Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   whos is the greater threat to world peace? (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=20292)

03-05-2003 12:31 AM

THE ANSWER
 
id have to say none of the above...my vote goes this forum. imagine some of these guys in charge of nukes. DUCK AND COVER.

Innoxx 03-05-2003 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vance1
I will remove it when Superman/Scrotum stop the America flaming oOo:

C'mon Vance, I thought you were better than that?

Oh, and this is not a flame American thread.

BallisticWookie 03-05-2003 02:13 AM

The USA the greatest threat ? You people fucking shit me.

Innoxx 03-05-2003 02:28 AM

Well, who else do you think?

On Scrotum's list USA is more of a threat. Now, if China, Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were on there....... that would be a different matter.

Tripper 03-05-2003 02:48 AM

[quote="GreenEggs&Pot":c30b0]I think Tripper is 10x for dangerous than Iraq...[/quote:c30b0]

WTF.........?

You just defined 'Random.'

Sergeant_Scrotum 03-05-2003 07:30 AM

come on guys i only had so many slots i could fill. i cant make a list with every single fucking country.

Vance 03-05-2003 07:38 AM

You could of done more than 4

BallisticWookie 03-05-2003 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innoxx
Well, who else do you think?

On Scrotum's list USA is more of a threat. Now, if China, Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were on there....... that would be a different matter.

More of a threat to WHO ?!? You, me ?? Dont be stupid. Think about it a little harder. Yes, the US has made some pretty stupid moves over the years, but they are NOT a threat to any of us. The only people threatened by the US, and for good reason, are those that are up to no good. Iraq, NK., perhaps even China.

White Rabbit 03-05-2003 10:06 AM

the usa is a greater threat.......to world terrorists

Sergeant_Scrotum 03-05-2003 10:17 AM

can mods edit in more choices?

Sergeant_Scrotum 03-05-2003 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vance1
Wait I meant

Scrotm/Superman = teh suck

why did you call me superman? i still cant figure it out.

BallisticWookie 03-05-2003 10:21 AM

[quote="Sargent_Scrotum":455d4]can mods edit in more choices?[/quote:455d4]

Yeah I can, but I think I'll just leave it as it is to get a laugh out of your stupidity....USA...what the fuck were you thinking ? Wait, I think I will edit it, and take out the US, hows that sound ?? Please elaborate on your choice of the United States as a threat. I mean, whom are they a threat too ??

White Rabbit 03-05-2003 10:24 AM

[quote:efc0b]Please elaborate on your choice of the United States as a threat. I mean, whom are they a threat too ??[/quote:efc0b]

sadaam

03-05-2003 10:26 AM

[quote="Sargent_Scrotum":f4ec4]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vance1
Wait I meant

Scrotm/Superman = teh suck

why did you call me superman? i still cant figure it out.[/quote:f4ec4]

there talking about me the "anti-american"

imported_Fluffy_Bunny 03-05-2003 10:27 AM

You say USA is a threat without really thinking about what they have done in the 20thC.

What would happen if the USA wasn't here for the following:

World War 1
World War 2
Korea
Gulf
Bosnia
Kosovo

The only countries that are capable of stopping aggression and actually have the balls to stick up for what is morally right are the Anglo Saxon speaking ones, USA,UK,Canada,Australia etc.

Do you think Egypt would have stopped Saddam Hussein taking over Kuwait?
Do you think Italy/France/Germany would have stopped the Kosovo crisis?

And you think the USA is a threat, roflmao.

BallisticWookie 03-05-2003 10:39 AM

[quote="White Rabbit":b85a9][quote:b85a9]Please elaborate on your choice of the United States as a threat. I mean, whom are they a threat too ??[/quote:b85a9]

sadaam[/quote:b85a9]

You're on a roll dude. Thats 2 correct questions. Good work. biggrin:

BallisticWookie 03-05-2003 10:40 AM

[quote="Fluffy_Bunny":978c6]You say USA is a threat without really thinking about what they have done in the 20thC.

What would happen if the USA wasn't here for the following:

World War 1
World War 2
Korea
Gulf
Bosnia
Kosovo

The only countries that are capable of stopping aggression and actually have the balls to stick up for what is morally right are the Anglo Saxon speaking ones, USA,UK,Canada,Australia etc.

Do you think Egypt would have stopped Saddam Hussein taking over Kuwait?
Do you think Italy/France/Germany would have stopped the Kosovo crisis?

