i say us and iraq get together an dnuke the whoe world

I say George W Bush and Saddam settle their differences in a duel instead of risking the lives of millions. hake:

American soldiers started getting killed in Somalia after,

The 24 Pakistani UN Peacekeepers were killed by Aidid Militia, Washington declares war on Aidid without confering with the Military leaders over in Somalia, A ransom is put on Aidid, So now the US who were originally there as a neutral peacekeeping force, are then 'forced' to go after Aidid, so then Somalians get pissed and think "All along, they just wanted to fuck us over... they were just waiting for a good chance."

It's a real shame, we were actually doing a bangup job over there :(

the muslim holy book, the Quran, calls other religions "infidels" how is that tolerant?

[quote=Argon]Yep I agree with this. Someone tell me why this country got outta doing assasinations? Don't give me ethics or morality bullshit either. We all know a quick one in saddam's head would end this, with no american lives lost.[/quote:66741]

Actually, Bush amended Executive Order 12333 of the american Intelligence Code so that "direct action" could be implemented if an implied threat is perceived against the national security. That was what that precision missile strike was on those Al qaeda officials, basically.

OMG! So many fools here. Islam teaches tolerances but in reality they are probably the most intolerant religion there is. They attack Jerusalem, they attack US, they attack everyone. Not only are they morons but they are hyopcrites too.

In Somalia, the Somalians killed were bad guys for the most part. Militia that were working for Aidid to starve people in Somalia. The US doesnt need to discuss any ransom or war on Aidid with the Somalia Gov (towel heads with rocks) becuase it was our war and HE has no link to THEM.

The Iraqi people for the most part dont like Saddam. If you remember, he gassed his own people, and is a VIOLENT dictator. You say "What about his election?" The election he created to elect a leader of Iraq. Thats true that he had one, but he was the only candidate.

Basically, lets appease Saddam by giving him France, its not like anyone likes those pussy ass, selfish, ungrateful bitches. Not like anyone would have trouble taking over France.....
Ask your local French person this:
-Do you speak german?
-No.
-Your welcome

[quote="[JuGGeRnAuT]":9bbce]
Basically, lets appease Saddam by giving him France, its not like anyone likes those pussy ass, selfish, ungrateful bitches. Not like anyone would have trouble taking over France.....
Ask your local French person this:
-Do you speak german?
-No.
-Your welcome[/quote:9bbce]
So true! biggrin:

who would win?
Hussein is always shooting one weapon or another (mostly AK-47s), so he's got to be a good shot.
Bush is a Texan, nobody can beat a Texan to the draw (as Audie Murphy showed many krauts)

OMG. So you're saying, that you can just go around other peoples countries doing what the fuck you want, and saying it is the "right thing," by not letting the nation's governments know that you are gonna send armed personnel in and tear shit up....? In THEIR country? hake:

just send tripper in he can fix it all hes a god.

YOU ARE SO DUMB! THINK BEFORE YOU THINK THEN TALK!
300,000 people starved to death, we went in to stop it, Aidid starts killing people, We hunt Aidid, AIdid killed us not Somalia gov so we have right to attack whoever the hell we want especially when they are the people that are starving the whole country

I too think these threads are stupid. No way in hell some ghay thread is going to change someones mind about the war, so why even bother? We're going to war whether our US Leaders think its best or not.

Now my contribution.

No one likes War. War is simply.... Hell. People die, which is never good but sometimes war is needed.

I laugh when you guys talk about Somalia & other instances where US forces were used to restore order. Somalia and Iraq are two completely different wars in the bigger picture. Somalia was classified as guerilla war fare in which platoons sent out sparatically are ordered to take out terrorist leaders and make house arrests. In Iraq's case, we're talking about a full pledged war - Armies against Armies. So basically dont compare war with Iraq to Somalia. Yet compare it to WWII or something that involves a super power.

In my opinion, this War is needed. Are we going to need another Pearl Harbor to realize that Saddam is repeating Hitler? How long will it be before Saddam crushes some little nation like hitler did the Rhine Land? Hes got to be stoped, and a bullet to his head will only worsen problems.

I too think these threads are stupid. No way in hell some ghay thread is going to change someones mind about the war, so why even bother? We're going to war whether our US Leaders think its best or not.

Now my contribution.

No one likes War. War is simply.... Hell. People die, which is never good but sometimes war is needed.

I laugh when you guys talk about Somalia & other instances where US forces were used to restore order. Somalia and Iraq are two completely different wars in the bigger picture. Somalia was classified as guerilla war fare in which platoons sent out sparatically are ordered to take out terrorist leaders and make house arrests. In Iraq's case, we're talking about a full pledged war - Armies against Armies. So basically dont compare war with Iraq to Somalia. Yet compare it to WWII or something that involves a super power.

In my opinion, this War is needed. Are we going to need another Pearl Harbor to realize that Saddam is repeating Hitler? How long will it be before Saddam crushes some little nation like hitler did the Rhine Land? Hes got to be stoped, and a bullet to his head will only worsen problems.

double post

Cause by BadScript. You Fucking Suck BadScript.

no one likes war simply lol thats hwy people are for war and against it stupid newb