"isnt saddamn letting the weapons inspecter check his weapons now? "

No the asshole conartist wont and problably will never let them in, and if he did they would only be able to look at what he wants them to.

damn how come i always miss the good stuff!!!! cry:

I say forget the war (it's only a play where the rest of the world watches and critiques)
The answer is to send in a team of assassins to snuff the fucker out quietly
and cover it up! Now, the bastard is gone and the world really doesn't know who did
it so they can't jump on the US bashing train. Then we have time to consider the rest of our options
in the middle east. The time is now to strike, but to do it quietly.
Oh, just one thing about the French as allies....they're weak!!

yeah and you would know. hake:

You're absolutely right i would know! The French do nothing but
cry!! They're scared of everything!!

I very much doubt that the french are scared of everything and the sooner some of you americans get off this fucking "we are l33t" mentality the better, overconfidence can and WILL be your downfall.

Gerald....i'll let you get the last word !!

My names not gerald god dammit. cry:

French are not weak they and britan are actually what is doing most of the "dirty work" in the magical land that we know as the middle east. VIVE LA FRANCE! zooka: fire2:

His track record is enough for me to warrant a war. Just letting him sit there growing old while he gets stronger isnt a solution. His dictatorship must be ended. Will his loss in a war effect me at all ?? No. If I go to fight there, I would say so. Family members are currently on active service in the region. Am I scared for their safety ?? Yes. But that is what every service man and woman signs up for...the possibility of being called upon to defeat evil, and that son of a bitch (no matter what you say and tell me any different) is fucking evil. Do I like Arabs ?? No. I dont. But I hate Saddam for one reason and one reason only, he is a flatout prick, and his life needs to be ended and democratic rule put in place of his regime.

His "great and powerful army" crumbled under the Coalition forces in the Gulf War. Even the United States alone could defeat Iraq in a full scale conflict, infact, the job would be pretty piss easy for them. If the fighting is to take place in an MOUT environment, the United States would once again prevail. He may have numbers, but they certainly lack any form of discipline and most certainly lack the intense training that the Western Army's undergo. After all that is said and done, his military shouldnt be under-estimated, and the Pentagon should be looking at this situation with the utmost care and attention. It wont be easy, there will be deaths, but you cant just let him continue his rule in that area, it's not feasible.

Can you honeslty tell yourselves that Saddam DOESNT have Chemical or Biological weapons ?? To think that would be plain fucking ridiculous. It's obvious the reason he wont allow Weapons Inspectors back in, because the place is fucking full of those weapons. Do you think he stopped developing them at anytime in the past ?? Ofcourse he didnt, he has stockpiles that werent even discovered by the UN back in the 90's. Too put it bluntly the guy is a lying sack of shit, and to take his word over the Former Chief UN Weapons Inspector and defectors from Iraq is pretty stupid. They have said countless time Iraq has and still is developing them and studying them. To ignore expert and first hand knowledge like that from the people who have been to Iraq and from those thatdeveloped them or worked on those programs in Iraq is once again, stupid.

Thats my view of the situation. Take it as you will. But I strongly believe taking Saddam out is a first in a long line of things that need to be accomplished in the Middle East.....the other, wiping out all Islamic extremists.

Im off for the weekend. Be good.

you can't accually kill him because that is a UN rule

Do you honestly think for a second the United States of America are in this
for freedom or protection of <insert anything you please here>!? Boy you
MUST be kidding. They're protecting oil interests... and need to get rid of
Saddam to replace him with a puppet government. Simple fukn' shit.

For the people... HAH! Best one I've heard in a while.

[quote="[]PanZeR":2de19]you can't accually kill him because that is a UN rule[/quote:2de19]

Since when ?? Bringing him to trial will only delay the inevitable....his death. Or what is the other solution, put him in a retirement home in Florida surrounded by armed guards ??

A full scale war would not be good, im sure that Iraq has people who hate saddam and want him out, why don't we get a small number of special forces people in there and train an iraqi opposition force and attempt a military coup?

i dont think this war will be as easy as desert storm, all the arab nations have agreed to stick together if attacked. This war is gonna be a bit bigger and a bit longer.

