I was right
 

http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story. ... 0903LON104


this gist of it is: I was right and Iraq had no nukes or a real programme. Their nuke building plans were fucked before Gulf War I and it was the war that saved their asses (evidence of failure was destroyed) from being boiled in oil by Saddam.
The scientists routinely falsified reports abotu their "sucess"

Old News... Everyone knew that iraq did not have nukes, but everyone knew that iraq was trying to get there hands on some, so we went over there kicked there ass and soon we will have oil streaming happy:

[quote="[2ndS.S.]Enigma":d0201]Old News... Everyone knew that iraq did not have nukes, but everyone knew that iraq was trying to get there hands on some, so we went over there kicked there ass and soon we will have oil streaming happy:[/quote:d0201]

"kicked there ass" ???? UHHHHHH stupid:

[url="http://lunaville.org/wc/LunavilleAnalysis112703.htm"]http://lunaville.org/wc/LunavilleAnalysis112703.htm[/url]

So the fact that we occupy the country with only ineffective (large picture) gurillia attacks as the opposition; after yet again setting new records for speed in combat and lethality we have not been deamed as having kicked there ass? Im sorry but anytime you can invade, occupy and hold an entire country with less than 500 dead you have effectivly kicked the living shit out of your foe. Granted we still have time in country left, but frankly 500, or even 2000 dead is by compairison far less than any other conflict we have been in.

Besides webb, did you find any stats for Iraqi losses? I think the offset would be more than slightly in our favor.

we know he doesnt have nukes, but he had some chemicals. i dont know if they were weapon ready, but they were for warfare. he had mobile biological trucks and he prolly buried some weapons in the sand somewhere. i dont really care anyways, i still think he had to go. WMD was W's ecuse for going to war and now we look stupid because we cant find any. screw it, dictators need to go.

hahahaha Bush has no officaly labeled a fucking idoit

...speaking of fucking idiots, how are ya Kingwank...?,
still backstabbing aa.com over there at gg.net..? rolleyes:

...says the guy who typed "no" for "now", "officaly" for "officially", "idoit" for "idiot", and forgot the word "been" between "officaly" and "labeled".

Nice try, though.

ROFL

OWNT!

"Nice try, though." = Brilliant touch.

heh heh...danke. Well, it might encourage the young fella to do better next time. biggrin:

Today's youth... rolleyes:

You beat me to it. happy: Right when I saw that I was going to make a similar comment.

[quote="Eight Ace":48c00]...speaking of fucking idiots, how are ya Kingwank...?,
still backstabbing aa.com over there at gg.net..? rolleyes:[/quote:48c00]
lol..........

I know everyone hears it alot.....But, some peoples' spelling and grammar is fucking DISGUSTING. Most of it is the simple shit, too. Like, spelling basic words and putting comas, spaces and full-stops in the right places.

It makes it so much easier to read, and I honestly feel less respect for someone who has no grasp on the english language, when using the internet as a communication medium.
I mean, sure, you have content of post to make a first impression around, but if it's typed out at the level of a fucking 7 year old, then I'm going to think that this is all this person is capable of.

...2 Cents on the issue. beer:

Right on Tripper.