yeh fuck people who bring justice oOo:

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":ac778]yeh fuck people who bring justice oOo:[/quote:ac778]
no, fuck haggard old bitches


and fuck blitz that scab eating chode

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":8a1f5]oOo:[/quote:8a1f5]

thought that was more of an appropriate response.

dont lower your standards, blitz.

bitch got what she deserved. 5k for being a fucking cunt.

what the shit...c unt is censored?

c unit word up nigga

Already brought this travesty of censoring up in the mods forum, needs to be restored asap. cuss:

i don't like Judge Judy either...can't Nyck post some American Chopper or something..? mad:

whos dat scamminnn

PATRICK SWAYZE

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":012fc]yeh fuck people who bring justice oOo:[/quote:012fc]

you're a fucking tool. do you need see the faults of judge judy? the fact that she lets her emotions and ego get the best of her to the point where she is doing a poor job at being a judge?

[quote=anti]you're a fucking tool. do you need see the faults of judge judy? the fact that she lets her emotions and ego get the best of her to the point where she is doing a poor job at being a judge?[/quote:ecada]
emotions and ego getting in the way? where did you attend law school? she is animated, but makes fair decisions... where would you cite a poor decision from her emotions and ego?

i've stopped on the show several times to see that she's in an automatic bias against the defendant. you can't deny that is true from what you've just seen in that video.i mean, come on, she has the audacity to start making personal attacks against the wife's husband, what kind of fucking judge is that and why is that relevant? aside from that, she wouldn't let the defendant get in their side of the story which is what really bothers me. i don't care how wrong they may be, or how much bullshit they are spewing; you don't assume the full story. you work with what you are given with from both sides. she may be right in her hearings, but you have to accept that there's a fault in listening to one side of the story. i've seen her bullshit clutter up the trial many times for the sake of theatre. i would imagine a judge walks into a trial with an open mind ready to hear both sides of the story to make a balanced judgement (hence the name A JUDGE). a judge isn't supposed to be some stuck up bitch ready to please her t.v. audience but i guess this is just a t.v. show. i'm just defending my criticisms of her as a judge when i should be seeing her as an actor. attend law school? come on juju, let's not start making facetious statements here.

LOL

nail, head

you can't start comparing some TV judge, who is meant to entertain and get ratings overall to actual respectable judges who make important decisions.. and don't just settle petty disputes for the sake of TV drama

she can die

Lets try this.... Buttocks is getting accused of killing Swill with a gun. The accuser has a video of Buttocks firing the gun and killing Swill. They give it to the judge and the judge looks at it and sees Buttocks pulling the trigger. The evidence has been provided and obviously tells taht Buttocks is a murderer. do you think there is the need to hear Buttock's side?

well yeah, we have to know the motive, which is obvious, but you know

exactly what im saying,
she is very animated, great for TV... she is on the air and encouraged to go on those rants because of it. being under so much scrutiny, she would have lost her license years ago if the state felt her emotional rants etc for TV are unfair to the decision.

You would have to know the motive to determine his punishment (jail time, death penatly, etc..) not if he is innocent or not.