Alliedassault
Page 4 of 5 123 4 5
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Hicks and their guns (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=49858)

[DAS REICH] Blitz 12-20-2005 08:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
but the actual legality of a civilian to buy a gun, i mean fair enough if the police would have them to use against force of people who use them aswell, but selling guns to any random hick or dick or harry just adds to the problem.
Clarity of thought and sentence structure are important.
Ignoring what i am saying and focusing on any grammatical errors isnt important, unless you voted for Bush because being ignorant should come natural to you.
stop crying

TonyMontana 12-20-2005 08:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machette
Out of curiosity how many guns do you own?
I have:
an Auto-Ordnance 1911 .45 cal
a 1936 German Luger that my Dad gave me
a .30-'06 rifle w/scope
and a lever action pellet rifle

Still at my Dad's house, but that he has given to me, I have:
a 20 gauge shotgun
a 12 gauge shotgun
an 18 gauge shotgun
a .410 gauge shotgun
and a .38 cal revolver

(I might not get to keep the .410 since it was really a gift that he gave my sister on her 14th birthday)

at my father-in-law's house (again, he has said they are mine someday) there is:

two matching black powder revolvers (replicas of - 1860 Army Colt and 1851 Navy Colt)
a new Colt SA Army that was given to my father-in-law by the bank he works for when he reached his 50th anniversary with the bank.

a M1 Carbine

a .38 revolver

a .22 revolver

a .410 double-barrel shotgun that is about 50 years old

a .22 lever action rifle

a P-38 pistol

and ... hmmmm ... I guess that's about it. Might be a couple that I missed
you have more firepower then the canadian army

Johnj 12-20-2005 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
but the actual legality of a civilian to buy a gun, i mean fair enough if the police would have them to use against force of people who use them aswell, but selling guns to any random hick or dick or harry just adds to the problem.
Clarity of thought and sentence structure are important.
Ignoring what i am saying and focusing on any grammatical errors isnt important, unless you voted for Bush because being ignorant should come natural to you.
I'm not ignoring what you have to say, I’m having trouble decoding the gibberish. Perhaps someone would pay attention to what you have to say, if you didn't sound like an idiot.

elstatec 12-20-2005 08:58 PM
sleeping: ignorance.

Johnj 12-20-2005 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
sleeping: ignorance.
You could fix that by attending a school.

Whatada 12-20-2005 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
sleeping: ignorance.
You could fix that by attending a school.
SLAGGED.

elstatec 12-20-2005 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
sleeping: ignorance.
You could fix that by attending a school.

You could fix that by making a good use of your gun by shooting yourself in the cranium.

Johnj 12-20-2005 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatico
You could fix that by making a good use of your gun by shooting myself in the cranium.
A complete sentence. See you can do it. Now go stab yourself in the eye.

Short Hand 12-20-2005 11:25 PM
Fouck coherentt engrish.

Blase 12-21-2005 12:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnj
Quote:
Originally Posted by elstatec
sleeping: ignorance.
You could fix that by attending a school.

You could fix that by making a good use of your gun by shooting yourself in the cranium.
Then perhaps you can turn the gun on yourself and be twice as useful as you are now.

SoLiDUS 12-21-2005 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machette
Out of curiosity how many guns do you own?
I own three handguns that I use for recreational target shooting and plan on starting competitive IPSC later next year if the Liberals don't win and ban our firearms. Unless they're in use at the range, I keep them all trigger-locked in a safe outside of prying eyes. I'm a safe shooter, I advocate safe usage and responsible manipulation at all times: this sport is no more dangerous than countless others and I refuse to accept bans and restrictions as valid strategies to thwart criminals from acquiring them. Complete bullshit...

I will reiterate the following: read up on the facts and statistics before spouting off tired, false and ultimately damaging things that end up hurting only one group of people... the law-abiding.

Short Hand 12-21-2005 03:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoLiDUS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machette
Out of curiosity how many guns do you own?
I own three handguns that I use for recreational target shooting and plan on starting competitive IPSC later next year if the Liberals don't win and ban our firearms. Unless they're in use at the range, I keep them all trigger-locked in a safe outside of prying eyes. I'm a safe shooter, I advocate safe usage and responsible manipulation at all times: this sport is no more dangerous than countless others and I refuse to accept bans and restrictions as valid strategies to thwart criminals from acquiring them. Complete bullshit...

I will reiterate the following: read up on the facts and statistics before spouting off tired, false and ultimately damaging things that end up hurting only one group of people... the law-abiding.
Move to America.......... If you livesd in Toronto you would understand why anti gun laws seem to be soo appealing... I hate having to drive down threw Jane and see another person fucking shot dead on my way to University, it really fucking sickens me. I could really careless how abiding you are, the fact is their are people out there killing with them. (for the record, I have no problem with hunting rifles/ rec rifles./bolt action)

Colonel 12-21-2005 06:51 AM
[quote="Short Hand":efd11]........ If you livesd in Toronto you would understand why anti gun laws seem to be soo appealing... I hate having to drive down threw Jane and see another person fucking shot dead on my way to University, ... [/quote:efd11]

Short Hand, the point is that even if you ban guns you will still see what you are seeing, and in some areas where it has been tried, they have seen more of it.