And you think the USA is a threat, roflmao.[/quote:978c6]

For once, I'm in total agreement with you.

White Rabbit 03-05-2003 10:42 AM

[quote=BallisticWookie]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "White Rabbit":4794d
[quote:4794d]Please elaborate on your choice of the United States as a threat. I mean, whom are they a threat too ??

sadaam[/quote:4794d]

You're on a roll dude. Thats 2 correct questions. Good work. biggrin:[/quote:4794d]

do i get a cookie

BallisticWookie 03-05-2003 10:44 AM

[quote="White Rabbit":f527b][quote=BallisticWookie]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "White Rabbit":f527b
[quote:f527b]Please elaborate on your choice of the United States as a threat. I mean, whom are they a threat too ??

sadaam[/quote:f527b]

You're on a roll dude. Thats 2 correct questions. Good work. biggrin:[/quote:f527b]

do i get a cookie[/quote:f527b]

You certainly do.... *cookie*

03-05-2003 10:49 AM

[quote="Fluffy_Bunny":3bc73]You say USA is a threat without really thinking about what they have done in the 20thC.

What would happen if the USA wasn't here for the following:

World War 1
World War 2
Korea
Gulf
Bosnia
Kosovo

The only countries that are capable of stopping aggression and actually have the balls to stick up for what is morally right are the Anglo Saxon speaking ones, USA,UK,Canada,Australia etc.

Do you think Egypt would have stopped Saddam Hussein taking over Kuwait?
Do you think Italy/France/Germany would have stopped the Kosovo crisis?

And you think the USA is a threat, roflmao.[/quote:3bc73]


world war II you came in at the end so you didnt really help us considering most of your worries were japan and how many of those did the states start

pest 03-05-2003 10:52 AM

US with Isolationist Foriegn policy:

# of world conflicts - 100's
# or world wars - 2


US with more assertive Foriegn policy:

# of world conflicts - 100's
# of world wars - 0



As far as I can tell, the US only has two rules:

1 - dont fuck with us or our allies
2 - dont fuck with our oil

How hard is that to understand? We have a big ass "beware of dog" sign in our yard. You fuck with the dog you get bit. Simple. The dog isnt the threat, he is a promise. The threat is the dumb ass that swats the dog on the tail.

BallisticWookie 03-05-2003 10:52 AM

[quote=SuperMan]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Fluffy_Bunny":5619d
You say USA is a threat without really thinking about what they have done in the 20thC.

What would happen if the USA wasn't here for the following:

World War 1
World War 2
Korea
Gulf
Bosnia
Kosovo

The only countries that are capable of stopping aggression and actually have the balls to stick up for what is morally right are the Anglo Saxon speaking ones, USA,UK,Canada,Australia etc.

Do you think Egypt would have stopped Saddam Hussein taking over Kuwait?
Do you think Italy/France/Germany would have stopped the Kosovo crisis?

And you think the USA is a threat, roflmao.


world war II you came in at the end so you didnt really help us considering most of your worries were japan and how many of those did the states start[/quote:5619d]

Fuck off you cocksmoking shitstain. Welcome to your ban.

Sergeant_Scrotum 03-05-2003 10:55 AM

you guys did help in WW1 & 2 because you knew that once germany finished off europe, they woulda come for you guys too. think the reason most people dont like the US cause it sticks its nost into things that are no concern of the states. the viatnam war, the one blackhawk down was set in (blonde moment & cant remember what its called) & many others like that.

03-05-2003 11:03 AM

[quote="Sargent_Scrotum":10d33]you guys did help in WW1 & 2 because you knew that once germany finished off europe, they woulda come for you guys too. think the reason most people dont like the US cause it sticks its nost into things that are no concern of the states. the viatnam war, the one blackhawk down was set in (blonde moment & cant remember what its called) & many others like that.[/quote:10d33]


couldnt say it better my self

BallisticWookie 03-05-2003 11:05 AM

[quote="Sargent_Scrotum":d4559]you guys did help in WW1 & 2 because you knew that once germany finished off europe, they woulda come for you guys too. think the reason most people dont like the US cause it sticks its nost into things that are no concern of the states. the viatnam war, the one blackhawk down was set in (blonde moment & cant remember what its called) & many others like that.[/quote:d4559]

The one blackhawk down was set in ?? You really seem to know what your talking about here. That tragedy was Somalia, and the UNs mission to Somalia included the US, Australia, Malayans, Pakistani's, Canadians and many more. The mission there was to stop genocide you ignorant fool. Pay attention to the story of the movie, or perhaps read the book. All of the nations involved in that had every right to be there. It was only when US troops started dieing that it became a big issue. Good was being done there, and Clinton and his Administration fucked it all up. They wanted results quicker than possible and made the military conduct missions without proper support. Get your facts straight.

