ROFL GTFO. Holding out your arms with 40 lb buckets of water, maybe. Holding out your arms with a 5 ounce controller, no.

[quote="Chronic Diarrhea":0aeba]ROFL GTFO. Holding out your arms with 40 lb buckets of water, maybe. Holding out your arms with a 5 ounce controller, no.[/quote:0aeba]
...

your a dumbass. Do you need more STD incrusted penii to silence you?

[quote=CoMaToSe]...

your a dumbass. Do you need more STD incrusted penii to silence you?[/quote:aa9c7]dont forget he's fat guys. Just holding his head up is damn near a total body workout ffs..

[quote=gtboys34]dont forget he's fat guys. Just holding his head up is damn near a total body workout ffs..[/quote:4e7fd]That's Really Funny! ed:

[quote=gtboys34]dont forget he's fat guys. Just holding his head up is damn near a total body workout ffs..[/quote:92eab]
I could say something, but I wouldnt want you to "lose it and do something bad", whatever that meant the_finger:

You could say fucking anything and everyone within 50 feet would try to slit your fucking throat homeboy

[quote=CoMaToSe]I could say something, but I wouldnt want you to "lose it and do something bad", whatever that meant the_finger:[/quote:9880e]was i lying? i know for sure that your third chins weighs more than my balls

[quote=gtboys34][quote=CoMaToSe]I could say something, but I wouldnt want you to "lose it and do something bad", whatever that meant the_finger:[/quote:74299]was i lying? i know for sure that your third chins weighs more than my balls[/quote:74299]
I could easily turn that into a sophmorish diss on you, but Id rather make chicken and malt liquor comments.

i bet the back of your neck looks like a pack of sausage

why would it....

eek:

Dude, that diss makes no sense.

Hint: You are fat.

eek:

When you buy a 360 you get a month trial of live gold, thats for playing online etc, after that month you;re on silver which means you cna dload demos movies updates but not play online. Gold for a year is $50 i think, saying that though you can get it on ebay for cheaper, its £50 in the uk and i got mine for half that on ebay.

[quote="Doctor Duffy":d2db5]Hint: You are fat.[/quote:d2db5]
so the back of my neck would look like a pack of sausages....

Nope, still doesnt make sense

ya I was talking to gtboys on msn about it

seems like ebay would be a better place to buy that.

I think I'll still hold off to buy one. seems too expensive right now, for me anyway.

fuck having a car and making its payments, I want a 360 instead loney:


Chicks dig guys with game consoles, right?

If they dont the 360's heavy enough to crack them over the head with, thus rendering them unconcious so you can sniff their panties. dance:

btw

http://movies.teamxbox.com/xbox360/gear ... 5_720p.wmv

watch that and tell me you dont want it happy:

Of course. A chick would much rather spend a nice warm cozy night sitting back watching her man scream obscenities at 12 year old kids through their headset in some online video game. happy:

a common mistake among idiots is linking biggest selling consoles to being the best. ps2 is good for the odd game, but the fact that even the dreamcast had games that seemed to be graphically more advanced even though the hardware was poorer than the ps2 is saying something. Medocre-ness, sony are very good at it.


At least with microsoft you know they have the sense to never release any hardware they make in pink.

The DC went down like a bag of bricks. Some games on the DC having better graphics than the PS2 couldn't even save it.

9/9/99

DC had some good games. Pod Racer. Sonic Adventure. CRAZY TAXI....







ecco the dolphin....

don't forget Seaman
[img]http://gamecenter.taiwan.cnet.com/features/e32k/Dreamcast/Seaman/Images/3.jpg[/img]

Virtual tennis was the sickest game on that thing

Dreamcast went down for a few specific reasons:

1. Sega were retarded and released addons for the genesis, mega cd and 32x and then dropped support for them not long after.

2. Saturn bombed pretty fast, again sega pretty much dropped support for it a couple of years into its life. Ea also dropped all support for the dreamcast because of sega pissing around.

After the above people pretty much got fed up of buying consoles and sega fucking them over. The ad campagin for dreamcast was weird as well, showed nothing of games just some big swirly logo. Add to that sonys utter bullshit about the capabilities of the ps2, that it was capable of rendering 300 million polygons per second, that jurassic park realism of graphics would be in their games etc. People just sucked all that bullshit in and took it as fact, graphically the ps2 was pretty piss poor, the dreamcast did have an advantage in graphics, but devs went to sony beucase of the previos sega antics of console support.

ps2 delivered on games but pretty much everything sony said about graphics was utter bullshit.

ahh, yes, the Sega Saturn.