SoLiDUS 12-21-2005 06:51 AM
The people killing with them

1- Never had a license to begin with
2- Illegally acquired the firearm...
2a) ... which was smuggled into the country
3) would've used anything else to accomplish their goal

You don't seem to understand that banning handguns will do NOTHING to curtail the murders your gangbangers commit: only tougher policing and sentencing will do this. Alternately, send in the JTF2 and get it over with once and for all... but you probably won't approve of the latter as it's too drastic for politically correct monkeys. You have to agree though: it would send out one hell of a message...

CoMaToSe 12-21-2005 11:35 AM
The vast majority of firearms used in crimes are obtained illegally, are illegal to even own in the US (so called 'assault weapons') and by banning the legal use of firearms, you give these people free reign to terrorize defensless citizens

And isnt it funny how they always turn to the 'ignorant' arguement when they have nothing better to say? 'Your ignorant because you diont agree with my CLEARLY superior and wordly views' oOo:

geRV 12-21-2005 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
a M1 Carbine
I could fart in your mouth and it would be more lethal than that pos. biggrin:

Art Attack 12-21-2005 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoLiDUS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machette
Out of curiosity how many guns do you own?
I own three handguns that I use for recreational target shooting and plan on starting competitive IPSC later next year if the Liberals don't win and ban our firearms. Unless they're in use at the range, I keep them all trigger-locked in a safe outside of prying eyes. I'm a safe shooter, I advocate safe usage and responsible manipulation at all times: this sport is no more dangerous than countless others and I refuse to accept bans and restrictions as valid strategies to thwart criminals from acquiring them. Complete bullshit...

I will reiterate the following: read up on the facts and statistics before spouting off tired, false and ultimately damaging things that end up hurting only one group of people... the law-abiding.
VOTE LIBERAL!

Pyro 12-21-2005 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
A guns purpose is to harm or kill. No if ands or buts about it. Do you really truly believe guns were designed to be a tool in a recreational activity...?
Actually there are guns designed specifically for target shooting (a recreational activity). No harm. No kill. There are guns designed to fire smoke cartridges. No harn. No kill. My father used a gun to save his life and never fired it. No harm to anyone, but it saved his life.

A gun is designed to shoot bullets. How you use it says more about your purpose than it does the gun's.

As for us being a more peaceful country without guns, I doubt it.

1. I would be an orphan.
2. Cities that have banned guns have seen an increase in crime.
3. Poverty levels and drug use rates have more to do with crime rates than the amount of guns available.
And I wouldn't exist if guns didn't exist?

Well...and Hitler...but no guns...no world war II...no me.

Pyro 12-21-2005 04:51 PM
Well...I never said I wanted to ban firearms...im just saying if they never were invented we would be better off...we just have to deal with the ignorance of the past...banning firearms is pointless...but it is what ontarians want to hear...even though it isn't a solution.

Still...anything is better than Harper in office.

Colonel 12-21-2005 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Well...and Hitler...but no guns...no world war II...no me.
Still would be you, because hitler, like Attila, would have tried to conquer the world with whatever weapons he can get his hands on. ;)

Pyro 12-21-2005 04:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Well...and Hitler...but no guns...no world war II...no me.
Still would be you, because hitler, like Attila, would have tried to conquer the world with whatever weapons he can get his hands on. ;)
wouldn't of had as much access...mass killings...shit like that....but who knows he probably still could of took poland...i just like that we put up more of a fight than france who was way bigger.

strvs 12-21-2005 04:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Well...and Hitler...but no guns...no world war II...no me.
Still would be you, because hitler, like Attila, would have tried to conquer the world with whatever weapons he can get his hands on. ;)
wouldn't of had as much access...mass killings...shit like that....but who knows he probably still could of took poland...i just like that we put up more of a fight than france who was way bigger.
wallbash:

Simo Häyhä 12-21-2005 05:10 PM
[img]http://www.enterstageright.com/images/guncontrol.gif[/img]


cliche' happy:

Coleman 12-21-2005 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Well...I never said I wanted to ban firearms...im just saying if they never were invented we would be better off...we just have to deal with the ignorance of the past...banning firearms is pointless...but it is what ontarians want to hear...even though it isn't a solution.

Still...anything is better than Harper in office.
lol, if we never made fire arms, we'd be at the same point where we are today. But instead of pointing a muzzle at the Indian in the 7-11, you'd be holding a knife to his throat. That's a silly way of thinking Pryo.

Pyro 12-21-2005 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Well...I never said I wanted to ban firearms...im just saying if they never were invented we would be better off...we just have to deal with the ignorance of the past...banning firearms is pointless...but it is what ontarians want to hear...even though it isn't a solution.

Still...anything is better than Harper in office.
lol, if we never made fire arms, we'd be at the same point where we are today. But instead of pointing a muzzle at the Indian in the 7-11, you'd be holding a knife to his throat. That's a silly way of thinking Pryo.
Oh trust me...i bet you anything i could shoot some fucker in his face easier than me...all 130 pounds of me...stabbing some 300 pound dud ein the neck.

