I heard some news that COD is going to have a patch out soon, they will be adding more maps and some more .30 cal. MG's and some protable ones to the game also so more guns u can pick for german and other teams but thats what i heard.

^^ hope so

we have the fg42 and added a mg to the russians on our server..... you can download the mod on our temp site. http://www.mohct.com

server ip: 66.230.141.179:12203

Firing Squad =Fs= (server name)

If you dont have the mod you can still play, you just wont be able to select the new weapons.

What I havn't seen anyone talk about is ping, it dont matter a like it does in MOH. A 150 ping can compete with a 20 ping and I like to see someone run a MOH server with 60 peeps on it like you can in COD and still have it run nice and smooth.

i sure hope thats true cuz im getting CoD later today and im stuck on 56k for awhile annoy:

The ping still matters. If you are a third of a second (333 ping) behind everyone else, they still have the advatage. Its just not nearly as pronounced in cod. The net code is more efficient so your ping times are most likely better. Its doesnt seem to be as hardware intensive so servers run better, etc, etc.

But when my ping starts creeping over 100, I can tell, hit the tab key and sure enough, my ping is up high. With COD I just get much better pings to everywhere.

So true. I'm in Michigan. I played on a server located in Portugal and had a ping of 38. Awesome... couldn't understand a damn thing anyone was typing into the chat... but awesome nonetheless.

adding the fg-42 for the germans is great, but giving the russians the stg is wrong, the russian weapon selection is accurate....another version of your mod should be released that just adds the fg42 to axis weapon selection.

The russians are the only team without a mg.. since they already have a luger whats wrong with giving them the mp44? would you rather a BAR or possibly a sling shot? biggrin:

shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.

[quote="Sgt Stryker":f1a47]shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.[/quote:f1a47]

exactly, most russian soldiers were lucky to even have a gun and if they did the overwhelming majority carried mosin-nagants because there was alot of them and were easy to make, and the ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to make and mass produce.

[quote="Cpl. Eames":05f8f][quote="Sgt Stryker":05f8f]shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.[/quote:05f8f]

exactly, most russian soldiers were lucky to even have a gun and if they did the overwhelming majority carried mosin-nagants because there was alot of them and were easy to make, and the ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to make and mass produce.[/quote:05f8f]

you ned to stop watching Enemy at the Gates and read the book. It was the RETREATING troops who were forced to make a stand who did not have enough guns, why, because they lost them in the reatreat (not expecting to be forced to make a stand), the reinforcements were generally well armed, especially infantry attached to tank brigades.

no, the part you all are talking about on enemy at the gates...in real life would be russian prisoners sent to battle

[quote="Sgt Stryker":58559][quote="Cpl. Eames":58559][quote="Sgt Stryker":58559]shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.[/quote:58559]

exactly, most russian soldiers were lucky to even have a gun and if they did the overwhelming majority carried mosin-nagants because there was alot of them and were easy to make, and the ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to make and mass produce.[/quote:58559]

you ned to stop watching Enemy at the Gates and read the book. It was the RETREATING troops who were forced to make a stand who did not have enough guns, why, because they lost them in the reatreat (not expecting to be forced to make a stand), the reinforcements were generally well armed, especially infantry attached to tank brigades.[/quote:58559]

you misunderstood what i wrote, i said that most russian soldiers carried mosin nagants and ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to manufacture and thats why the russians werent given a mg in cod because its accurate.

[quote="Cpl. Eames":af8f2][quote="Sgt Stryker":af8f2][quote="Cpl. Eames":af8f2][quote="Sgt Stryker":af8f2]shoudln't be too hard to give the Soviets a DP-28, it performed similar to Bren, so just re-skin that and modify the number of rounds in magazine.[/quote:af8f2]

exactly, most russian soldiers were lucky to even have a gun and if they did the overwhelming majority carried mosin-nagants because there was alot of them and were easy to make, and the ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to make and mass produce.[/quote:af8f2]

you ned to stop watching Enemy at the Gates and read the book. It was the RETREATING troops who were forced to make a stand who did not have enough guns, why, because they lost them in the reatreat (not expecting to be forced to make a stand), the reinforcements were generally well armed, especially infantry attached to tank brigades.[/quote:af8f2]

you misunderstood what i wrote, i said that most russian soldiers carried mosin nagants and ppsh's because they were cheap and easy to manufacture and thats why the russians werent given a mg in cod because its accurate.[/quote:af8f2]

uh, no, the standard issue squad LMG was the DP-28, there weren't enough in early war, but the late-war unit where you storm Warsaw and Berlin would at least have one DP-28 per squad.
So you should at least see DP-28s in teh Warsaw and Berlin missions (with like 1 or 2 during the Stalingrad campaign)

BTW. the Germans didn't have STGs in Stalingrad, did they?