Hey dudes all i wanted u guys to do was give some ideas about a 2nd medal of honar game not kill yourselves and question ur patriotism. lol oh well do what u guys want!

yeah, i spose some single player could be pretty cool, the more that i think of it the cooler a ww1 medal of honor game sounds

Yeah and in that WW1 game you play the role of the commander that gave Jimmy Patterson's briefing in the first MOH.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Kaiser:
shut ur fuckin mouth Blade, yes i DO know the winter killed germans, hitler never learned from Napoleans idiotic mistake.. But hell yah the russians did a lot more.. Read wut Partisan just said, and stop being sucha Patriotic american peice of shit<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Patriotic?

Sorry... but I was telling to truth..

If the US didnt enter the war Russia and Britian would be german provinces right now... and you need to learn your facts and get them straight boy... go read some more books or something... Thr Germans would of crushed and took over Moscow if it wasnt for the damn winter, so go shove your opinion up your ass and call it quits boy

------------------
http://3rdInfantry.homestead.com/fil.../Captblade.jpg

wut did i just say Blade?? YES the winter helped a lot, but as Partisan said 250 divisions of Germans were in Russia, and only 56 on western front.. Now.. If it would have been the other way around, im sure Americans probably would have retreated or have had HEAVY HEAVY losses.. And no im not a boy and yes i have all my facts straight.. Maybe u should read some books other then American and get ur sorry pathetic facts straight..

And Intrestviewer.. Sory but i cant stand morons that open their mouths without knowing wut the hell to say.

Ok the Russians might of killed more germans (oh boy, killing always wins the war). My point is that The Americans did more for the whole war. We fought Japan in the Pacific, Italy, and then went on to liberate the Mediteranean. As well as France. Russia had a major role, but I just strongly believe America did a bit more. So what if we didn't lose as many men as the Russians, but what war was ever won by losing more men? But you still gotta love the red army.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EaSyTrIcK50:
Ok the Russians might of killed more germans (oh boy, killing always wins the war). My point is that The Americans did more for the whole war. We fought Japan in the Pacific, Italy, and then went on to liberate the Mediteranean. As well as France. Russia had a major role, but I just strongly believe America did a bit more. So what if we didn't lose as many men as the Russians, but what war was ever won by losing more men? But you still gotta love the red army.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yet, again. I rest my case.

Thank You, Trick


------------------
http://3rdInfantry.homestead.com/fil.../Captblade.jpg

They contributed mostly because they were ass ounded at the begining of the war. America didn't have to get involved, but they did. Plus Americans didn't have much experience in war at the time. Just a bunch of kids with maybe a couple weeks of combat training. Germans and the axis had been training their men for 20 years. And America wasn't putting all their forces in one place like the Russians. Americans were everywhere. Don't even F*cking tell me the Russians did more in the war. If the Russians would have failed, then America and Britian and the rest of the allies would have mopped the floor with the Nazis in Russia.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Kaiser:
If you guys really think about it.. Russians killed more Germans then Americans did.. And my synopsis was the exact words of my Modern Wrld Hist teacher(not that it makes it right)
I mean if you ask many Historians the russians practically won the war, they killed the most.. And look at Russian tanks, they were legendary, im juss saying i wanna Russian game cuzz i luv Russians<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You idiotic piece of shit.. the only reason the russians didnt get there ass kicked was that the winter saved there ass.. THE WINTER KILLED THE MOST, so go read some more books and then come back here with your childish thinking...

The russians might of had the T-34 tank but it was like the german tiger tank.. it couldnt produce as much, so our shermans out numbered the tiger 10 to 1 or more...

Theres my 2 cents worth


------------------
http://3rdInfantry.homestead.com/fil.../Captblade.jpg

NP, Blade, but we do have to respect Kaiser's opinions. He may be right he may be wrong, but in my opinion the US did have a bigger role. However I can see how each point can be made.

Thank you for respecting my opinion Easy, instead of blurting out crap like Blade.. And did you guys read Partisans post yet? I really helps me out in my case.. I am on my way to look up some ww2 stuff, hopefully find something that will prove me right..

thank you for proving my point Von Paulus and Partisan.. Also WOW ITALY, the only major battle was the Gustav line, and you must remember Italy was the sorriest army out there.. Germany didnt have hundreds of divisons in Africa. Americans and British, Australians and Candians simply overan them. In Russia hundreds of Divisions of Germans were there, Russia pushed them back after Stalingrad all the way to Germany!

Caparzo the Aussies were in WW2, they were very good fighters but to my knowledge they didn't have big numbers. I think they did the main part of their fighting in northern Africa mainly near Egypt I believe. BTW what happened to Bürgen? Did he die in one of those reenactments of his.

I do think the British played a enormous role, although they did have misplaced trust in Monty, who all but wiped out the British 1st Airborne. Now, to the point at hand, the Russkies. They had only two things in their favor, numbers and winter. As I have come to understand it, and correct me if I'm wrong, they also wasted conscripts, used them for clearing minefields and pointless rushes against the Krauts. The Russians didn't win because of skill, just numbers. The Krauts were better soldiers, and I have one figure to prove as such, Russkie dead: 6,115,000 wounded:14,012,000 Kraut dead : (est.)3,300,000 wounded : (est.) 4,605,000. This is from fighting on two fronts as well. This also proves someone's theory, I don't remember who, that the most killed isn't always the winning factor. AND FINALLY, the turning point of WWII was the opening of a second front, losing much needed men and material. Nooch.

------------------
I told you I'd shoot, but you didn't believe me! WHY DIDN'T YOU BELIEVE ME?

[This message has been edited by Kraut Killer (edited July 25, 2001).]

MOre than half of those deaths Kraut are civilians... Russians did have superior numbers and such, but a lotta Russians that were killed were civilians.. Ya gotta remember to AMericans werent the best soldiers ever.. I really give props to British tho, there island will NEVER be invaded..
Hitler and Sealion, Spanish and the Spanish Armada, and some other battles i cannot think of.. I think Napolean tried to take Britian but he failed to.