[quote:80d48]This war is gonna be a bit bigger and a bit longer.[/quote:80d48]

Ya man ! Show 'em who's got the phattest sack ! We'll show them how much
bigger and longer our dicks are... while fucking them all the way :D

[BallisticWookie] Right on brother....you're my new hero!!

[Gerald]...i think i'll call you Gerald!!

[Innoxx] The Brits kick ass but the French still suck!!

Ya man ! Show 'em who's got the phattest sack ! We'll show them how much
bigger and longer our dicks are... while fucking them all the way :D[/quote:1fba5]


wow i didnt even see it cuming ed: evil:

*cough bay of pigs invasion cough*

If we want something done right we need to do it ourselves.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I basically agree with the "Colin Powell" viewpoint.

Well, it's worth a try.

Sodamn is a scourge

Saddam is not a scourge, hollywood releasing second rate movies is a scourge, saddam is a japanese schoolgirl compared to hollywood, if i were you id buy an assault rifle and prepare to defend your backyard from Jason Biggs and Freddie prinze jr.

Nice reasoning Wookie, you guys sound brainwashed. I still havn't heard a legit reason for war with Iraq. If Bush can't even come up with one, I highly doubt you guys will be able to.

[quote="ColinXP [3rdArmy]":aeb2b]Nice reasoning Wookie, you guys sound brainwashed. I still havn't heard a legit reason for war with Iraq. If Bush can't even come up with one, I highly doubt you guys will be able to.[/quote:aeb2b]

I would'nt call wook brainwashed, his country last I checked is against a war in Iraq, therefor he is against the norm. And I am not brainwashed either, I for many years was a democrat(sadly) until I realized they were weaking our military, and our borders, letting terrorists go(osama anyone) and whinig, pissing and moaning about everything. Have you heard what clinton had the audactiy to say? " We should not be going after saddam, we should be going after osama" hake: Clinton was handed the chance to get Osama by Sudan and he turned it down. I am now a staunch Conservitive Republican and damn proud of it. But I dont always follow the party line, the norm for conservitives is anti-abortion, I am pro-choice, Bush wanted to give many Illegals amnisty, I thought that idea was shit. So I form my own thoughts and follow them through I dont let other tell me what to believe.

Uh, ya! Whatever dude.

You really think you can stop terrorists from entering the US when you can't
even do shit about drugs ? Please. The only thing your new "security scam"
is doing is making it harder for normal people to get on the planes... and
maybe, just maybe the amateurs that want to hop on a plane with a knife
or something else with no intention of causing mayhem.

And forget about your precious "army": they're TOY SOLDIERS. There, I said
it. TOY SOLDIERS: they enroll in the army to go kick some ass oversea, get
trained day after day after day... but we won't use them because life is way
too precious. Yours is a scare-tactic army. Too bad most groups are catching
on...

Enough from me for now... time for my medication.

wow i didnt even see it cuming ed: evil:[/quote:cfc64]

Did you say cumming? Been watching a little too much porn?

SoLiDUS...if our army is "Toy Solidiers", what do you call yours??

oh, and another thing, they don't have a drug problem in Canada?

Yes, but Canada was not attacked by terrorists, and Canada is not about rid the world of terrorists on the scale the U.S. wants to. Getting rid of Iraq wont get rid of terrorism. Getting rid of Osama wont get rid of terrorists. Thnk about what would have happened if Hitler was killed by the Allies in 1941 or 1942?

Idiot.

What in the fuck makes the american army so god damn good in your opinion? They have nukes so what most of the countrys in the world have nukes. You have stealth bombers ? So what, fucking stealth bombers and the flying wing technology date back to ww2 when america ripped off the idea from the germans. Hell if it weren't for ww2 and the technology germany brought forth we might not be as advanced as we are today.

M-60? an mg-42 rip off, grease gun? mp-40 rip off. Fuck even the springfield-03 was basically a rip off of the mauser 98k and the spring field company after ww1 had to pay the mauser company royalties for the design. Jet technology was basically another german innovation.

