![]() |
Quote:
Third rate? It's a journal published across the entire nation and can be found in most major university libraries. Mmmmkay. And of course it's right if I post it. |
I thought the Nazis were fascists? cool:
|
[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":e003c]I thought the Nazis were fascists? cool:[/quote:e003c]
Yes they were. The Nazi party, or NSDAP, stands for the National Socialist German Workers Party. They are both socialists and fascists. |
[quote=Madmartagen]
Quote:
Aye. Kind of funny how the Germans called themselves "Socialists" yet Hitler HATED the Russians... "socialism" is a Russian theory. |
[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":fd88e][quote=Madmartagen]
Quote:
Aye. Kind of funny how the Germans called themselves "Socialists" yet Hitler HATED the Russians... "socialism" is a Russian theory.[/quote:fd88e] Socialism is a German-French theory actually, Karl Marx was a kraut and I think Engels lived in France. I understand that to have "true" socialism you need to have the means of production be owned by the government (suposedly in the interest of the people). I understood from reading WWII books that Germany still had privately owned companies before and during WWII, so they were not really socialists. So even with progressive taxes we are not "spiralling into socialism" |
Engels was a kraut too. And the germans were "national socialist" which is a far right version of socialism also known as "facism" . The german state controled everything, every aspect of peoples life. The germans did not hate socialist, they hated communist, because they felt that world bolshevism and world judiasm went hand in hand.
and btw i havent been reading the other pages how the hell did a topic on bush geting elected turn to what govt the nazis had?? |
[quote:e251e]because they felt that world bolshevism and world judiasm went hand in hand. [/quote:e251e]
How are they alike? I believe the Bolshevik party were athiests and actually stripped religion from the culture... unless Stalin did that, not really sure. |
[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":551ce][quote:551ce]because they felt that world bolshevism and world judiasm went hand in hand. [/quote:551ce]
How are they alike? I believe the Bolshevik party were athiests and actually stripped religion from the culture... unless Stalin did that, not really sure.[/quote:551ce] its called propaganda, sort of like the more extremeist Mid East countries say that the US government (both Republicans and Democrats) are really working for the Jews rolleyes: |
[quote=Zoner]
Quote:
Yes, that's why I thought it was funny. |
Quote:
Where to start....lets see.. Sure, the rich do much of the investing, but retirement plans, 401k and other related investments are now mostly funded thru employee plans, meaning the middle class. And even when its the rich investing directly instead of thru the markets, they get tax breaks. THATS why they invest in this sector, trust me, its not out of philantropic tendencies. Nice attempt to deflect the truth there. And income on investments is taxed at a fixed cap gains percentage, lower than the "upper classes" base rate. Lose half their money to taxes???? This is the worst statement you have made. The highest tax bracket is nowhere near 50%, its closer to 35%. And its not half their money, its half there taxable income. So someone can never lose the principle to taxes. No riches to rags scenario there, unless the riches are plain dumb. You also conveniently left out the part about progressive taxation. The rich are taxed for their first 100,000 income exactly the same rate as the guy that only makes 100k. They are taxed at higher rates on only the amounts over that particular bracket. Good attempt to deflect the real issues and good use of very exagerated numbers. Now to address the accusations that everyone but you is ignorant. Economics is ALL theory. And there are lots of theories out there. Just because someone doenst subscribe to the same one as some random bellhop, doesnt mean they are ignorant, especially when the theories are mixed with politics. The excessive use of name calling in your threads takes away from any credibility you may or may not have. |
Well,
I can't vote yet but i would if i could. He has ade a huge diffrence unlike bill.
He is anti-terroism which is the best thing you can be and Fight it for our freedom, He did something right after sept 11 to protect us and if you don't like him. Think what he did for the american people protecting you ass so you can live not talk bad things about this great guy. I would think you have no heart if you don't like him. Bush is like regan to great guys |
Re: Well,
Quote:
|
Ralph Nader 4 life
|
Quote:
|
Once again the people of American must choose from duche bag #1 or duche bag #2. I for one am not gonna bother until there are some REAL people on the ballot worth voting for. I cant bitch so I don't. I don't vote because why vote for either one when I know they are just a bunch of arrogant pompus jackasses that sucked mommas titty too long so they think everyone owes them something? All they do is throw around their weight and never solve a fucking thing.
As for waiting for the REAL people to show up on the ballot.... let's just say I prob won't be voting for the rest of my life on Presidential Elections. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.