oh... ok... I was confused... I thought humans had free-will, and that love went beyond religion, oh well...

if you feel that way thats fine, it is your right to have your own beliefs. We are talking about a vote in Michigan that is being labeled as the "gay marrige" proposal when it is far from that. It will limit far more than gay marrage it will limit civil unions which opens a whole can of worms. This would also ammend our Constitution, not a new law, the Constitution. I dont want two generations from now saying "why is sex in the Constition?" it is currently against the law in Michigan for same sex marrage so why do we need this? Its because of all the BS that is put in the fine print. They (the politions) label it as a gay marrage bill so it will pass but if you read the whole thing it is much more than that.


what ever you do get off your lazy ass and go vote

Dont worry sweety, one day the world will accept our decision and allow us to marry like we planned.

And yes, ive voted already. Filled out my absentee ballot for Kerry. And who gives a shit if gay people marry? If its not harming me then let them do what they want. I dont see how it would effect our society in the least. Equal rights for all! Legalize Drugs too!

ive known gay people and think they suk.

i agree that marriage shouldnt be fucked with ...

I think marriage should be extended to a man and any being from the same Kingdom.

[quote="Judas"]ive known gay people and think they suk.
quote]




oOo:

gay marriage oOo: I could careless about two men getting married but why there is so much protest is b/c alot of em want to get married through christian beliefs and ceremonies which do not support gay marriage so hmm, first thing that would really need to change is the church's standings on gay marriage

No i'm not, i'm Canadian. However if I were american, I would vote. I have voted in every single election, referrendum or anything else I could since I turned 18. I've voted in one federal election, one municipal, a by-election, and will be voting in the upcoming provincial election on Nov 22.

I see something interesting here. Perhaps they wouldn't have the kerfluffle they had in flordia if they kept the ballots simple. Just have the federal election thing on the ballot and thats it.

Thats how it was for Canada's federal election. Very simple. Very easy. Took me 10 seconds. Maybe it's a non issue, but can't they do those proposals and things in another forum held at another time? I know its convenient to do them at the same time, but perhaps in a election this close, you want to make things as simple as possible.

Put an X beside the Candidate you want for president:
John Kerry


George Bush


Ralph Nader


It really seems that simple to me.

Tell the people of florida that biggrin:

50% of marriages fail, so whats the big deal if gays get married. there probably the only people that can make a marriage work.

But dude....they're gay! EL HOMOS!

yes, el homos es suk

Suck me?

Fuente de información para adolescentes y para profesionales de la salud interesados en el tema


lol -49

SPANISH OVERLOADP9YPRWI BNM/~z|}~

puta

I think there's a fault in the -karma central tabulator.

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":6dd31]yes I will
Bush

NO on 1

NO on 2

come on Nyck read the fine print vote no on those proposals. 1 would give too much power to the Indian casinos and 2 would limit much more than gay marrage, it is already illegal for gays to marry. Sex should NOT be in Michigans constitution[/quote:6dd31]

1 dont tell me what to vote for your voting for bush thats fine im voting for what I feel about

2.. I dont care about casinos to begin with...who gives a shit ...guess what we raped and pillage the indians for this land...maybe they should be able to control some casinos.....I dont want to see slot machines in race tracks and every bar across the state....and I feel its very fair that THE COMMUNITY vote whether or not they want gambling in their town....not some dick heads who look out for only themselves.

3. I read proposal 2 as the way I read it and I am voting yes. Marriage in my eyes is man and woman and I feel it should state it just like that to leave NO doubt in anyones mind WHAT a marriage is. I know a few homosexuals..one of them is the lead of my department at work and I get along with him great. It still not going to sway my vote.

The proposal would:

* Amend the state constitution to provide that "the union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose."

what more fine print is there....there is always speculation on what it will do but the way I read it it says that man and woman in marriage is the only thing that will be recognized as that....It also stops activist judges from voting that the gay marriage ban is unconstitional

/end

Speak for youself, the first generation of my family moved to the US in 1904 happy:

Yea and we fought the civil war in the 1860's oOo:

the United states was created in 1776.........we fucked the native americans right in the ass and said thanks dont let the door hit ya on the way out

I know. loney:

Ok, to answer the original topic, yes, i'm going to exercise my Constitutional Right and vote.

As for a comment on Bukdez statement, i give a fuck. Gay marriages were not meant to be. If they allow it, they'll have to re-vamp all the State constitutions regarding marriage. Also pension plans, retirement plans, medical coverage, life insurance policies, child custody...blah, blah will all have to be re-written and thats a waste of time and money.
If they want to bang themselves in the ass or lick themselves silly, thats their business. What they don't need is the State to recognize the union. It's a slap in the face to probably all religions.
Remember, it was "Adam and Eve"....not "Adam and Steve".

i already voted about a month ago

Cobb president
yes on 1 - didnt read fine print would have voted no now
no on 2 - fucking authoritarian amendment

anyother thing i voted for women and non-conservatives and 3rd parties if possible

You act like that's a bad thing.

Actually it was Adam and Lillith first.

Sadistic bitch. rock:

[quote="Old Reliable":77235]i already voted about a month ago

Cobb president
yes on 1 - didnt read fine print would have voted no now
no on 2 - fucking authoritarian amendment

anyother thing i voted for women and non-conservatives and 3rd parties if possible[/quote:77235]

Your such a rebel rock: oOo:

Nyck, first off calm down. What I said was in no an attack on you. Did you know many companies provide health insurance for people living in civil unions, most of which are male/female? Who is going to pick up the insurance for these people? We have enough people without health insurance as is. I dont like it when laws are made over laws that already exsist. It is a waste of time and money. Vote as you see fit, it is your right but this ammendment is not worded properly.