![]() |
This thread is roflsaurus.
Nothing against you nyck, i simply said it to get a reaction out of you. I hope your marriage goes well and in no way should appearance be associated with your relationship, all the power to you man. I realise ive been an asshole, and im in no way out to hurt anyone. Just being my immature self, please excuse me. |
Quote:
|
beer:
|
Quote:
now lets all just circle jerk....last one to blow eats the biscuit |
Quote:
LMAO!! |
Gay, I thought I made up roflsaurus....
|
Quote:
such that only five minutes describing their logic is necessary for everyone to take them and have the same potential for success. The Wonderlic, in case I wasn't already clear enough, is a bad example of a good IQ test, although it has excellent norming due to the fact that millions of people worldwide have taken a shot at it. There's a reason we have to test a large sample of the general population in order to have accurate norms: otherwise, we would have problems identifying anyone stuck on the far right of the bell curve. I'm sorry you didn't know this, but it's all out there. Last bit: did you know they design tests for different areas to avoid this "culture-loaded" problem ? I guess not. If you were referring to online tests, I'm sorry I took the time to reply... (Edit) PS. I apologize if I come off as being an ass: I'm tired of people bashing something they hardly know about. The problem comes from a special little site called Tickle/Emode, more usually mentioned than other places. I took the time to read many of the APA articles, on top of having a few discussions with shrinks and psychometricians, so I know about it. No one would argue that a ruler measures distance (and height) because we can clearly see how short or tall someone is. However, since intellect is often concealed unless looked for, it's easier for people to misunderstand how IQ testing works, even though the methods that were used to arrive at an estimate are tried and true. |
Seriously you guys talking bout nyck's wife is just fucking low. Make fun of him and his nascar., leave his wife out you dolts.
+ Smart people see threw the Bull shit we call republicans. |
Quote:
EDIT: +1... |
Im sorry. Nyck has no right to know anything about what people say about his wife. Im sure he would rather them keep saying it, you know spread the hate so it gets around. ENCOURAGE HATE LOL who is next the jews?
|
offtopic: offtopic: offtopic:
|
Quote:
nyck would see them, but where you knew his wife would see them too. eek: Although it is funny to see you try to dress it up as good deed, it remains a pathetic, small-minded act. |
[quote="Eight Ace":b48c8]
Quote:
nyck would see them, but where you knew his wife would see them too. eek: Although it is funny to see you try to dress it up as good deed, it remains a pathetic, small-minded act.[/quote:b48c8] You act like I did it so Id hurt them. Maybe i went about it the wrong way, but my intentionw as not to hurt them. If I did, well then im sorry. |
Quote:
"hey, I have a 160 IQ!": what do they mean by 160 ? Are they referring to a 15 or 24 point standard deviation ? If the former, they would be considered exceptionally gifted, whereas on a 24 deviation, slightly above the gifted level. If an online test gives you a result that doesn't include a percentile range, run. Even if it did, online norming (or author extrapolation) invalidates the test from the start. I only know of two, maybe three valid online tests... and even they suffer from slightly inaccurate norming. Whatever your score online, it's good to multiply by .95 to be sure of your result... beer: |
IQ tests are bullshit.
Google search: Multiple Intelligences. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.