That's why I posted my first post. It seems like a stupid thing to get to know.

[quote="Doctor Duffy":e2f4b]That's why I posted my first post. It seems like a stupid thing to get to know.[/quote:e2f4b]
That statement in itself is stupid.

College football and professional football are very similar. The main difference is that professional players are paid millions and in alot of players, skill difference. That however doesn't mean gameplay is lacking. Infact, games are more passionate and rivalries are more serious.


ban: plzdie:

baby dick gruff shits on another thread

[quote="Simo Häyhä":81c9d]baby dick gruff shits on another thread[/quote:81c9d]lol

I came to discuss... if theres anyone that fucks over every thread he posts in it's you.

college football is my fav sport followed by NHL then NFL

[quote="Doctor Duffy":688a1]You can enjoy fucking anything. A lot of people enjoy watching faggots peer into eachothers assholes. Especially when you've got real football already airing it doesnt make much sense to me to watch a shitty college game.[/quote:688a1]

How do you define a "shitty" football game? To me, a shitty football game is one that lacks passion, which seems to be the case in nearly every NFL game I watch these days (the Bengals-Ravens game was awesome, though). Not to mention, the parity of the NFL has made nearly every team seem the same. It might as well be called the Generic Football League.

College football, on the other hand, while not having as many great players across the board, is definately a more passionate sport, as the rivalries are literally hundreds of years old in some cases.

[quote="Sicilian_Summers":9c83e][quote="Doctor Duffy":9c83e]You can enjoy fucking anything. A lot of people enjoy watching faggots peer into eachothers assholes. Especially when you've got real football already airing it doesnt make much sense to me to watch a [b]shitty[/b] college game.[/quote:9c83e]

How do you define a "shitty" football game? To me, a shitty football game is one that lacks passion, which seems to be the case in nearly every NFL game I watch these days (the Bengals-Ravens game was awesome, though). Not to mention, the parity of the NFL has made nearly every team seem the same. It might as well be called the Generic Football League.

College football, on the other hand, while not having as many great players across the board, is definately a more passionate sport, as the rivalries are literally hundreds of years old in some cases.[/quote:9c83e]


[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan-Ohio_State_Rivalry"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan-O ... te_Rivalry[/url]

These people like college football cuz they can guarentee which colleges will have the best teams as it NEVER changes...so it's easy to pick a fav team cuz well they will always win regardless cuz thats where promising highschool football players get schlorships

wrong again

Miami U sucks dick this year
Florida St Sucks Dick
Nebraska Suck
Oklahoma Sucks

and you have West Virgina doing great, LSU has turned into a powerhouse

again you fucking suck dick at anything sports

oOo:

Another person who should STFU about something they don't know. The reasons why we like college football has already been stated. On top of that, not everyone is a bandwagon faggot stupid: . As for a guarentee-win, thats never the case. Miami use to be a top football school. Now they are sitting at the bottom of their division. Rutgers is good this year. Boise State is undefeated. FSU, Oklahaoma ect ect


plzdie:

edit: fuck nygger

callvote map mohaa/Pyro_is_gay

LOL gg fucking copy cat biggrin:

nigga stole my thoughts

Hi, my name is Pyro and I have a keyboard and an opinion.

Ditto. You forgot about Louisville, Arkansas, among others. Pyro you really should just fucking kill yourself you nerd.

Dude LSU has been good for the past few years.


Unfortunatley Virginia Tech got knocked out of the top 25, but just got back in with hat win against Clemson.

Explain to me how they can choose who goes to the big game when 8 teams have a perfect record?

When have 8 teams ever wound up with a perfect record at the end of the regular season?

It really isn't that hard to see that, despite being undefeated, Utah and Boise State had no business being in the national championship in 2004.

The legitimate question is how can they choose who goes to the big game when 3 real teams have a perfect record.

As for your comments that the same teams are good every year, that has already been debunked, but there is some degree of truth to it. Despite sucking this year, Miami and Florida State WILL be dominant again, just as Oklahoma had their down period during the 90's [speaking of OU, I'd love to know why you guys think a 1 loss Oklahoma team sucks (fuck Oregon)] and Miami had their first during the mid 90s.

the biggest factor would be streanth of schedule. If you play the good teams it puts you near the top, if you schedule pansy teams you are near the bottom where you belong. As far as teams being good year in and out that is true. There are about a dozen teams that always have good teams but there are reasons for that. When you prove yourself to be one of the best teams year in and year out you get on national TV more. That in turn helps recruting, the talented kids want to be on TV each week because that will help them get into the NFL so the best teams always get the best recruits which in turn makes them one of the best teams again

Arkansas only undefeated in SEC. College Gameday coming to town rock:

Arkansas 5-0 in conference 8-1 over all, that, my friend, is NOT undefeated

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":1f1b6]
Arkansas 5-0 in conference 8-1 over all, that, my friend, is NOT undefeated[/quote:1f1b6]

kthxbye undefeated in the SEC.

[quote="Chronic Diarrhea":b1ba1][quote="Sgt>Stackem":b1ba1]
Arkansas 5-0 in conference 8-1 over all, that, my friend, is NOT undefeated[/quote:b1ba1]

kthxbye undefeated in the SEC.[/quote:b1ba1]

can be read either way fgt.

