in doing philosophy if you know it doesn't meet all of the criteria?


Quote:

Originally Posted by gtboys34
I'm not too not sure if it's considered the "food chain" considering that the source

^.

i think he understands that.

Nyck 07-31-2006 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nyck
[img]http://buttonstore.com/images/ES2S1big.gif[/img]


i dont see how his ideas are igrnorant? if you read what he posted youd see that hes not saying that disease and natrual disaster are creatures, but that they may threaten our ability to sustain life. i think he was suggesting that disease and disaster could be considered to be in a place "above us on the food chain".

but judas, you'd see that in order for anything on the chain to exist, it has to be alive. So what's the point in doing philosophy if you know it doesn't meet all of the criteria?


Quote:

Originally Posted by gtboys34
I'm not too not sure if it's considered the "food chain" considering that the source

^.

i think he understands that.

its retarded logic or Overthinking something

Think of all the "things" that could go above us.

Walked in front of bus, bag over head while jacking off, earthquake, a bullett to the head there is no way to create a "chain" from that. its not like a double cheeseburger eats a blazing wildfire.

Zoner 07-31-2006 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blase
The slaughter chain

That'sa good name for a band/album. rock:

gtboys34 07-31-2006 02:16 PM

[quote=Nyck]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Nyck":ca2d4
[img]http://buttonstore.com/images/ES2S1big.gif[/img]


i dont see how his ideas are igrnorant? if you read what he posted youd see that hes not saying that disease and natrual disaster are creatures, but that they may threaten our ability to sustain life. i think he was suggesting that disease and disaster could be considered to be in a place "above us on the food chain".

but judas, you'd see that in order for anything on the chain to exist, it has to be alive. So what's the point in doing philosophy if you know it doesn't meet all of the criteria?


Quote:

Originally Posted by gtboys34
I'm not too not sure if it's considered the "food chain" considering that the source

^.

i think he understands that.

its retarded logic or Overthinking something

Think of all the "things" that could go above us.

Walked in front of bus, bag over head while jacking off, earthquake, a bullett to the head there is no way to create a "chain" from that. its not like a double cheeseburger eats a blazing wildfire.[/quote:ca2d4]yeah. i didn't want to include all of that in my first post just so i wouldn't hinder the "progression" of the thread. But when i think of the second chain, it does has to do more with the path of death more than anything. If i wouldn't have placed "food chain" in the title, i think you guys would be a little more openminded about the topic at hand. Thanks to all who are though.

Arch 07-31-2006 02:56 PM

rofl, GED fails another again annoy: happy: happy: happy:

Tripper 07-31-2006 02:58 PM

It wouldn't be a chain so much as a list of the top things that kill humanity.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.