[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":338d6][quote=anti]you guys are so cute together, goodluck to you both beer:[/quote:338d6]yeh our next dates in an abandoned warehouse, were gonna take pics[/quote:338d6]

explain to me what's wrong with photography?

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":bc6ee][quote=anti]you guys are so cute together, goodluck to you both beer:[/quote:bc6ee]yeh our next dates in an abandoned warehouse, were gonna take pics[/quote:bc6ee]Don't you have dead people to make fun of?

Fucking faggot.

Yeah man, fuckin faggot he says, you fuckin faggot.

calmdown: Blitz go get a talent that isn't pleasurable to a man.

[quote=anti][quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":2689b]yeh our next dates in an abandoned warehouse, were gonna take pics[/quote:2689b]

explain to me what's wrong with photography?[/quote:2689b]

I'm with anti on this one, there's nothing wrong with photography, and borders actually do make photos look better.

lol that was fucking awsome

Fuck my DSL, I've been watching it for the last 15 minutes and I JUST got to the part where he pulls the gun because of buffering.

there is nothing wrong with it IMO anti has a 1337 skill in photography and can do some amazing things.

but now every single person here goes out, takes a picture of some random object, slaps a border on it and presto Im a 1337 photographer.

Its like everyone is stealing the same method as anti and just copying it.

Try some other things(for instance the infared that anti took is sweet)

enough of take a macro image of said random object(pennies, lint, flower, bug, rusted coat hanger) slap a border on it and ta-da its art.

come up with some new methods/angles/objects

A sub-par photo is still a sub-par photo even if it has a border on it. If you feel otherwise I don't think that's any fault of the photographer but more your own. oOo:

And adding borders isn't an anti patented photo technique, it's been used by almost every successful art photographer that I've researched. When I went to the Jay Paul Getty museum almost every photo in their art photography section had borders. Really the only photographs that I've seen that don't have borders are people who don't know about borders and photo-journalism.

I'm not saying borders are copywrite anti. I don't even have a problem with the borders, Ive just said it to get a rise out of him. That being said look at the 1st 7 or 8 pages of the photo thread and there are a lot of just pure photos, image taken, uploaded, then posted. Then suddenly everyone started putting a border on any image they took, just became tepid along with the subject manner.

[quote=Whatada][quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":b69fd]yeh our next dates in an abandoned warehouse, were gonna take pics[/quote:b69fd]Don't you have dead people to make fun of?

Fucking faggot.[/quote:b69fd]hes still dead adn your still teh ghey oOo: go back to the hole from whence you came from needledick

They teach you to put those kinds of borders round your images in photography classes, etc...I know because two of my buddies do photography as part of their design/art & design courses at university. It's a technique so common its like having a heading on a written document, or signing your name at the bottom of a document, or like saying:

P.s blitz you suck so much fucking daddycock that you're destined to repeat the abusive cycle to some young child whose babypenis you will feast on. Go prey on small children and then get arrested you friendless fuck.

oOo:

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":44aa3]oOo:[/quote:44aa3] oOo: is god damn right you fuckin leb.

staged?