[quote=Nyck][quote="Chronic Diarrhea":ad912]kthxbye undefeated in the SEC.[/quote:ad912]

can be read either way fgt.[/quote:ad912]

Not when the writer is assuming the readers know what's going on in football.

[quote="Chronic Diarrhea":44cac][quote=Nyck][quote="Chronic Diarrhea":44cac]kthxbye undefeated in the SEC.[/quote:44cac]

can be read either way fgt.[/quote:44cac]

Not when the writer is assuming the readers know what's going on in football.[/quote:44cac]
Still could have been taken a different way. spank:

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":ae3c4]
the biggest factor would be streanth of schedule. If you play the good teams it puts you near the top, if you schedule pansy teams you are near the bottom where you belong. As far as teams being good year in and out that is true. There are about a dozen teams that always have good teams but there are reasons for that. When you prove yourself to be one of the best teams year in and year out you get on national TV more. That in turn helps recruting, the talented kids want to be on TV each week because that will help them get into the NFL so the best teams always get the best recruits which in turn makes them one of the best teams again[/quote:ae3c4]

but how is that fair...not their fault thier schedule was against pansy teams...who knows they couldn've beat the good ones too...

[quote=Pyro]but how is that fair...not their fault thier schedule was against pansy teams...who knows they couldn've beat the good ones too...[/quote:248b9]
Everyone has atleast 1-3 tough games that will prove just how good they are. If that team manages to go undefeated up until they face a good team, they will still probally ranked high. An example of what you are talking about is Rutgers. They had a shitty schedule all year and are currently undefeated but tonight they will be facing another undefeated team.

1 life aint fair

2 teams set thier schedules. So they have total control who they play (out of conference play) al teams play the last 2/3 of thier season in conference (for those in conferences) the other games are set by the teams about 5 or so years in advance

yea Ive noticed to tendency in colleges to screw people over with scheduling

[quote="Chronic Diarrhea":dd7ff][quote=Nyck][quote="Chronic Diarrhea":dd7ff]kthxbye undefeated in the SEC.[/quote:dd7ff]

can be read either way fgt.[/quote:dd7ff]

Not when the writer is assuming the readers know what's going on in football.[/quote:dd7ff]


I know more about football than most, It can be read eother way. I could say Michigan and Ohio State are the only undefeated teams in the Big Ten and that would be true, not some spin to make your team seem better than they are

[quote=Pyro]but how is that fair...not their fault thier schedule was against pansy teams...who knows they couldn've beat the good ones too...[/quote:3652b]
You're like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and asks whats going on.
You dont understand anything about college football and you are too stubborn to listen what these guys are telling you and you are too lazy to do any research on the subject to prevent your retarded statements.

[quote=jujumantb]You're like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and asks whats going on.
You dont understand anything about college football and you are too stubborn to listen what these guys are telling you and you are too lazy to do any research on the subject to prevent your retarded statements.[/quote:35a4c]

[img]http://images.quizilla.com/I/issaray/1035672821_quizwalter.gif[/img]

[quote=jujumantb]You're like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and asks whats going on.
You dont understand anything about college football and you are too stubborn to listen what these guys are telling you and you are too lazy to do any research on the subject to prevent your retarded statements.[/quote:f9350]

No reasearch will prove that it is unfair...why does Univeristy of Michigan deserve the chance to go to the big game every year where other teams even if they destroy everyone are already doomed to failure from the start?

seems as convoluted as bush's foriegn policy.

if I had a crayon font I would use it. It mostly boils down to streanth of schedule. If you play tough teams year in and year out you will become one of the elite dozen or so teams. THE University of Michigan got to where it is because it has eanred it. They have the most wins of any other team, anywhere, they have the best winning % of any team, anywhere. There are a dozen or so teams that have also earned to be where they are. It isnt over 1 year it is over decades of winning aganist tough teams not cupcakes

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":84c9c]


if I had a crayon font I would use it. It mostly boils down to streanth of schedule. If you play tough teams year in and year out you will become one of the elite dozen or so teams. THE University of Michigan got to where it is because it has eanred it. They have the most wins of any other team, anywhere, they have the best winning % of any team, anywhere. There are a dozen or so teams that have also earned to be where they are. It isnt over 1 year it is over decades of winning aganist tough teams not cupcakes[/quote:84c9c]

but a team should matter more about the members of the team, moreso than the legecy of the team itself...


chea.

anyways you explained it the best so far why it works this wya

I don't see what is so complicated. If there are multiple teams that are undefeated, they decide the bowl teams by who they have defeated. If one team beat better (higher ranked) opponents than the other, they get the bid...easy as that.

Signs of Pyro: Dragging politics into an irrelevant thread? CHECK

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":00282]
Arkansas 5-0 in conference 8-1 over all, that, my friend, is NOT undefeated[/quote:00282]

EXcuse me friend, The only team in the SEC without a conference loss. You know what I meant. rolleyes:

We will find out what we are made of this month. Games against LSU and tennesse. If we win 2 of three we will meet Florida for the SEC championsh.ip

Someone on this forums said that the Big East undefeateds would beat eachother. They were right Rutgers 28-Louisville 25.



Dec 2 Rutgers comes to Motown for an awesome game. rock: