![]() |
[quote="Old Reliable":6f99e]man, you have absolutely too much time on your hands if you took a screenshot of that.....oh man....rofl.........lol..........[/quote:6f99e]
says the guy with nearly 10000 posts ... [img]http://www.alliedassault.com/phpBB2/images/avatars/42bc3fd53e7406d2938a3.gif[/img] |
taking screenshots....that's just pathetic
|
[quote="Bazooka_Joe":eeebd]
Quote:
I thought we got past all of this earlier today?[/quote:eeebd] You failed to see my point. You cannot reply to a locked thread if it is locked before you try to reply (still bloody annoying because so many of the threads were locked - at least one a day that I would liked to have replied to were locked). These threads I noticed through your advice. What I was refering to was when a thread had just started and I was typing a reply to it, and during the time I was doing so you came in and locked it. So, when I finally did hit the reply button (which would not have been greyed out) I would be informed that said thread was locked. Fine if it happened once or twice, but the frequency that I recall this happening was alarming, to say the least. The other point was in the last paragraph of my post. I want an admin who I can trust to make objective decisions that won't result in the deletion of my account on a whim. I would also like to be warned privately and publicly before being banned. As far as I can see, neiter happened with Tripper, Simo or Judas (definitely not the public warning - the least someone could ask for before they are banned is a final warning where everyone can see it). Whilst I am sure you spent a lot of time helping people out in your time as mod through advice I did not agree with the way you controlled the forums. As I said many times before, a good mod is one you hardly notice is there (in the context as mod). All opinion. My opinion. I just wonder how much it is mirrored here. |
[quote=Ydiss]
Quote:
What I was refering to was when a thread had just started and I was typing a reply to it, and during the time I was doing so you came in and locked it. So, when I finally did hit the reply button (which would not have been greyed out) I would be informed that said thread was locked. Fine if it happened once or twice, but the frequency that I recall this happening was alarming, to say the least. The other point was in the last paragraph of my post. I want an admin who I can trust to make objective decisions that won't result in the deletion of my account on a whim. I would also like to be warned privately and publicly before being banned. As far as I can see, neiter happened with Tripper, Simo or Judas (definitely not the public warning - the least someone could ask for before they are banned is a final warning where everyone can see it). Whilst I am sure you spent a lot of time helping people out in your time as mod through advice I did not agree with the way you controlled the forums. As I said many times before, a good mod is one you hardly notice is there (in the context as mod). All opinion. My opinion. I just wonder how much it is mirrored here.[/quote:f80ac] Do you fail to see a reason why they should not have been locked? At least 1/2 of the frontpage threads of Offtopic would have been locked already, do you not see why? |
This is only because this is huge stuff. Its interesting. And they SHOULDNT be totally locked from discussion, simply joined into one thread. Knowing you though - "OMG!!!111 I'm the king how can u not love me! no more talk about this!!1 - loct. heel. . .i mean hill...i mean - fuck it!"
Spin. Spin. Spin joe. Your version of events is still changing. If we were in court, you'd be convicted now. |
[quote="Bazooka_Joe":5ad7b][quote=Ydiss]
Quote:
What I was refering to was when a thread had just started and I was typing a reply to it, and during the time I was doing so you came in and locked it. So, when I finally did hit the reply button (which would not have been greyed out) I would be informed that said thread was locked. Fine if it happened once or twice, but the frequency that I recall this happening was alarming, to say the least. The other point was in the last paragraph of my post. I want an admin who I can trust to make objective decisions that won't result in the deletion of my account on a whim. I would also like to be warned privately and publicly before being banned. As far as I can see, neiter happened with Tripper, Simo or Judas (definitely not the public warning - the least someone could ask for before they are banned is a final warning where everyone can see it). Whilst I am sure you spent a lot of time helping people out in your time as mod through advice I did not agree with the way you controlled the forums. As I said many times before, a good mod is one you hardly notice is there (in the context as mod). All opinion. My opinion. I just wonder how much it is mirrored here.[/quote:5ad7b] Do you fail to see a reason why they should not have been locked? At least 1/2 of the frontpage threads of Offtopic would have been locked already, do you not see why?[/quote:5ad7b] Refer to my post on one of the other threads. Done with this one. |
[quote="ED!":5aece]This is only because this is huge stuff. Its interesting. And they SHOULDNT be totally locked from discussion, simply joined into one thread. Knowing you though - "OMG!!!111 I'm the king how can u not love me! no more talk about this!!1 - loct. heel. . .i mean hill...i mean - fuck it!"
Spin. Spin. Spin joe. Your version of events is still changing. If we were in court, you'd be convicted now.[/quote:5aece] If I were in court the baliff would of thrown you in a straightjacket by now. |
IMO, Zoner was a good mod, he helped, he was nice and he doesn't think he's better than everyone else because of his post count
|
[quote="Higher Power":39474]IMO, Zoner was a good mod, he helped, he was nice and he doesn't think he's better than everyone else because of his post count[/quote:39474]
And you would be? |
/me hands Higher Power that $10 he promised him. biggrin:
|
[quote="ED!":e621c][quote="Higher Power":e621c]IMO, Zoner was a good mod, he helped, he was nice and he doesn't think he's better than everyone else because of his post count[/quote:e621c]
And you would be?[/quote:e621c] An innocent bystander. |
. . .ah ha. Sure. Your regdate and sig show a complete impartiality.
|
lmao, think some more, maybe you'll find the answer
|
[quote="Higher Power":48bed]lmao, think some more, maybe you'll find the answer[/quote:48bed]
That would presume some deeper penetrating interest in who you are. There isnt. Name alone could infer many many things, but personally I dont go off of assumptions. If you're someone important - gg on slipping behind a screenname. If not, gg on pumping yourself up. Either way just another "bystander" willing to toss his two cents in. |
basically yes, and the name is a Boston song
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.