Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   MoH General Discussion (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   COMPLEX solutions to SIMPLE probelms (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=4854)

madrebel 02-14-2002 04:47 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BoBoZoBo:
Poor child<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
name the place man. my shotty vs your sniper rifle. lets see how good the sniper rifle is at close range

Low spark 02-14-2002 04:54 AM

Rebel is right about one thing making the gun a harder won't stop the sniping in masse.
I will still use it. I find using it now a challenge( can I hit the fool running across the street or can I get the idiot in the boat before he gets me). I like playing objective/strategy based games. And, I think that the sniper rifle in this game forces the opposition to use a little strategy. But 10 per team might be a little much. So somebody else give up their sniper rifle, because I won't.

madrebel 02-14-2002 04:57 AM

ahem

madrebel 02-14-2002 05:37 AM

bozo got mighty quiet.

BoBoZoBo 02-14-2002 06:02 AM

Escuse me for not replying promptly..there ARE other things to do in the day than argue with your slow ass. I figured I would give you some time to think. But now I am bored.

Saying that you would still use it is bullshit, because you dont know how it will be changed. Then there is the possibility that you do have skill, so for those with skill, it would not matter. But it would with those who dont, and that is the point. Get it out of the hand of those who cant hit shit for shit.

LowSparks remark about being able to hit anything is my whole point. Its TOO EASY. I'm sure, without a doubt, you would drop that weapon in a second if it was not that easy. So your point is mute. I agree that it adds strategy, I dont want to get rid of it either. But there would be even MORE strategy if it were harder to aim.

Rebel...please stop being stupid...I NEVER said that the sniper weapon would out perform the shotty at close range. I said (as I must continue to repeat shit for you) that the sniper weapon is just as effective at close range as it was at a distance. Me kicking you ass will not solve the fact that the sniper weapon is easy to use..so get over it.

Stop arguing unless you can get the points of argument clear. This is so very boring...

------------------
http://home.earthlink.net/~bobozobo/WW2.jpg

jujumantb 02-14-2002 06:20 AM

no no no... i think your definition of effective is off... i think u mean that it can kill someone at close range as well as at long range... well when u say "effective" u should take into account the fire rate, reload time, and the guy with an smg standing 10 feet in front of u... i dont mean to flame so pls politely correct me if u feel u auht to do so.

------------------
Next to God...
...A Grunts Best Friend
http://home.att.net/~steinert/_borders/medsym.gif

madrebel 02-14-2002 06:25 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BoBoZoBo:
Escuse me for not replying promptly..there ARE other things to do in the day than argue with your slow ass. I figured I would give you some time to think. But now I am bored.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>no you were trying to think up something
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
Saying that you would still use it is bullshit, because you dont know how it will be changed.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>saying he wouldnt is just as dumb then cause you dont know how it would be used <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Then there is the possibility that you do have skill, so for those with skill, it would not matter. But it would with those who dont, and that is the point.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>no it wouldnt. people use the weapon they want regardless <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> Get it out of the hand of those who cant hit shit for shit.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> why are you worried about people that cant hit anything with the sniper rifle? and how would making it a bit more difficult without limiting it help team play?
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
LowSparks remark about being able to hit anything is my whole point. Its TOO EASY. I'm sure, without a doubt, you would drop that weapon in a second if it was not that easy. So your point is mute.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

lowsparks said and i quote <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>I find using it now a challenge( can I hit the fool running across the street or can I get the idiot in the boat before he gets me). <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> i realize reading comprehension is new to you so take your time <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>I agree that it adds strategy, I dont want to get rid of it either. But there would be even MORE strategy if it were harder to aim.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> no there wouldnt be. the strategy would stay they same it would just have a higher degree of difficulty.

strat·e·gy Pronunciation Key (strt-j)
n. pl. strat·e·gies

The science and art of using all the forces of a nation to execute approved plans as effectively as possible during peace or war.
The science and art of military command as applied to the overall planning and conduct of large-scale combat operations.
A plan of action resulting from strategy or intended to accomplish a specific goal. See Synonyms at plan.
The art or skill of using stratagems in endeavors such as politics and business.