Americas tanks after ww2 used designs HEAVILY inspired from the german tiger tanks. If it weren't for ww2 and germany america may just have become a recluse country again.

So you keep you little americas army rules tirade going, we all know most of the stuff is a rip off from other countrys developments. For you to say another countrys army sucks is just fucking plain ignorant. What happens if america send troops into an attack and they get their asses handed to them and the french kick some ass? Do the french still suck or i suppose you'll be pulling excuse after excuse out of your ass to cover for the 31337 army who just got a skull fucking they'll never forget.


fuck i hate these threads. M16:

I agree Gerard.

Amazing what a fit of rage can do. happy:

[quote="Recycled Spooge":3c562]Yes, but Canada was not attacked by terrorists, and Canada is not about rid the world of terrorists on the scale the U.S. wants to. Getting rid of Iraq wont get rid of terrorism. Getting rid of Osama wont get rid of terrorists. Thnk about what would have happened if Hitler was killed by the Allies in 1941 or 1942?[/quote:3c562]

Canada, or any other country for that matter can't wipe out terrorism on it's own, so i'll give you that. Getting rid of Saddam or Bin douchebag won't rid the world of terrorists, i'll give you that too.
Would you like us to just forget we were attacked and let the terrorists have their way? Are you for real or what? If you keep taking out the top leaders, eventually the empire will fall. Killing Saddam and Bin Douchebag is a good start if you ask me. You have any other alternatives you'd like to share with the rest of us? Heck, maybe i should just pack my bags and move to Canada. Shit, i forgot, i'll be amoungst those goddam French pussies....oh well, like Mick Jagger once said: "you can't always get what you want."

You're a retard. Go back and re-read my posts you moron. I never said a word about the French military.....all i said is the French SUCK. I didn't say "French military", i said the "French". The French always come up with excuses why we shouldn't do this or that. After the attacks, they were hesitant to say they were against terrorism and were afraid to join the fight in fear of their country being attacked. Besides, any American will tell you the French don't particularly care for us.....and for what i don't know or give a shit why...they still SUCK.
As for the American military, i didn't go around tooting our horns. As a matter of fact, i don't think i directly said anything about our armed forces. Who cares where the technology came from. It's there so we should use it. I guess the rest of the world should stop using electricity because Ben Franklin invented it? How stupid is that!! It's no wonder you hate these threads...you sound like an ass!!

...of course....one Canadian agreeing with another. Big suprise there!!

[quote=Arkan]Canada, or any other country for that matter can't wipe out terrorism on it's own, so i'll give you that. Getting rid of Saddam or Bin douchebag won't rid the world of terrorists, i'll give you that too.
Would you like us to just forget we were attacked and let the terrorists have their way? Are you for real or what? If you keep taking out the top leaders, eventually the empire will fall. Killing Saddam and Bin Douchebag is a good start if you ask me. You have any other alternatives you'd like to share with the rest of us? Heck, maybe i should just pack my bags and move to Canada. Shit, i forgot, i'll be amoungst those goddam French pussies....oh well, like Mick Jagger once said: "you can't always get what you want."

You're a retard. Go back and re-read my posts you moron. I never said a word about the French military.....all i said is the French SUCK. I didn't say "French military", i said the "French". The French always come up with excuses why we shouldn't do this or that. After the attacks, they were hesitant to say they were against terrorism and were afraid to join the fight in fear of their country being attacked. Besides, any American will tell you the French don't particularly care for us.....and for what i don't know or give a shit why...they still SUCK.
As for the American military, i didn't go around tooting our horns. As a matter of fact, i don't think i directly said anything about our armed forces. Who cares where the technology came from. It's there so we should use it. I guess the rest of the world should stop using electricity because Ben Franklin invented it? How stupid is that!! It's no wonder you hate these threads...you sound like an ass!![/quote:22eac]

You said the FRENCH WERE WEAK u fucking twat. Last i checked french people joined the french fucking army so you're saying the country AND their army is weak moron.

