[quote="Captain Noctis Aeternus":55347]

And Gore would have been better?

*planes hit*

Okay guys, seriously, let's settle down now. We'll just forget about this whole silly mess and work out social security instead!

God damned fucking liberals. M16:[/quote:55347]

Amen.

who knows, if Gore was president...it may of never happened...

haha yeah right....actually I'd rather have clinton in office

[quote="Old Reliable":1d79f]haha yeah right....actually I'd rather have clinton in office[/quote:1d79f]

He'd launch a cruise missle at a hotel, and then go back to his interns... Oh and PyrO it would have still happend Al queda was attacking U.S. targets all through out Clintons term, and was most likely planning 9/11 a year or two before it happend.

maybe their motives were that they wnated a democrat in office

some people have weird agendas.

I would be mighty pissed if someone started calling me the "Axis of Evil".

What I don't understand is why they are not allowed to build up nuclear weapons. Every country has a couple. For self-defence. The idea is "Guaranteed Total Destruction." It works like this:

"Let's bomb their ass!"
"I don't know. They have a lot of bombs themselves."
"Oh really? Fuck that then."

North Korea should be allowed some nuclear missles. If they use a couple, then it is alright to get mad and wage war.

[quote="Pfc.Green":60a8a][quote="Old Reliable":60a8a]haha yeah right....actually I'd rather have clinton in office[/quote:60a8a]

He'd launch a cruise missle at a hotel, and then go back to his interns... Oh and PyrO it would have still happend Al queda was attacking U.S. targets all through out Clintons term, and was most likely planning 9/11 a year or two before it happend.[/quote:60a8a]

thats an uneducated answer

the us is nato's police. we are the police of the world

no we are the forest agency of the world

Yeah, if Bush was president and North Koea attacked the U.S. with nuclear warheads, Bush would attack Iraq. Ohh wait... see, I can pull statements out of my ass too, Green.

Why are'nt they allowed to Dahg Rastubfari? Well because about 40 some years ago they tried to take over their southern brother and did not succed yet the war did not officially end, there was only an armistice which exists today, so we and the U.N. dont want them to use nukes against S. Korea or anyone else. They dont want them for defense, they want them for extortion, to get money, and food, and other essentials which they wont try and get themselves because they only spend money on the military.

[quote="Recycled Spooge":96b02]Yeah, if Bush was president and North Koea attacked the U.S. with nuclear warheads, Bush would attack Iraq. Ohh wait... see, I can pull statements out of my ass too, Green.[/quote:96b02]

Yes you can....but mine have a bit of validity to them.

yes

[quote="Pfc.Green":659e5]Why are'nt they allowed to Dahg Rastubfari? Well because about 40 some years ago they tried to take over their southern brother and did not succed yet the war did not officially end, there was only an armistice which exists today, so we and the U.N. dont want them to use nukes against S. Korea or anyone else. They dont want them for defense, they want them for extortion, to get money, and food, and other essentials which they wont try and get themselves because they only spend money on the military.[/quote:659e5]
Who cares! We're focusing on Iraq!

It seems Bush is trying to make it so whatever he says, in americas eyes, should be the right thing everytime.

[quote="Pfc.Green":74675][quote="Recycled Spooge":74675]Yeah, if Bush was president and North Koea attacked the U.S. with nuclear warheads, Bush would attack Iraq. Ohh wait... see, I can pull statements out of my ass too, Green.[/quote:74675]

Yes you can....but mine have a bit of validity to them.[/quote:74675]
Please site your references, or provide links to webpages which actually "validize" your claims on a scientific basis.

[quote="Recycled Spooge":1eea1]Who cares! We're focusing on Iraq![/quote:1eea1]

The two situations are very different in the way in which they need to be handled.

Clinton fired cruise missles into an asprin factory as a response to a terrorist act, thus I used a hotel in my statement because it poses about as much of a threat.

[quote="Pfc.Green":a3962][quote="Recycled Spooge":a3962]Who cares! We're focusing on Iraq![/quote:a3962]

The two situations are very different in the way in which they need to be handled.[/quote:a3962]
Oh please share with us these solutions, since you seem to be the grand wizard of foreign affairs, and you have all the solutions to the world's problems. Maybe you could halp cure cancer? No wait, we have to buy a dozen B2's instead to attack a country that can't even hit the U.S. with a lump of coal with the missile technology it has at the moment.

[quote="Pfc.Green":e5dc3]Well now, we have Osama Bin Laden and NORTH KOREA, and we're attacking Iraq. Hmmmmm..

[quote="Recycled Spooge":8507d]No wait, we have to buy a dozen B2's instead to attack a country that can't even hit the U.S. with a lump of coal with the missile technology it has at the moment.[/quote:8507d]

Which is exactly why they're being dealt with first, Spooge. Because they can't hit us back yet.

N. Korea, however, can.. so dealing with them is a bit more tricky.

One country is suspected of having nukes, the other wants to build them.

How would you deal with this issue? I just wouldn't start out negotiations saying, "Hey you peanut-dicked cocksucker, this is what's going to happen..."

This approach is only useful while talking to your kids.