It makes killing EASIER...thats what a gun does.

Whatada 12-21-2005 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Oh trust me...i bet you anything i could shoot some fucker in his face easier than me...all 130 pounds of me...stabbing some 300 pound dud ein the neck.

It makes killing EASIER...thats what a gun does.
The fucking numbskull to responsible gun owner ratio is about 5:1. oOo:

Doctor Duffy 12-21-2005 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Oh trust me...i bet you anything i could shoot some fucker in his face easier than me...all 130 pounds of me...stabbing some 300 pound dud ein the neck.

It makes killing EASIER...thats what a gun does.
The fucking numbskull to responsible gun owner ratio is about 5:1. oOo:
Make that six.

SoLiDUS 12-21-2005 06:16 PM
[quote="Art Attack":39337]
VOTE LIBERAL![/quote:39337]

Shut the fuck up, Art.

Whatada 12-21-2005 06:21 PM
[quote="Doctor Duffy":0013c]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Oh trust me...i bet you anything i could shoot some fucker in his face easier than me...all 130 pounds of me...stabbing some 300 pound dud ein the neck.

It makes killing EASIER...thats what a gun does.
The fucking numbskull to responsible gun owner ratio is about 5:1. oOo:
Make that six.[/quote:0013c] Just stop, you fucking twat.

-1

SoLiDUS 12-21-2005 06:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Well...I never said I wanted to ban firearms...im just saying if they never were invented we would be better off...we just have to deal with the ignorance of the past...banning firearms is pointless...but it is what ontarians want to hear...even though it isn't a solution.

Still...anything is better than Harper in office.

Relatively little critical thinking and simple logic destroy your "what if", but since you ask so nicely:

http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel120501.shtml

Doctor Duffy 12-21-2005 06:25 PM
[quote=Whatada]
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Doctor Duffy":f4057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyro
Oh trust me...i bet you anything i could shoot some fucker in his face easier than me...all 130 pounds of me...stabbing some 300 pound dud ein the neck.

It makes killing EASIER...thats what a gun does.
The fucking numbskull to responsible gun owner ratio is about 5:1. oOo:
Make that six.
Just stop, you fucking twat.[/quote:f4057]

LOL WHAT??

If theres a shrimp on these forums, rofl, its YOU. Somewhere along the lines I think you got confused...

Oh yeah, to add to the conversation.... . . I thinketh guns kill.

12-21-2005 06:27 PM
You are both small in the pants, now make up or leave.

Whatada 12-21-2005 06:28 PM
Duffy, you've got to be one of the most retarded fuckers ever.

What asshole told you that a twat was a shrimp? spank:

Doctor Duffy 12-21-2005 06:29 PM
I will accept an apology by form of shirtless pics from Whatada.

lol, how did this reach 10 pages? Dont you think its gotta be moved to politics?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatada
What asshole told you that a twat was a shrimp? spank:
Who told you it wasnt?

Whatada 12-21-2005 06:34 PM
The entire of mankind, you ignorant shit.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=twat

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=twat


Quit making an ass of yourself.

SoLiDUS 12-21-2005 06:34 PM
It reaches more people here and serves to educate the ignorant on a very important issue. Duffy, stop posting tangential shit in this thread...

However, your post gives me an idea. Every canadian member here: why the HELL would you be voting Liberal again in the face of all the scandals, corruption and empty promises ? You're the reason we're in so much shit now. For fuck's sake, wake up!

Whatada 12-21-2005 06:42 PM
Ignorant people take away potentially dangerous privaleges from responsible people. That's the way society works.

"NOPE. THAT BLOKE STABBED A MAN IN THE EYE. WE REVOKE YOUR RIGHT TO A KNIFE."

"NOPE. THAT BLOKE THREW HIMSELF FROM THE BUILDING. NO MORE ROOF ACCESS."

"NOPE. THAT BLOKE FORGOT TO OPEN HIS PARACHUTE. NO MORE BASE JUMPING."

It goes on. As long as there are dumb people, things will be banned. hake:

Doctor Duffy 12-21-2005 06:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoLiDUS
It reaches more people here and serves to educate the ignorant on a very important issue. Duffy, stop posting tangential shit in this thread...
Rofl, thats what my dad always tells me what I am... never understood, though.

Well, thats all fine and dandy, but still if you havent noticed, this is kinda a website for adolescent young males to have virtual sex and talk about murder-simulators with one another, not really discuss political issues and stuff...

....but its happening and I dont care. And its kinda funny too see Whatada try to sound smart.

Whatada 12-21-2005 06:55 PM
At least I don't think a vagina is a shrimp, now do I?

Shut up, and go to another fucking forum, because being obnoxious is all you're good for. hake:

TonyMontana 12-21-2005 07:45 PM
you two are stupid fucks. most times i would delete all the bullshit posts, but if you think i'm wasting my time on duffy and whatada, you got another thing coming.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 AM.
Page 4 of 5 123 4 5
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.