Alliedassault - Kerry on Letterman

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)

- Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)

- - Kerry on Letterman (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=40535)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman

i think i have the right to call myself champ of consecutive post count if I'm not mistaken.

9 you didnt do it all on your own!

plus, i dont think youve beat the record... didnt scalping or someone get a ton?

Quote:

Originally Posted by fujimi7su

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman

i think i have the right to call myself champ of consecutive post count if I'm not mistaken.

9 you didnt do it all on your own!

plus, i dont think youve beat the record... didnt scalping or someone get a ton?

ha, i wouldn't doubt that someone took the time to do more than 57 posts in a row.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman

Quote:

Originally Posted by fujimi7su

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman

i think i have the right to call myself champ of consecutive post count if I'm not mistaken.

9 you didnt do it all on your own!

plus, i dont think youve beat the record... didnt scalping or someone get a ton?

ha, i wouldn't doubt that someone took the time to do more than 57 posts in a row.

Maple did 70+ in the sig forum rock:

Quote:

Originally Posted by strvs

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman

Quote:

Originally Posted by fujimi7su

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman

i think i have the right to call myself champ of consecutive post count if I'm not mistaken.

9 you didnt do it all on your own!

plus, i dont think youve beat the record... didnt scalping or someone get a ton?

ha, i wouldn't doubt that someone took the time to do more than 57 posts in a row.

Maple did 70+ in the sig forum rock:

lmao

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fireal

Scalp had 2000

!!!! lol !!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noctis

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noctis

1) Economics. Anyone with even a basic college education can tell you this. The Republican stance on the economy is simply better. Politics and all that aside, you'd be hard-pressed to find an economist who isn't working for the DNC that will tell you that the economy will improve under Kerry.

Do you have links that say the economy under bush is better than under the clinton administration? Since we don't really know if kerry would improve the economy because it hasn't happened yet, all we can really do is compare republican to democrat stats. And i'd be interested to see the numbers from 2000 compared to 2004.

That's a faulty argument, though. The economy began recession prior to George Bush even taking office. Artificially inflating the numbers in the economy with trade agreements like NAFTA and the 2000 agreement with China completely destabilized the economy. Bottom-line, economists are saying that repealing the tax cuts will shock the stock market and send us right back into a downward spiral rather than an upward one. But the problem is that Kerry wants to dump everything into socialist programs, programs which drink budgets for an afternoon shake and have little to no return.

Ok, so lets assume that Clinton headed the country into a recession when George took over. Is the country still in a recession, or has bush turned it around? Are there numbers that say the numbers are higher now and Bush has taken the country out of the recession? Have tax cuts made the economy better? And at what cost?

If taxes are cut, there are obviously less funds for the Government to work with. That, coupled with an expensive war probably leaves the government with even less money. So what suffers? Education? Healthcare? People living around the poverty line? Are social programs that evil that people would rather have cuts made to them instead of being taxed to pay for them?

Don't make me but in about econmics.

Greenspan is an amazing individual. This man has such a burden on his shoulders that no one else can handle with such ease. He has seen every trend and taken care of many economically problems. Recessions are always going to be around simply because they keep a Capitalistic economy booming. How can you gain money if you don't spend a bit?

Also ninty the president's biggest influence on the econmy is making the budget. You can't blame the economy problems completely on the man (OH NO DEMOCRAT TALKING WELL ABOUT BUSH!!!). Yes he made bad decisions but our economy problems can be forseen from years away. The only way Bush could of filled the dent in the economy was to not have a war in Iraq. However, the failing corporations, sluggish stock market, etc. cannot be blamed on him. Free enterprise is controlled by the people. Yes there is corruption and red tape that controls practices, yet people seem to survive. GDP proves nothing, the Dow Jones proves nothing; material and the common man having a feeling of comfort in the economy. Sad? Yes, but thats just the way we view things these days.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman

i think i have the right to call myself champ of consecutive post count if I'm not mistaken.

I cleaned up the crap. Sorry to ruin zee fun.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoner

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coleman

i think i have the right to call myself champ of consecutive post count if I'm not mistaken.

I cleaned up the crap. Sorry to ruin zee fun.

no problemo. Danke beer:

Vance's 24 gg post < Colemon's 84 post gg < Maple's 93 gg post < Short's 180 gg Post < Scalps 2000 Posts in one thread.

[img]http://phreeque.tripod.com/jandal_sisters.JPG[/img]