Geez did'nt get any tonight? If you cant already see that they need to be handled differently, then I cant help you. But if you want to see anything about the different solutions...turn on the news once and awhile.

[quote="Captain Noctis Aeternus":d314e][quote="Recycled Spooge":d314e]No wait, we have to buy a dozen B2's instead to attack a country that can't even hit the U.S. with a lump of coal with the missile technology it has at the moment.[/quote:d314e]

Which is exactly why they're being dealt with first, Spooge. Because they can't hit us back yet.

N. Korea, however, can.. so dealing with them is a bit more tricky.[/quote:d314e]

And why are we invading Iraq, and since when did Iraq want to attack the U.S.?

[quote="Dahg Rastubfari":2eaa3]One country is suspected of having nukes, the other wants to build them.

How would you deal with this issue? I just wouldn't start out negotiations saying, "Hey you peanut-dicked cocksucker, this is what's going to happen..."

This approach is only useful while talking to your kids.[/quote:2eaa3]


What the fuck?

[quote="Pfc.Green":b3f60]So you weren't able to reply to my question in ameaningful fasion. Thought so.

wait but isnt it suppose to be once in a while?

Iraq has ALWAYS been a problem the last 10 years. We should of thrown his ass out of power the day he decided to step foot in Kuwait.

Now we're dealing with problems we never wanted to deal with, AKA Clinton's stupidity in his 8 years as president.

Iraq IS a threat. I have no doubt in my mind that they are harboring and funding terroists, and tell me, what is the current goal of the US right now?? YES, to eliminate terroisism.

You fucking liberals will negotiate until nukes start flying... god damn pussies.

[quote="Recycled Spooge":5159b]So you weren't able to reply to my question in ameaningful fasion. Thought so.[/quote:5159b]

Oh I could, however its late and I don't feel like typing two or three paragraphs on the subject.

[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":7bb68]
Iraq IS a threat. I have no doubt in my mind that they are harboring and funding terroists, and tell me, what is the current goal of the US right now?? [/quote:7bb68]
Obviously, that is the truth... Saudi Arabia is doing the same thing. Attack them.

I liked clinton

I don't think Iraq is stupid enough to want to do anything with America, I just think they want to be left alone, but everyone seems ot want ot get int heir business.

[quote="Pfc.Green":daf20][quote="Recycled Spooge":daf20]So you weren't able to reply to my question in ameaningful fasion. Thought so.[/quote:daf20]

Oh I could, however its late and I don't feel like typing two or three paragraphs on the subject.[/quote:daf20]
A damn shame indeed.

[quote="Recycled Spooge":2e4d5]
Obviously, that is the truth... Saudi Arabia is doing the same thing. Attack them.[/quote:2e4d5]

Actually I agree, are 'alliance' with the Saudis is one of the things I totally disagree with Bush on.

Poor, poor Saddam and his cohorts...I mean their such a good 'ol bunch.

[quote="Pfc.Green":3e429][quote="Recycled Spooge":3e429]
Obviously, that is the truth... Saudi Arabia is doing the same thing. Attack them.[/quote:3e429]

Actually I agree, are 'alliance' with the Saudis is one of the things I totally disagree with Bush on.[/quote:3e429]

omg you said DISAGREE with bush

you on crack? you must be.

saudi is so troubled and weak.

[quote="Recycled Spooge":eaf95][quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":eaf95]
Iraq IS a threat. I have no doubt in my mind that they are harboring and funding terroists, and tell me, what is the current goal of the US right now?? [/quote:eaf95]
Obviously, that is the truth... Saudi Arabia is doing the same thing. Attack them.[/quote:eaf95]

Spooge, if you had any commen sense you'd realise that Bush is taking it step by step.

We're not going to invade 3 to 4 places at once, spreading out our forces... I thought you knew SIMPLE military tactics!?

Everyone was bitching about Terroism NOT being taken care of the last 20 years. Now that we are doing something about it, people are bitching we should stop and 'bring peace'.

All we really know is what the media tells us. From that, we conceive our own interpretations. The Iraqis call themselves a "Socialist" republic, and consider American administration "Evil".

Hey, that's right! Iraqis have their own propaganda as well! And I'd bet it works just as well as our own. Because if it didn't nobody would be arguing over what they believe is right.

[quote="Dahg Rastubfari":c72d8]All we really know is what the media tells us. From that, we conceive our own interpretations. The Iraqis call themselves a "Socialist" republic, and consider American administration "Evil".

Hey, that's right! Iraqis have their own propaganda as well! And I'd bet it works just as well as our own. Because if it didn't nobody would be arguing over what they believe is right.[/quote:c72d8]

Iraq has their own propoganda...really????!?!?!?!?

[quote=Pyro][quote="Pfc.Green":6d436]Actually I agree, are 'alliance' with the Saudis is one of the things I totally disagree with Bush on.[/quote:6d436]

omg you said DISAGREE with bush

you on crack? you must be.[/quote:6d436]
It's a festivus miracle!! Well, since I made Green disagree with Bush, I call this debate a victory for the spooge. Later guys.;)