Alliedassault
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Politics, Current Events & History (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   Clinton Vs Fox News (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=53315)

Colonel 10-07-2006 08:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stammer
Yeah, but at least thousands of people didn't die because of Clintons "disgraces".
Unless you consider that since he didn't handle the problem during his administration that the price to handle it today was higher. If he had aggressively dealt with the problem after they tried to bomb the WTC the first time (and several other such events during his term) we wouldn't be where we are today. But he was having too much fun playing at being president to actually make the tough decisions that come with the office.

Sgt>Stackem 10-09-2006 07:40 AM
the toughest decision Clinton ever made was to marry that bitch Hillary

1080jibber 10-09-2006 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stammer
Yeah, but at least thousands of people didn't die because of Clintons "disgraces".
Unless you consider that since he didn't handle the problem during his administration that the price to handle it today was higher. If he had aggressively dealt with the problem after they tried to bomb the WTC the first time (and several other such events during his term) we wouldn't be where we are today. But he was having too much fun playing at being president to actually make the tough decisions that come with the office.
so how did Bush aggressively deal with the problem? Oh yeah, Iraq oOo:

Colonel 10-09-2006 01:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1080jibber
...so how did Bush aggressively deal with the problem? Oh yeah, Iraq
... and Afghanistan ... and the thousands of known terrorists that have been rounded up worldwide. Still, he could have done more.

elstatec 10-10-2006 03:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1080jibber
...so how did Bush aggressively deal with the problem? Oh yeah, Iraq
... and Afghanistan ... and the thousands of known terrorists that have been rounded up worldwide. Still, he could have done more.

afganistan and Iraq were not for the war on terror or so the excuse would seem, they were for profit for alot of companies.

Colonel 10-10-2006 07:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
.... afganistan and Iraq were not for the war on terror or so the excuse would seem, they were for profit for alot of companies.
You are kidding right?

Madmartagen 10-10-2006 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stammer
Yeah, but at least thousands of people didn't die because of Clintons "disgraces".
Unless you consider that since he didn't handle the problem during his administration that the price to handle it today was higher. If he had aggressively dealt with the problem after they tried to bomb the WTC the first time (and several other such events during his term) we wouldn't be where we are today. But he was having too much fun playing at being president to actually make the tough decisions that come with the office.
i believe some of those responsible for WTC attack in 93 were prosecuted and sent to prison - all in clintons term and fairly quickly.

Simo Häyhä 10-10-2006 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1080jibber
...so how did Bush aggressively deal with the problem? Oh yeah, Iraq
... and Afghanistan ... and the thousands of known terrorists that have been rounded up worldwide. Still, he could have done more.

afganistan and Iraq were not for the war on terror or so the excuse would seem, they were for profit for alot of companies.
as each day goes by I am more inclined to believe this

elstatec 10-14-2006 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
.... afganistan and Iraq were not for the war on terror or so the excuse would seem, they were for profit for alot of companies.
You are kidding right?
No.

Colonel 10-14-2006 08:37 PM
Then you are grossly misinformed.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.