It seems those "seals" have some kind of small pp syndrome which requires them to make huge signatures to make up for their inadequate 2nd-grade spelling and one line comments.

By the way, I predict you childish lamers will reply seeming that arguing on forums is your way of making up that daily allotment os soap opera drama. Don't bother, I don't read these hardly ever.

Hmm, well JWeber, why don't you check your own grammar before you flame someone. Nothing personal, but it's not the way to have anyone really listen to you.

I think as long as you can keep your sig under 100k and it doesn't cause the dreaded scroll (at 1024x768 or above), it shouldn't be a problem. Just follow the rules and shut up. Does anyone know how many pixels wide a sig would have to be to make you have to scroll at 1024 or 800x600?

Shut up Rocket. Was I talking to you? For your information professer, I was writing in speech format, not some thesis paper BS. Maybe this is why you sound like such a boring moron. You allied peice of sheisse.

i think there should be a limit @ the pixels ... like 2 of Zoner91's sigs on eachother should be the limit ! (or like mine is biggrin:)

Or Hollywood's, also a nice size ...

The Horizontal size isn't a problem i think ...

Besides, when there's a limit in Vertical size, they'll ruin it when they do it in horizontal size ! biggrin:

bravo bravo, very maturely done.

You just said you usually read them.
I rest my case.