The french have a policy of not diving headfirst into everything where america has the policy of diving headfirst into everything knowing that it has its nuke arsenal and army as its backup. Sooner or later this little policy is gona backfire. Vietnam shoulda shut some people up and it did, another vietnam is what america doesn't need.

As for the technology theres a difference. Electricity was invented for world wide use its not exactly something that would have or could have for that matter remained in one countrys possession for any givewn length of time. As country progress they would have developed it over time. However america ripped off a lot of technologys over the years and basically claimed them as their own.

It has been said that germany during ww2 were technologically 5 years ahead of any other country in the world. Now if they hadn't ripped off this stuff from the germans during and at the conclusion of ww2 would america be the big superpower today? Probably not. At the end of ww1 america demilitarised and became a recluse country, the only reason they started developing weapons at the end of ww2 is because of korea and the "cold war" that followed.

[quote=Arkan]Canada, or any other country for that matter can't wipe out terrorism on it's own, so i'll give you that. Getting rid of Saddam or Bin douchebag won't rid the world of terrorists, i'll give you that too.
Would you like us to just forget we were attacked and let the terrorists have their way? Are you for real or what? If you keep taking out the top leaders, eventually the empire will fall. Killing Saddam and Bin Douchebag is a good start if you ask me. You have any other alternatives you'd like to share with the rest of us? Heck, maybe i should just pack my bags and move to Canada. Shit, i forgot, i'll be amoungst those goddam French pussies....oh well, like Mick Jagger once said: "you can't always get what you want."

You're a retard. Go back and re-read my posts you moron. I never said a word about the French military.....all i said is the French SUCK. I didn't say "French military", i said the "French". The French always come up with excuses why we shouldn't do this or that. After the attacks, they were hesitant to say they were against terrorism and were afraid to join the fight in fear of their country being attacked. Besides, any American will tell you the French don't particularly care for us.....and for what i don't know or give a shit why...they still SUCK.
As for the American military, i didn't go around tooting our horns. As a matter of fact, i don't think i directly said anything about our armed forces. Who cares where the technology came from. It's there so we should use it. I guess the rest of the world should stop using electricity because Ben Franklin invented it? How stupid is that!! It's no wonder you hate these threads...you sound like an ass!![/quote:b938f]

Ben Franklin didn't invent electricity. If I was in control of the U.S., I would certainly not attack Iraq because Iraq never attacked the U.S. It's a crazy idea, no? How about attacking Saudi Arabia; the homeland of the 9/11 terrorists? What a crazy idea! Try to use some logic. How about removing naval fleets and military bases off the Persian Gulf. The Arab states there are like under the iron curtain over there; either you submit to U.S. authority, or you get your shit blown up. Saudi Arabia is just as "evil" as Iraq but since it submits and agrees with the U.S. it's an ally now; although it's press and media is largely anti-American and anti-semitic. Same thing with China by the way.

[quote:0ddce]Would you like us to just forget we were attacked and let the terrorists have their way? Are you for real or what?[/quote:0ddce]

You're like that pussy kid that got picked on in junior high, only to develop
an unhealthy obsession with his attackers. You can remember, but one of
these days, you will have to move on. I don't think I need to extrapolate on
this...

[quote:0ddce]If you keep taking out the top leaders, eventually the empire will fall. Killing Saddam and Bin Douchebag is a good start if you ask me.[/quote:0ddce]

That is a fallacy: there will always be someone to take the Kingpin's place.
History keeps repeating itself, yet people just don't get the lesson.

[quote:0ddce]You have any other alternatives you'd like to share with the rest of us?[/quote:0ddce]

Ya, I do have a suggestion: how about using those billions you waste on
your TOY ARMY to good use, ie. helping the poor in your own country and
extending outward from there ? I know of four or five possible retorts to
this, and none of them are any good... so save your breath.

[quote:0ddce]oh well, like Mick Jagger once said: "you can't always get what you want." [/quote:0ddce]

Perhaps you should heed his words yourself.

