Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   World view of America. . . (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=21221)

pest 03-21-2003 08:01 AM

Yes we started late, but we stayed late too. We finished up in the pacific, with little or no european help. We kept W Berlin open with our airlifts. We pumped billions of dollars into war torn europe. The french provided teh victory wine. They were grateful and fully expressed it then. Its now almost 60 years later. We need to quit holding it over their heads, but this showing up late garbage is silly. The french are free to make what ever choices they want. Thats what it is about, freedom. But I am also free to think that they are putting their financial ambitions above the good of the rest of the world.

Vance 03-21-2003 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pest
Yes we started late, but we stayed late too. We finished up in the pacific, with little or no european help. We kept W Berlin open with our airlifts. We pumped billions of dollars into war torn europe. The french provided teh victory wine. They were grateful and fully expressed it then. Its now almost 60 years later. We need to quit holding it over their heads, but this showing up late garbage is silly. The french are free to make what ever choices they want. Thats what it is about, freedom. But I am also free to think that they are putting their financial ambitions above the good of the rest of the world.

Damn, you beat me to it pest. gg.

Ydiss 03-21-2003 08:08 AM

That's about as reasonable a statement of opinion that I've read on this thread, pest.

I can't fault it.

I'm not an advocate of saying "We did this for you, you owe us this" because you then go down the forever spiralling route leading to ripostes like "Yeh, but think back 100 years when we did this for you, if that didn't happen then...".

Oh what about when that ape-man decided that trees were no longer fun anymore, what if that hadn't have happened? Who bloody cares!

"What ifs" acheive nothing.

It's silly.

Again, a good post, pest.

A HUNGRY FATMAN 03-21-2003 08:14 AM

the french gov said they did not sell any technolgy to iraq now we all know that is bullshit but so what the US sold them antrax and other deadly nervgas's all cuntrys have sold military tchnolgy at some point but who cares france dosnt want war fine dont care they can say and do what they want you can call them pussy and gay and thats your opinon and i respect that. also when the US went to war in Eu they did it for england not france. feance was just a pluss

A HUNGRY FATMAN 03-21-2003 08:16 AM

i wish i could eddit my post for spelling

Jedi Marksman 03-21-2003 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oddball
Point is USA wouldn't exist without France.

World War I, World War II. Marshall Plan. Lafayette has been more than repaid! Understand? Good.

Jedi Marksman 03-21-2003 08:23 AM

[quote=Oddball]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vance1
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Cool Fool":30f55
France helped at Yorktown 1781
[img]http://members.aol.com/spursfan50/davidallen/gwco.gif[/img]

Yeah, about 20 minutes before the Revolution ENDED.

OK this has got to be the most supreme piece of crap ever to come out of someone's mouth. Americans claim they helped out Europe....but they showed up late.

Also the French soldiers were the only regualrs who could stand up to the Germans and British soldiers in the American Revolution. The Colonial Regualrs just didn't have the training or experience.

SO a certain country wouldn't friggin' exist without France so all you Americans pissed off at France can just STFU[/quote:30f55]


I have nothing against France, but I feel they think we owe them some sort of debt and we owe them nothing. Their opportunisitc, selfserving assistance in the Revolution nonwithstanding. You say the USA would not have existed without France, debatable. However, France would certainly not exist now if it had not been for the USA and it's Allies. Period!

Simo Häyhä 03-21-2003 08:44 AM

[quote="Jedi Marksman":b5f67]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oddball
Point is USA wouldn't exist without France.

World War I, World War II. Marshall Plan. Lafayette has been more than repaid! Understand? Good.[/quote:b5f67]
you forgot about vietnam also

Ydiss 03-21-2003 08:45 AM

I'm not being funny, and it's not my conversation, but what does 'nam got to do with the French? biggrin:

Ydiss 03-21-2003 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ydiss
I'm not being funny, and it's not my conversation, but what does 'nam got to do with the French? biggrin:

Edit: Er has not does

Simo Häyhä 03-21-2003 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ydiss
I'm not being funny, and it's not my conversation, but what does 'nam got to do with the French? biggrin:

vietnam was owned by the french(formally called french indochina) it would have been nice to see france support us in vietnam but they didnt

Ydiss 03-21-2003 08:51 AM

Gotcha, thanks. 'nam is slightly before my time so I won't go into it.

