![]() |
It seems those "seals" have some kind of small pp syndrome which requires them to make huge signatures to make up for their inadequate 2nd-grade spelling and one line comments.
By the way, I predict you childish lamers will reply seeming that arguing on forums is your way of making up that daily allotment os soap opera drama. Don't bother, I don't read these hardly ever. |
Quote:
|
I think as long as you can keep your sig under 100k and it doesn't cause the dreaded scroll (at 1024x768 or above), it shouldn't be a problem. Just follow the rules and shut up. Does anyone know how many pixels wide a sig would have to be to make you have to scroll at 1024 or 800x600?
|
Shut up Rocket. Was I talking to you? For your information professer, I was writing in speech format, not some thesis paper BS. Maybe this is why you sound like such a boring moron. You allied peice of sheisse.
|
i think there should be a limit @ the pixels ... like 2 of Zoner91's sigs on eachother should be the limit ! (or like mine is biggrin:)
Or Hollywood's, also a nice size ... The Horizontal size isn't a problem i think ... Besides, when there's a limit in Vertical size, they'll ruin it when they do it in horizontal size ! biggrin: |
Quote:
bravo bravo, very maturely done. |
Quote:
I rest my case. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.