Second thought... they should make a MOH game where you play as the Germans and the Allies.. be pretty sweet

------------------
http://3rdInfantry.homestead.com/fil.../Captblade.jpg

First time poster here. I love the idea of a story wrapped around the 101st Airborne. Just the idea of one mission being about 'A Bridge to Far' (Arnhem) would be thrilling. Although it ended in defeat for the Allies, the battle would make an excellent addon or sequel.

I found the ingame graphics of the omaha landing to be great, so it would be interesting to see their skills put to the test watching hundreds of paratroopers drop out of planes in the night.

Anyway just my two cents.


soul.

Welcome soul http://www.pcgamers.net/ubb/smile.gif hope ya have fun here. Yes just the very though of playing a Paratrooper is very exciting. I'm hoping EA/2015 take this seriously, it would be the first game to portray a first person view point of Airborne Opertions in WW2. It would be unbelievable.

------------------
http://www.usmedals.com/prodpix/p295.jpg
Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teacheth my hands to War and my fingers to fight.

Oh yeah, Flak exploding all around you, planes being shot out of the sky...It would be quite extra-ordainary http://www.pcgamers.net/ubb/smile.gif

Medal of Honor was orriginally devised by Spielberg after SPR, What about a Band of Brothers type game ? http://www.pcgamers.net/ubb/smile.gif

Kaiser - I dunno if I fully agree with your synopsis of Stalingrad being the major turning point in the war. Sure the Nazi's didn't win any major battles afterwards, but I think you totally have to consider that could be because they were then fighting a two front war. Fighting on the western front in France against the Allies tends to deplete resources that they could put on the eastern front (in fact, the Nazi's had to pull away resources to go to the western front, from the eastern front if I'm not mistaken).

So yes you could say Stalingrad was a major turning point in the war, but I think in turn because the Allies invaded and gave the Nazi's another front to take care of.

Just my 2 cents worth :)

But yeah a game on the Russian front would be very interesting :).

------------------
-----------------------
Latuh fuh U,
Benson
benson@2015.com

"We don't introduce or cause bugs in the game, we merely find and bring to light the inadequacies within the code."
-regarding level designers

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by elmagoo:
Kaiser - I dunno if I fully agree with your synopsis of Stalingrad being the major turning point in the war. Sure the Nazi's didn't win any major battles afterwards, but I think you totally have to consider that could be because they were then fighting a two front war. Fighting on the western front in France against the Allies tends to deplete resources that they could put on the eastern front (in fact, the Nazi's had to pull away resources to go to the western front, from the eastern front if I'm not mistaken).

So yes you could say Stalingrad was a major turning point in the war, but I think in turn because the Allies invaded and gave the Nazi's another front to take care of.

Just my 2 cents worth http://www.pcgamers.net/ubb/smile.gif

But yeah a game on the Russian front would be very interesting http://www.pcgamers.net/ubb/smile.gif.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I rest my case

------------------
http://3rdInfantry.homestead.com/fil.../Captblade.jpg

i think a WW1 game would kick ass for a medal of honor 2, i mean, trench warfare, what can beat that??? ive said something like this earlier where it can just a multiplayer game, like counterstrike or tribes, think about it, it could be cool

If you guys really think about it.. Russians killed more Germans then Americans did.. And my synopsis was the exact words of my Modern Wrld Hist teacher(not that it makes it right)
I mean if you ask many Historians the russians practically won the war, they killed the most.. And look at Russian tanks, they were legendary, im juss saying i wanna Russian game cuzz i luv Russians

shut ur fuckin mouth Blade, yes i DO know the winter killed germans, hitler never learned from Napoleans idiotic mistake.. But hell yah the russians did a lot more.. Read wut Partisan just said, and stop being sucha Patriotic american peice of shit

Ya it could be, but why not throw in a single player campaign Lucky? Anyone ever played Falcon 4? I know it is off topic, but who else loves that campaign system. Best campaign in the world of gaming. It is so realistic. I wish they could make a simulation FPS campaign game like that for some game.

A russian ww2 game eh?
Hmmm, it does sound fun. I do agree the russians stallingrad was as important as the americans omaha beach. Now what is the subtitle of this game again, ALLIED ASSAUL?
If an alied assault it is then the russians are part of it. Do we get to see soldiers besides americans in this game? I mean weres all the British the english the australians the french and russians? they were all allies at the time.

I agree with Kaiser, Russians were those that won the war, especially after the Kursk and Stalingrad.

emalgoo: germans had about 250 divisions on Eastern Front and about 56 on Western. So they concetrated almost fully on eastern front. Hence when those 250 divisons in east were defeated, that was the point at which Germany lost the war, as well as confirmation that Russia was one nation that took full brunt of the war and was the nation that contributed mostly to defeat of Germany.

This was my 2 cents worth.

------------------
"Sloboda ili smrt" ( Death or freedom)

Guys chill out. There is nothing wrong with being patriotic. And either you agree or disagree that the russians did more. I happen to agree with Blade, and I think that the United states played an equal if not more important role then the Russians did.

i smell a mod