I'll take your word :)

pest 03-21-2003 08:52 AM

[quote="Simo Häyhä":4fe6a]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ydiss
I'm not being funny, and it's not my conversation, but what does 'nam got to do with the French? biggrin:

vietnam was owned by the french(formally called french indochina) it would have been nice to see france support us in vietnam but they didnt[/quote:4fe6a]

The french bailed out of indo china, we moved in "to stop communism". It was a very different world back then. Todays attitudes cannot be applied to yesterdays situations.

Vance 03-21-2003 08:53 AM

The French got their asses whooped in Nam. Watch We Were Soldiers for some info about it.

Jedi Marksman 03-21-2003 08:56 AM

[quote="Simo Häyhä":1e29e][quote="Jedi Marksman":1e29e]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oddball
Point is USA wouldn't exist without France.

World War I, World War II. Marshall Plan. Lafayette has been more than repaid! Understand? Good.[/quote:1e29e]
you forgot about vietnam also[/quote:1e29e]

(Snaps fingers)I certainly did. Thanks, Simo. biggrin:

Ydiss 03-21-2003 09:21 AM

I must say that by discounting the fact that the Americans owe the french for favours past (due to favours repaid) that the original statement "The French owe us for World War II" is an irrelavent one.

As I said, it's a silly argument.

You can go on for hours and hours arguing that the French owe this and the Americans owe this.

Bottom line is the French are perfectly within their rights to have their opinion of America since these new turn of events.

As do all the other countries that do not support the war or Bush's actions.

Just because a person helps a child defend himself from a bully it does not mean that child is then obligated to agree with and support that person if they then go and do something later on that they do not believe in.

That's a loose analogy but it is still true, depending on the situation and context of course. I'm sure said child would be sure to help the person who helped them if they were attacked at a later time, if they could, however.

9/11/01 America was attacked and the French supported you then (through charity funds at the very least). They aren't monsters. You didn't see the French veto the retaliatory strikes on Afghanistan, did you?

I'm sure that opinion of my country is lower now, as well, as we have stood by Bush's ideals all the way.

I don't mind that, I generally am happier having America as an ally than any other nation, but at the same time I understand why this alienation is taking place.

Jedi Marksman 03-21-2003 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ydiss
I must say that by discounting the fact that the Americans owe the french for favours past (due to favours repaid) that the original statement "The French owe us for World War II" is an irrelavent one.

As I said, it's a silly argument.

You can go on for hours and hours arguing that the French owe this and the Americans owe this.

Bottom line is the French are perfectly within their rights to have their opinion of America since these new turn of events.

As do all the other countries that do not support the war or Bush's actions.

Just because a person helps a child defend himself from a bully it does not mean that child is then obligated to agree with and support that person if they then go and do something later on that they do not believe in.

That's a loose analogy but it is still true, depending on the situation and context of course. I'm sure said child would be sure to help the person who helped them if they were attacked at a later time, if they could, however.

9/11/01 America was attacked and the French supported you then (through charity funds at the very least). They aren't monsters. You didn't see the French veto the retaliatory strikes on Afghanistan, did you?

I'm sure that opinion of my country is lower now, as well, as we have stood by Bush's ideals all the way.

I don't mind that, I generally am happier having America as an ally than any other nation, but at the same time I understand why this alienation is taking place.

I agree. The French are perfectly within their rights as a sovereign state and as indivuduals to have their opinions. I'm saying no debts are owed on either side.

Ydiss 03-21-2003 11:00 AM

This is really cool. All of the "fringe" (or unofficial) War in Iraq topics are drawing to peaceful and amiable closes.

I really need to double check this is actually aa.com...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.