![]() |
Shit man CoD2 looks awesome, that vid gerv showed me was amazing.
|
Quote:
|
A D-Day landing...haven't seen that before.
|
[quote="dr nein":2f736]A D-Day landing...haven't seen that before.[/quote:2f736]
Who gives a shit? CoD2 does it better than anybody else by far to date. |
So did MOHAA. Why the fuck doesn't anyone make a Pacific game aside from the questionable PA? Is it getting to the point that anything requiring new research instead of new graphics is considered too much?
|
[quote="dr nein":cd619]So did MOHAA. Why the fuck doesn't anyone make a Pacific game aside from the questionable PA? Is it getting to the point that anything requiring new research instead of new graphics is considered too much?[/quote:cd619]
I agree, a better Pacific Theater game would be cool. And look at the diffrence between the 2 CoD's, i thought CoD's graphics were awesome when they came out...fucking technology is silly. |
ok so can we start with other ww2 theaters, why can noone make a game with the battle between the dutch forces against chinese forces in indonesia ???... anyway i like cod2, its very good looking and what i heard about gameplay elements its going to rule....
out |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Kids (13-16 YO) watch SPR and BoB. They see Pvt Jackson and Sgt Guarnere and want to be just like them. They see this commercial about a PC fighting the Germans so they beg mommy to go buy it for them. Same with Enemy at the Gates. It's all about the money. SPR - Omaha Beach - MOHAA/COD2 BoB - D-Day Paratroopers - MOHSH/COD BoB - Ardennes Forest - MOHSH/COD EATG - Crossing the river, Red Square, sniping Germans - COD |
stfu angel:
|
Seriously who the fuck wants to play a pacific theatre game? There are too many problems associated with making one the main one being the terrain never changes, its fucking jungle jungle jungle. PArt of being entertained by a game is not repeating the same boring ass landscape map after map, europe has destroyed cities etc, pacific has one thing, jungle. oOo:
Pacific assault had an amazing pearl harbor sequence i donlt think anyone would dispute that, it just got really monotonous as all fuck when each level looks pretty much the same as the last with the odd river or small village tossed in every so often..hell even the villages started looking the same after a while. Pacific assault probably had 2 interesting levels, the tarawa atoll attack at the end of the game, and the pearl harbor sequence, inbetween all that was jungle jungle jungle jungle, jungle with added mist to make it look like a swamp and some very very sad attempt at putting controllable vehicles into the game with that aeroplane level. We had the gimpy ai as well who did nothing but banzai charge and could actually spawn in front of the player. Then we had the bouncy flubber grenades that seemed to have all the properties of a piece of rubber Id probably much rather play an enhanced version of allied assault with better ai, better graphics and less scripting than have the living shit bored out of me by another pacific theatre game. Maybe its because im from europe but when i think ww2 i think nazi germany, not a pack of wannabe japs with all their uber shitty weaponry. Hell even ea realised the pacific theatre was useless and thats saying something, rising sun was meant to have a sequel with you playing the guy from rising suns brother and that never happened after rising sun turned out to be one of the biggest pieces of shit ive ever had the misfortune of playing. Only reason they still brought out pa was it was almost done. I remember writing up a big long ass rant on pa but losing it, judas might still have it though. Thats why im glad to see call of duty 2, it has a beach landing but point du hoc has never been done before in any game, it would be different if it was yet another omaha but its not. COD has surpassed MOH in every area besides graphics, but thats soon to be remedied in cod2. I just wonder how the morons at ea feel after firing the guys that made mohaa who then proceeded to hand ea their asses with call of duty. |
MOHAA was the only good MOH game I've ever played (with the exception of the original and Underground, but that really doesn't count). Even Spearhead was worthless aside from a few fun moments in the Ardennes. I never played Rising Sun, because the graphics were worse than MOH and Underground for PS1, and in general it just looked like a horrible game. PA has some nice features about it, but the one thing that it probably fails in is it tried to be like CoD, where I think the old MOHAA style of gameplay fits that particular franchise.
CoD was a very cool game the first time around. Nobody had done a war game where there were so many other soldiers running alongside you. The SP was fun, but I could never get into MP. It just seemed to me that it sucked that you could run around the map in what seemingly felt like you were on a crack-cocaine withdrawal, desperate to find your fix. Whoring the map with the PPSH and getting 85 kills per round is really not my idea of fun. I'm old school, I still like the weapons in MOHAA, I like how it flows. Sure, the MP in that game seems disgustingly boring compared to cutting-edge games now, but I've yet to se a MP that felt as natural as MOHAA. |
I dont get why dod:s is taking so long to be released...
I mean their paid people to do this shit and their`s modders who release just as good as mods in half the time |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't look directly at the sun! stupid: |
[quote="Mr.Buttocks":c6feb]
Quote:
Don't look directly at the sun! stupid:[/quote:c6feb] oOo: Talking about people who might use it to their advantage so you have to fire in that direction and get glared nub. plzdie: |
[quote=geRV]
Quote:
Talking about people who might use it to their advantage so you have to fire in that direction and get glared nub. plzdie:[/quote:a0028] Wear shades. spank: |
[quote="Mr.Buttocks":806ae][quote=geRV]
Quote:
Talking about people who might use it to their advantage so you have to fire in that direction and get glared nub. plzdie:[/quote:806ae] Wear shades. spank:[/quote:806ae] FUCKIN DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!! wallbash: |
Quote:
[img]http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/5543/shadessized8kd.jpg[/img] |
rofllll
cool: |
it is bullshit that it isn't free.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
[quote=Pyro]
Quote:
|
OMFG SUN H4X!!!1
|
Quote:
|
[quote=Pyro]
Quote:
Shawn if you havn't played through or even tried hl2 single player theres something very wrong, the game cost around $40 million to make, believe me its worth playing the single player just to experience it, if you havn;t then thats just a waste of money you got sitting there of probably the most hyped game of the last 5 years. |
I'm going to agree with pyro. Even though they did more than convert it; the public deserves it for free with all the crap we have put up with from Valve.
|
[quote="Chronic Diarrhea":14cfa]
Quote:
|
Quote:
hl 1>hl 2 |
hl1 isnt even close to being better than hl2, wtf drugs are you on.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
go back to saving your soft drink el tardo
|
oOo:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.