Iran would is most likely not developing nuclear arms, and if thwey did......They are not fucking retarded enough to use them.

[quote="Short Hand":2a2f9]Iran would is most likely not developing nuclear arms, and if thwey did......They are not fucking retarded enough to use them.[/quote:2a2f9]maybe a scientist that understands the power of the nuke...but not some crazy wack-o muslim terrorist that breaks into the facility and sets it off.

you know you just made shorthand look smarter than you, which is a really hard thing todo.

COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKIE oOo:

it's called an analogy, and you're an idiot for thinking this is the same as WWII. I'm with Coleman, this is stupid. Most of the world has the same opinion on this, even many European countries, I'm not gonna argue it with one person who has a different opinion.

if britain,france,russia or whoever developed the bomb first,they wouldnt even have given nagasaki a couple of days left to live - they prolly would have dropped it the same day as hiroshima blew up. you need to let ww2 go, dude, it was over 60 years ago and it saved millions of allied and japanese lives. the nuclear club is big enough as it is, no one else should have a "right" to make them - its getting out of hand. they should be dismantling them, not making more. you can preach fairness all you want - i think iran is not trustworthy enough to have nuclear technology because they would most definately try and make a bomb. i know thats just my opinion, but i think most people (or at least half for arguments sake) agree.

Japan was attempting to surrender.......

wtf,they couldnt pick up the phone? if they were trying,they didnt try hard enough, man. if you see a city blow up like that,you would think they would have rang us up on the horn or something. tough shit.

I woulda nuked those suckers 4x...

Anyhoo, fact is Tony Blair or GW wouldn't come out infront of the world one day & say they want to destroy a country just for the hell of it. But that's just what the chap incharge of Iran said about Israel a few months ago...

You think a guy like that should have nukes even in the name of fairness? rolleyes:

did i say this was the same as WW2, no you are the idiot for thinking so, i just mentioned the only 2 nukes that have been used on humans as you asked 'do you honestly think any of those countries would actually use nuclear weapons?' so why the fuck do you think I said it, and it doesnt matter if it happened 60 years ago, they are still the only time nuclear weapons have been used so is of huge importances, and you and Madmartagen are trying to shift it to the side as if it does not matter.

But give up then, be with Coleman, be so shit deep in the ignorance of what is actually going on here and go to bed little boy.

President Truman rejected the offers, he wanted to show Stalin a little heat.

[quote="Short Hand":a5fd8]Japan was attempting to surrender.......

President Truman rejected the offers, he wanted to show Stalin a little heat.[/quote:a5fd8]

We've been over this several times before, have you found any credible sources to back up this claim yet?

You and Elstat should run away from home and join the Iranian Army. I heard they are looking for some volunteers.

wow, don't be a douche and start taking jabs at people below the belt.

I guess I'm just one of those ignorant Americans with a realistic view of the world. sleeping:

elstatec
please email George W Bush with your GPS location

realistic hahahahaha.

ahahahaha. I'm not giving up, I'm just not gonna argue with someone who is beyond reasoning. And you did compare it to WW2, you brought in the fact that the US is the only country to have used the bomb and tried to make that seem related to what we are talking about now...that's a comparison...

ww2 was much more than 2 bombs, and as said those 2 bombs are greatly related as the argument involves nuclear weapons, and well these are the only ones used, but try and ignore that fact then and be above reason, fool.

its like comparing a Model T to a Mustang

you brought up ww2 mang, i was trying to keep it on the issue of trust. I dotn trust Iran with nuclear technology. thats my reasoning by it. I dont trust Bush, thats for sure; but i dont have to be a supporter of him or our govt to make up my own mind about Iran.

oh, and you of course are an expert with inside knowledge of the real motivation behind irans actions, erm no...so stfu

ps: and stop resorting to name calling when peoples views differ from your own...you whiney little cunt.

[quote:4c1a3]ps: and stop resorting to name calling when peoples views differ from your own...you whiney little cunt. [/quote:4c1a3]


stupid: sleeping:

this is all einstein's fault.

maybe now all you specilating ignorant bastards will shut up

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle ... 649182.stm

Whats that prove, china a country which has never really ever backed western appeals, and who has its hand DEEP into Iran oil, is scared shitless of losing that supply and wonders what other Mid East Countries would think of its decsion to back sanctions. Therefore it makes the decsion to not bite the hand that feeds them and risk losing oil.

sleeping:

no its with the plans to enrich uranium in Russia which the situation is about, you know the way you make nuclear weapons, that apparently Iran plan to even though they clearly stated otherwise.


but then again lets hope this situation doesnt get resolved, so sanctions get put in place, and i will laugh when you pay shit loads for your gas


sleeping: