i fail to see any justification for that statement. dan's a pretty cool guy.

I don't find any fault in thinking that the guy did a stupid move by carrying around a pound of weed as he drove with illegal defects in his car. I wouldn't even drive with alcohol in the car as a minor with a broken tail light. If someone wanst to be a superhero and cry that they are a victim of the law, then go ahead.

Seems the main focus got lost here. Let me reiterate:

Situation: Girl tells Jotun about her guy fuck friend getting caught with pot. Jotun says the guy's an ass, girl gets her panties in a bunch.

End Result: Girl was getting cocked by pot head and wanted sympathy from Jotun and didn't get it.

THATS the bottom line. Time for everyone to move on.

Why must a thread remain ontopic if it produces another perfectly good and equally/more interesting topic?

beer:

........and what interesting topic might that be?

The one that people where replying to for 3 and a half pages until you rerouted it back to it's already done topic.

.........again, which interesting topic?

It's obviously interesting to people if there's replys being made to it. Just because you don't necessarily care for it doesn't mean there's other people with that much less time in their day to argue about it.

Just like now, we've created our own topic, the topic of what an interesting topic is. Get it? Not interesting to really anybody but us, but we're still replying.

You do realize the difference between an interesting topic and a flame fest don't you?

It's all the same to me. What defines a flame fest?

This is very much an interesting topic, not a flame fest.

And if you want what topic it is, the topic would be the rationale of following laws simply because they're the law, as well as the morality of marijuana and marijuana use.

Well, since you asked.....just a few of your words here qualify.

But they're not offhanded insults they're relevant to his post and/or belief.

ok, if you say so. It seems we see things a bit differently.