all this word of "grunge" makes me want to kill myself. were gonna have kids with names like "50 cent" bragging about their hardcore grunge sigs. a sig is something that is suppose to be personal in my eyes, copying other peoples style.. well, nevermind anyone with half a brain can understand what im getting at.

btw zoner this is pretty odl but whatever



[img]http://www.dodstudios.net/uploads/uploads/jamesdeanattni.gif[/img]

koo'

yuo r teh trendsettah biggrin:

Why exactly was kyles picture edited out? It was seemingly ok for sclass to have a sig containing a kid pissing on a soldier for a sig pic. But when someone uses a picture of a baby in an artistic sense its edited?

Who edited it and why i don't see anything wrong with it.

[quote="aNti hEro":2f470]forgot to post picture

EDIT: Anti, don't post shit like that here or you'll join Strik0r very quickly, I'll see to that.[/quote:2f470]

gee i didnt know there was a borderline in art. its a fucking child, grow up. maybe if u would look past the fact that it is a naked baby (omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and see the meaning why i used it, u wouldnt be so harsh to punish something thats was purely innocent. id love to see u at an art show. OMG NAKED PEOPLE SOMEONE TAKE THIS DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! btw sclass is allowed to have a sig which has no meaning, other than to be crude of a kid pissing on a soldier with his penis showing. fucking sad

I edited it, and I would've edited Sclass's too if I could get rid of sigs.

It was offensive and inappropriate for this forum, Gerard. Plain as that. A naked baby with red spots what look like sores all along its side? C'mon, man, it doesn't take too much thinking to realize that it's a disturbing image.

No more disturbing than the pics joe posted a while back of a dead guy, or even the pics i posted a while back of the columbine killers with their heads blown off. That pic was very very tame in terms of a graphic nature compared to what i just mentioned, I dont agree with it being edited out at all.

the whole point of the picture; to be disturbing and shocking. whatever im not gonna argue.

Did I ever say that those images were ok?? No I didn't. In fact, I didn't see them since they were mercifully removed before I did. If I had seen them, you can be damned sure I would've lobbied for their removal.

I'm just trying to keep a tame section of the forum. That's all. I'm all for artistic integrity...man, fill your fucking boots with it. However, there are things that just should not be shown on this forum. I think that baby image falls into that category. And the other people who posted in that thread apparently thought so too (aside from you and anti).

I'm sure the intention of the image, as anti noted, was to shock and disturb. Fine. Post it elsewhere; not on a gaming web forum where there could be youngish people. Call me a prude or a nazi, I don't fucking care. I'm doing my job as I see fit.

agreed

there isnt much stuff there though