I wish someone would respond to every sentence I typed..that would be exciting

[quote="Recycled Spooge":07f12]Ben Franklin didn't invent electricity. If I was in control of the U.S., I would certainly not attack Iraq because Iraq never attacked the U.S. It's a crazy idea, no? How about attacking Saudi Arabia; the homeland of the 9/11 terrorists? What a crazy idea! Try to use some logic. How about removing naval fleets and military bases off the Persian Gulf. The Arab states there are like under the iron curtain over there; either you submit to U.S. authority, or you get your shit blown up. Saudi Arabia is just as "evil" as Iraq but since it submits and agrees with the U.S. it's an ally now; although it's press and media is largely anti-American and anti-semitic. Same thing with China by the way.[/quote:07f12]

The whole Arab region is anti-American, however, they still come to this country for education and medical reasons...go figure!! About the possible attack on Iraq, i said we should just send a team of assassins to take Saddam out. As for having our military there, we have to. Remember Kuwait? Do you think our presence there might have something to do with some sort of civil peace in the region? I think so. As far as Saudi Arabia, they're an Arab nation so alot of pressure is put on them from other Arab nations. Bin douchebag was banned from that country so at least they appear to try to debunk terrorism.
Now how did China get into this? They support terrorism? If they hate us that bad also, maybe they shouldn't export their goods into this country anymore. Everything here is "made in China". I guess they like making money off of us.

[Gerald]......i'm done talking to you because it's like pissing in the wind!!

[quote=Arkan]The whole Arab region is anti-American, however, they still come to this country for education and medical reasons...go figure!! About the possible attack on Iraq, i said we should just send a team of assassins to take Saddam out. As for having our military there, we have to. Remember Kuwait? Do you think our presence there might have something to do with some sort of civil peace in the region? I think so. As far as Saudi Arabia, they're an Arab nation so alot of pressure is put on them from other Arab nations. Bin douchebag was banned from that country so at least they appear to try to debunk terrorism.
Now how did China get into this? They support terrorism? If they hate us that bad also, maybe they shouldn't export their goods into this country anymore. Everything here is "made in China". I guess they like making money off of us.

[Gerald]......i'm done talking to you because it's like pissing in the wind!![/quote:c3419]
I believe China killed its citizens just like Iraq is "doing", and it's the "evil" communist nation, like North Korea which is in the "Axis of Evil". But once again, we have a double standard.

You're like that pussy kid that got picked on in junior high, only to develop
an unhealthy obsession with his attackers. You can remember, but one of
these days, you will have to move on. I don't think I need to extrapolate on
this...

[quote:f81ba]If you keep taking out the top leaders, eventually the empire will fall. Killing Saddam and Bin Douchebag is a good start if you ask me.[/quote:f81ba]

That is a fallacy: there will always be someone to take the Kingpin's place.
History keeps repeating itself, yet people just don't get the lesson.

[quote:f81ba]You have any other alternatives you'd like to share with the rest of us?[/quote:f81ba]

Ya, I do have a suggestion: how about using those billions you waste on
your TOY ARMY to good use, ie. helping the poor in your own country and
extending outward from there ? I know of four or five possible retorts to
this, and none of them are any good... so save your breath.

[quote:f81ba]oh well, like Mick Jagger once said: "you can't always get what you want." [/quote:f81ba]

Perhaps you should heed his words yourself.[/quote:f81ba]

Yeah, i got my ass handed to me everyday at school. Brilliant.

Leave the kinpins in place? Perhaps they'll go away on their own??

Using the billions we waste on our TOY ARMY for good use like the poor? Like that is gonna help our battle against terrorism. Ahem, we have a system called "Welfare" to handle just that.

The Mick Jagger quote? Where does that fit in here?

Actually we had jets without german technology, Stop comparing to vietnam, That has nothing to do with anything! that time it was fucked up by politics and the people of the united states did not back it up.
We have a good army why cant u guys admit it? I dont see wth? we have a good army get over it! Why do people talk shit about us? If we want to invade iraQ then good 4 fucking us. U guys dont want to help oh fucking well. How does this affect other superpowers? it doesnt really.
We dont NEED help from other countrys. If we are gonna do this then its gonna get done.