Alliedassault - Iraq's Saddam Says He Is Unmoved by U.S. Threats

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)

- Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)

- - Iraq's Saddam Says He Is Unmoved by U.S. Threats (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=6357)

[quote="Bean 2":8f14d]And if Bush doesnt attack(which i highly doubt), Blair will. And he'll talk Bush into attacking anyway. Saddams not scared.....HAhhahahahahahahahahaahahahah. I bet hes shitting in his pants right now hiding in the same bunker as Osamas rotting corpse.[/quote:8f14d]

lol. Mate, Blair is too busy having his own country telling him they don't want to take part. Our troops have been pulled out of Afghanistian, while the population grows more and more fed up with the gung-ho approach that the Bushs seem to take.

Besides which, if I was in Saddam's position I certainly wouldn't be worried. Even the US's closest allies, including key Arabic nations, are refusing to take part. The scary thing is that there is talk in the US, even if it is by a minority, of taking control of Saudi Arabia.

As for bin Laden... you think he's dead? More importantly, do you think it matters whether he is? bin Laden was a face the western media placed to an invisible army, a huge army of people ready, and eager, to die.

Hey i support invading iraq saddam needs to be killed and his son wich they say would bring even more hell to the world i mean lots! but anyway WW2...the germans purposley taargeted innocents cuz they werent perfect :roll: saddam and bin laden hate the US just Saddam owns a country so it's harder to send trroops there....are they really pulling our troops out of afganistan? if so Bush is a weiny i voted for him yes but we need Bin laden dead and to back off omg! :evil:

Ummm....Low spark i guess you forgot the fact the 9/11 even took place? HELLO!!! Saddam is a terrorist and if you want to but the blame on anyone for killing innocent people its him. Now lets think about this for a sec.....if you know that Saddam is a terrorist and therefore he could attack the U.S.A., a country which i love and would die for(i shit you not), would you want to a innocent caught in the middle cause you were too stubborn to realize that terrorism is a real threat. I know i personally wouldn't...me or any of my loved ones. We defend what is ours because we want to live the American life. You never know how much you miss something til its gone so dont take America for granted. We stand for whats right in this world!!!

cRaZyDuCk

[quote=FWB]

Quote:

Originally Posted by "Bean 2":ecdbb

And if Bush doesnt attack(which i highly doubt), Blair will. And he'll talk Bush into attacking anyway. Saddams not scared.....HAhhahahahahahahahahaahahahah. I bet hes shitting in his pants right now hiding in the same bunker as Osamas rotting corpse.

lol. Mate, Blair is too busy having his own country telling him they don't want to take part. Our troops have been pulled out of Afghanistian, while the population grows more and more fed up with the gung-ho approach that the Bushs seem to take.

Besides which, if I was in Saddam's position I certainly wouldn't be worried. Even the US's closest allies, including key Arabic nations, are refusing to take part. The scary thing is that there is talk in the US, even if it is by a minority, of taking control of Saudi Arabia.

As for bin Laden... you think he's dead? More importantly, do you think it matters whether he is? bin Laden was a face the western media placed to an invisible army, a huge army of people ready, and eager, to die.[/quote:ecdbb]

Blair doesnt care what anybody thinks. Hes like the big bully at school who wants to kick the crap outta everybody. Thats what i like about him. Hes eager to fight and he knows how powerful Britian and the US are. And trust me we dont need key Arabic nations helping us in this war. And who does Saddam have left to fight his war? The Republican guard.... They didnt do that much damage last time. And of course it doesnt matter if bin ladens dead or not. Well in some cases it does because the civilian population in the US wants to fight somebody. Somebody has to be the bad guy. Osama is that bad guy. With him dead the population will think that the war is over and will want there husbands and sons to come back home. The average american doesnt realize or doesnt care that there is a whole bunch of strong leaders besides Osama and killing him wont make a difference.

[quote="Low spark":0589a]It is wrong, It makes the US no better than any other imperialistic country.[/quote:0589a]

Its wrong in your mind, most of the country wants Saddam gone. Oh and FWB nice triple post.

I love you all :lol:

[quote="Low spark":c432e]Sorry to rain on the parade, I don't like Saddam, but I don't think the US can really justify invading Iraq. The logic of "he may have or may be devoloping weapon of mass destruction" just doesn't fly. Should we invade China first, they are a bigger threat than Iraq. Mabye we should invade Russia, to make sure all their nukes and biological weopons are destroyed. Just because Cheney and Pappa Bush have a personal vendetta, is no reason to start a war. The reasoning I'm hearing from Washington, says to me, someone ought to invade the US and replace Cheney/Bush because they have access to nukes and bio weopons. I strongly suggest that people step back and think it through. War is wrong, and killing innocent people because you want to prove you have a bigger dick than someone else is stupid.

I know that you all think I'm wrong, but somebody has to speak out against this kind of thing, I am an American, I and I am proud of what Amerca stands for, I don't want to see America become a state that uses its military to "remove" whomever, they don't happen to like at the time, from power.[/quote:c432e]

You seem to have missed the point entirely. Yes, war is a terrible thing, I have no problem saying this as it is true. But does Saddam need to be removed from power ? Your goddamn right he does. Look at his track record, the guy is a prick, he's a not a fucking cuddly teddy bear. He used kids as human shields in the Gulf War, does that deserve a bullet to the head ? I think so.

Where the hell did you get this "kill innocent people" shit from ?? We never said we wanted innocent people killed. I, personally, want Saddam and his regime ended. He has the power the means and the equipment to launch nuclear, biological and chemical weapons on any country he wants. Do you not think that is a serious problem ?? He wont comply with Weapons Inspectors, he never has and you would have him stay in power, a man who tested chemical weapons on prisoners of war and civilians alike, a man who used children as shields, a man who uses fear to control his population ??

Yes Bush and Cheney have nuclear weapons at their disposal, but they are not fuckheaded enough to use them on a population which would spur on a possible WW3. I dont think they have a personal vendetta, why do you think that ? Saddam supports terrorism, he funds it, and so does Saudi Arabia, Saddam has some of the most deadliest weapons this world has ever seen. THAT seems like reason enough to take him from power. But if you want a madman to stay in power over their who could launch a biological (anthrax, ebola) chemical (sarin, Hydrogen cyanide) or nuclear (I dont think I need to point out the devatation of this weapon) then fine by me, but you and the rest of the "no war in Iraq" people be the first I point the blame on when Saddam does finally start launching weapons indiscriminately.