dif·fi·cult Pronunciation Key (df-klt, -klt)
adj.
Hard to do or accomplish; demanding considerable effort or skill; arduous: “To entertain is far more difficult than to enlighten” (Anthony Burgess). See Synonyms at hard.
Hard to endure; trying: fell upon difficult times.
Hard to comprehend or solve: a difficult puzzle.
Hard to please, satisfy, or manage: a difficult child.
Hard to persuade or convince; stubborn.

see the difference between the 2 now?
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
Rebel...please stop being stupid...I NEVER said that the sniper weapon would out perform the shotty at close range.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>you insinuated that when you attcked my ability to aim

in·sin·u·ate Pronunciation Key (n-sny-t)
v. in·sin·u·at·ed, in·sin·u·at·ing, in·sin·u·ates
v. tr.
To introduce or otherwise convey (a thought, for example) gradually and insidiously. See Synonyms at suggest.
To introduce or insert (oneself) by subtle and artful means.


<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> I said (as I must continue to repeat shit for you) that the sniper weapon is just as effective at close range as it was at a distance.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>its not. it has the same stopping power. but it is not suited for close range. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> Me kicking you ass will not solve the fact that the sniper weapon is easy to use..so get over it.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

any time any place. kick my ass with the sniper rifle. you CANT do it.



[This message has been edited by madrebel (edited February 14, 2002).]

jujumantb 02-14-2002 06:27 AM

how long did u take on that post rebel lol

------------------
Next to God...
...A Grunts Best Friend
http://home.att.net/~steinert/_borders/medsym.gif

madrebel 02-14-2002 06:27 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jujumantb:
no no no... i think your definition of effective is off... i think u mean that it can kill someone at close range as well as at long range... well when u say "effective" u should take into account the fire rate, reload time, and the guy with an smg standing 10 feet in front of u... i dont mean to flame so pls politely correct me if u feel u auht to do so.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
dont confuse him with deffinitions. he is far to intelligent for you.

madrebel 02-14-2002 06:28 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jujumantb:
how long did u take on that post rebel lol

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
not long at all.....*waiting for 8 hours to hit at work....waiting....waiting....DING*

jujumantb 02-14-2002 06:31 AM

hey rebel how do u quote someone? always wanted to know but never asked

------------------
Next to God...
...A Grunts Best Friend
http://home.att.net/~steinert/_borders/medsym.gif

BoBoZoBo 02-14-2002 06:53 AM

HAHA..what a fucking looser.

You just justified your own stupidity.
Thanks Rebel, I appreciate it...

By the way..you still don't maky any fucking sence.

------------------
http://home.earthlink.net/~bobozobo/WW2.jpg

[This message has been edited by BoBoZoBo (edited February 14, 2002).]

jujumantb 02-14-2002 06:55 AM

how bout me bozo...

------------------
Next to God...
...A Grunts Best Friend
http://home.att.net/~steinert/_borders/medsym.gif

BoBoZoBo 02-14-2002 07:00 AM

I have no problems with you Ju...
What do you want to start?

Rebel...keep up with the definitions. There are completely irrelevant to the post, but at least you are learning.

------------------
http://home.earthlink.net/~bobozobo/WW2.jpg

[This message has been edited by BoBoZoBo (edited February 14, 2002).]

madrebel 02-14-2002 07:19 AM

ok lets take a vote.

who is making more sense? me or bozo?

i say....sure change the way the rifle works make it harder im all for that. but it still wont change anything without hard number limits

bozo is saying just make the rifle harder to use and that will cure world peace.

im saying the rifle is horribly ineffective at close range

bozo is saying its just as effective at close range.

so please tell us both who is making sense and who isnt.

quote someone by typing in <quote>whatever they said</quote>(replace the <quote> with [quote])

or click the quote button above their post.


im home bozo....lets play im ready for you to school me.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.