The headline was 'A long time coming'

i have my ps3 pre ordered i just hope i get it on launch. if not ill bitch and moan then get my wii 2 days later

With only 400k units its gonna be pretty hard to pick up one in america, the japs must be uber pissed since they get a gay 100k units. oOo:

Find it amazing the ps3 was delayed from spring to november and all they can manage is a paltry 500k units, if they didn't go blu-ray they'd likely have a few million units waiting in the wings, assuming the blu-ray diodes are the only factor thats making the production of these things tortoise speed (according to reports it is). annoy:


And heres some more of the sony spin, xbox 360 REQUIRES a hd-dvd drive. oOo:

http://gaming.engadget.com/2006/10/19/s ... costs-700/

Is that desperation i smell? Yup.

[quote="Chronic Diarrhea":3dba3]
I played a demo of RSV a few weeks ago and the graphics do look that good.[/quote:3dba3]

Demos meant to be out today for that on live. dance:

you guys love to drink your haterade when talking about PS3

honestly...i would of bought a gamecube over an xbox just for Zelda...but they went cell shade and i don't like cell shade...

Im happy iwht my Xbox...has one of thebest games of all systems in KOTOR...reason i bought it...I really only use it for my sports games though...all my good games are for PS2.

As long as the RPG genre is pretty much stricky on sony consoles...sony will be my choice.

I wonder who ill get as my secondary console...WII or Xbox 360...ill see what games are out for it in like 2 years.

Haterade. oOo:

As for zelda .omfg, you being mr zomg graphics dont matter gameplay does, and because zelda had different GRAPHICS you automatically didn't like it? Nice way to totally contradict yourself. biggrin:

Your whole argument of graphics dont matter has been totally debunked,

ty come again. ban: beer:

Good thing there are plenty of good RPGs on the horizon for 360 now dance:

And that 'fact sheet' of sony's? Plain scummy tactics annoy:

[img]http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/1494/42230070defecator203ej5.jpg[/img]

lol...I'm just talking about the Zelda Franchise

why go changing the formula of the best game to come out on any system...during that generation...

only FF7 was close to Ocarina of Time's greatness

and i dislike them telling me about the real Zelda for gamecube and then make it for WII

They didn't change any formula, the gameplay was the same the graphics were different, what you see doesn't affect how the game is played. And last i checked theres no written rule that says zelda games HAVE to look a certain way.

plzdie:

[quote=geRV]Demos meant to be out today for that on live. dance:[/quote:3f52e]

I thought it was a very good demo. I died several times at the start before I got a hang on the controls and how the game plays. The combat is a little more engaging this time around than in previous Tom Clancy games, and quite similar to the way Advanced Warfighter plays out, only in indoor environments.

i'm saying in my opinion they shouldn't of bothered...I don't care about graphics...but I like the realistic look more than the cartoon look.

plzdie:

both statements say the same thing

it's not like they changed from top-down...to whatever you call the style of the N64 zeldas...cuz they needed too...just like how GTA had to do it

but this isn't changng the gameplay...it's changing the graphics to look like it's a cartoon...why?

Both statements do not say the same thing, the second statement says you would have got a cube and zelda over an xbox but the graphics made you not bother, hell of a statement coming from a guy that lives and breaths the supposed "fact" that you dont care about graphics in games.

As for why they changed the graphics, they made link younger so they went with a style they thought suited the younger version. Plenty of people still bought and liked the game regardless of how it looked. And by the way nintendo never stated link would look any different in wind waker, the link that was shown a year or so earlier was part of a tech demo, websites made their own little song and dance about this is how link was definately gonna look in the next game so they misled the public and not nintendo.

lol

and for that move...Nintendo fell to #3...

N64 was so badass! I don't know what they were up too with the cube.

So you're saying 1 game made them lose popularity? oOo:

Nintendo lost popularity mainly because they stuck to their old ideals with the older president of nintendo in charge. Most likely it will change with iwata in charge as he seems to have a better knowledge of what gamers want.

Like the real Zelda!

well, eb games said that they give $60 for the slim ps2 and around $$5-15 for a few of my games. that's basically the taxes on the system right there and still $500 right out of my pocket. loney:

Gonna get it or what?

dont think so, im bidding on a premium package right now on ebay, most likely get out bid, auction ends at like 12 tonight.

seriously, every Zelda game has had a completely different look. Pyro, you are a fool, please stop trying to make big points.

That's not totally true. The two N64 Zelda games looked virtually the same. The GBC Zelda games looked the same. The only games that actually had good, original looks to them were the first Zelda, Zelda for the SNES, and Wind Waker. The GBA Zelda game and the Four Swords game also looked the same. Almost. So yeah, not every single Zelda game looks different, and not all of them are very original.

Xbox has better graphics than the ps2, so it is really better

[quote="Doctor Duffy":a737c]Xbox has better graphics than the ps2, so it is really better[/quote:a737c]

I think MGS 3 looks better than anygame on Xbox.