Fact is, if the US didnt stick it's nose where it wasnt wanted then alot more shittier things would be occuring around the world. Get some fucking sense about ya.

Old Reliable 03-05-2003 11:48 AM

biggest threat to world peace = terrorists

Bazooka_Joe 03-05-2003 12:45 PM

N. Korea. They are the ones speaking out so often about nuclear threats, and bombings, etc.

If we ever talk about attacks or bombings, we try to at least do it in a sencible matter, where we aren't scaring the civilians. Although, Bush's statement to Iraq "If needed, we will nuke you" was over the line.

Hurricane11 03-05-2003 12:52 PM

why is ethiopia even in the poll?

Sergeant_Scrotum 03-05-2003 01:10 PM

I find north korea a way bigger threat to the world than iraq. i would feel better if the states were going after north korea & not iraq.

HaVoc 03-05-2003 02:18 PM

Ya your right, if their intentions were truly to disarm. But the fact of the matter is simple; unlike Iraq there is nothing to gain in North Korea...

ninty 03-05-2003 02:37 PM

I was actually suprised at the votes here.

I would definitley say the USA is NOT a greater threat to world peace than NK or Iraq. I really don't understand why anyone would say that. I take that as sort of an ignorant answer.

I didn't read all the posts because I didn't want to nor do I have the time, but in my opinion NK is the greatest followed by China and Iraq. WHich is the greater threat between Iraq and China I do not know.

[RA]ZdaN 03-05-2003 03:31 PM

The votes for the US is mostly by the canadian members i can see but not all of them the ones that did tho are fucking retards

Old Reliable 03-05-2003 03:34 PM

wookie= their mission was not to stop genocide but to make sure the food was allocated to the people and not the war clans

Vance 03-05-2003 04:09 PM

Reliable: That was the Marines job. After the Marines left Aidid started killing UN peacekeepers. The final straw was when a CDM killed 4 US soldiers. Soon after, Clinton orders Task Force Ranger to be deployed to Somalia in order to catch Aidid......

Old Reliable 03-05-2003 04:30 PM

yeah but there was no way they could stop the genocide with peaceful actions

Milla 03-05-2003 04:31 PM

Notice every vote the US got is from canada oOo: beautiful allies i must say. hake:

Milla 03-05-2003 04:37 PM

Plus someone said we were in 8 major wars since weve been around, well lets see about 75% of them we were forced, or dragged into, the revolutionary war, civil war (damn rednecks biggrin: ), War of 1812, World War 1 AND 2, Korea we kind of had to put down. And the gulf war which we had to stop saddam from taking over every middle eastern country. Now the vietnam war is the only war i dont honstly agree with., But however we DID NOT lose that war, our objectuve was to stop the north from invading the south, which we did.

geRV 03-05-2003 04:39 PM

[quote="Capt. John Miller":9636c]Plus someone said we were in 8 major wars since weve been around, well lets see about 75% of them we were forced, or dragged into, the revolutionary war, civil war (damn rednecks biggrin: ), War of 1812, World War 1 AND 2, Korea we kind of had to put down. And the gulf war which we had to stop saddam from taking over every middle eastern country. Now the vietnam war is the only war i dont honstly agree with., But however we DID NOT lose that war, our objectuve was to stop the north from invading the south, which we did.[/quote:9636c]

TURN ON AIM N0000B

Chronic Diarrhea 03-05-2003 05:47 PM

Also our goal in Vietnam was to stop Communism from spreading. Today you can count the commie countries on one hand, and most of them are in ruins.

Anyway my take on NK is the only reason they are coming out and spraying all this BS is because their country is in shackles. NK has the exact same weapons as they did five or six years ago, thanks to Clinton. NK is just trying to get something out of these threats to prevent their country from going overboard.

imported_Fluffy_Bunny 03-05-2003 06:08 PM

[img]our objectuve was to stop the north from invading the south, which we did.
[/img]


In 1975 NWA tanks were rolling into Saigon and US helicopters evacuating the US embassy, sounds like you lost it to me.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.