Something is wrong.........

Oh yeah my post vanished as well and appeared like 3 days later. Whats up with that?

Something is wrong.........

Oh yeah my post vanished as well and appeared like 3 days later. Whats up with that?

Israel also took part in the Eurovision Song Contest.

I'll play along with this farfetched hypothetical situation. First off, when has all of Europe ever been able to ban together for any war. as a matter of fact WWI, WWII, and a majority of previous wars are inter European skirmishes that have managed to drag the rest of the world into it. In contridition, when the USA has been attacked or threatened, the people ralley together. Not naming any specific countries, but some of them owe their freedom they have today( including criticizing the USA) to the USA. If the USA attacked Europe, I highly doubt that all European countries would form a unified front, That being said, the US would incur too many casualties and probably withdraw in concession ( aka vietnam). If Europe attacked the USA, very high casualties(both sides) but Europe would definitely lose. Not only would Europe have to beat a strong military on its homeland, but the American people would unite and every guy with a shotgun would be in the battle. No one has ever defeated the USA on its homeland except the USA itself in the civil war

usa would win hands down

regardless, at that time of the byzantine, russia was an outsider

u = oOo:

Were talking billions here against how many? Pfft sure.

this thread is the funneh

more like Eagles and Falcons vs. Eurofighter Baffoons,
Tomcats, Hornet and Harriers vs. Rafales and Harriers,
Ticos and Burkes vs Type 42s and froggy DDGs,
B-2s and B-52s vs...converted Concordes?? :biggrin
Nimitzes vs the Charles de Gaulle.

Btween the US Navy and Air Force the Europeans would have a tough time getting across "the pond", those that got ashore intact would get wiped out by our redneck militia patrols
evil:

god bless those crazy rednecks

[quote="Sgt Stryker":102ca]more like Eagles and Falcons vs. Eurofighter Baffoons,
Tomcats, Hornet and Harriers vs. Rafales and Harriers,
Ticos and Burkes vs Type 42s and froggy DDGs,
B-2s and B-52s vs...converted Concordes?? :biggrin
Nimitzes vs the Charles de Gaulle.

Btween the US Navy and Air Force the Europeans would have a tough time getting across "the pond", those that got ashore intact would get wiped out by our redneck militia patrols
evil:[/quote:102ca]


Well that was an interesting pile of bollocks. I see the oOo: is strong with you.

[quote="Sgt Stryker":c04d9]more like Eagles and Falcons vs. Eurofighter Baffoons,
Tomcats, Hornet and Harriers vs. Rafales and Harriers,
Ticos and Burkes vs Type 42s and froggy DDGs,
B-2s and B-52s vs...converted Concordes?? :biggrin
Nimitzes vs the Charles de Gaulle.

Btween the US Navy and Air Force the Europeans would have a tough time getting across "the pond", those that got ashore intact would get wiped out by our redneck militia patrols
evil:[/quote:c04d9]
lol good point man

I think not, the most important aspect of an inter-continental non-nuclear war is air and naval power.

Does Europe have a counter to the 100 nautical mile AIM-54 Phoenix missile? No plane, American or otherwise, can stand up to a Tomcat, they have a lock and a missile away before the other guy is even in range.
With a "world war" going on one would assume that jetliners stay grounded so Tomcats would be free to shoot first rather than closing to visual like in the small conflicts.

doh, that last one was a responsw to Gerard

america is a terrifying country