[img]http://data1.blog.de/blog/f/fz1-3do/img/Image5.jpg[/img]

not bad

The first one was awesome. The second one felt a little different, but was still fun. I think the best games on the DC were Marvel vs Capcom 2 and Resident Evil: Code Veronica. But I just say that because I'm a fanboy of the RE series, and any of Capcom's versus games. biggrin:

The problem with Nintendo is that as good as there games/systems are, they have the most horrific game-delays for all their best games. Eventually, it comes down to the point where every good game gets delayed at least a couple months or more, and by then people get really pissed at Nintendo, and start buying other systems. Unless Nintendo learns to stop this, then people might start considering them a contender. But because it won't, PS3>360>Wii.

I suppose. Some games had great graphics, like God of War and Shadow of the Colossus. But when games were multi-platform releases, the game with the better graphics usually ended up being on the X-Box. Also, I highly doubt that the DC could have shown the kind of graphics found on certain PS2 games. Can you really imagine the two games I mentioned looking better on the DC? The PS2 even took some DC games and released them with better graphics. Just look at Resident Evil Code Veronica, for example.

A very involving thread..

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":96a89]The problem with Nintendo is that as good as there games/systems are, they have the most horrific game-delays for all their best games. Eventually, it comes down to the point where every good game gets delayed at least a couple months or more, and by then people get really pissed at Nintendo, and start buying other systems. Unless Nintendo learns to stop this, then people might start considering them a contender. But because it won't, PS3>360>Wii.[/quote:96a89]I don't know. Maybe Nintendo would prefer to make a delay in a games release over releasing one of their potentially best selling games early, and having the game look and feel like shit.

i could understand a one month delay or so, but in some cases, they would have the Zelda games delayed month after month till the point where almost a year had passed. I never cared for Zelda, but if that happened to a game I was really looking forward too, I would just stop caring. Honestly, look how many people still actually care about Duke Nukem Forever (aside from those who just want to play it due to it's ridiculous delay)?

People still care about Duke Nukem Forever? eek: I see what you mean.

ya no joke. my bro used to beat the hell out of me in that game. When he scored on me it felt like i was being scored on in real life. I hated that shit but it was fun at the same time..

ROFL
[url:76d75]http://pc.ign.com/articles/123/123880p1.html[/url:76d75]

http://duke.a-13.net/

That's just sad. Five years later and people still have faith that the game will be released?

Shadow of the Colossus' graphics aren't really that nice IMO. Plus the frame rate slows down a pretty good bit throughout the game. I'll agree with you on GoW though. Don't forget Metal Gear Solid 3.

[img]http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/023/928437_20060124_screen003.jpg[/img]

I have a hard time believing that the Dreamcast could have produced the same quality. The Dreamcast was about making fun games, like Power Stone and the NFL 2K series.

I've never been a graphics whore though, and I think the X360 and PS3 level graphics are more than enough to do the job. You'll find no complaints from me about this level of graphic capability:

[img]http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/263/932242_20060921_screen002.jpg[/img]

I played a demo of RSV a few weeks ago and the graphics do look that good.

[quote="Chronic Diarrhea":50fdb]Shadow of the Colossus' graphics aren't really that nice IMO. Plus the frame rate slows down a pretty good bit throughout the game. I'll agree with you on GoW though. Don't forget Metal Gear Solid 3.

[img]http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/023/928437_20060124_screen003.jpg[/img]

I have a hard time believing that the Dreamcast could have produced the same quality. The Dreamcast was about making fun games, like Power Stone and the NFL 2K series.

I've never been a graphics whore though, and I think the X360 and PS3 level graphics are more than enough to do the job. You'll find no complaints from me about this level of graphic capability:

[img]http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/263/932242_20060921_screen002.jpg[/img]

I played a demo of RSV a few weeks ago and the graphics do look that good.[/quote:50fdb]Well yeah, graphically MGS 3 was pretty good. I just didn't mention it because I only played it once, didn't like it very much. I liked MGS 2 way more. Except for the ending.

1997 - 2006 = 9 years. Fail.

The article you linked me to had a date of 2001, so I went with that date.