BF 1942: r0x0rs or sux0rs?
 

Is BF 1942 an awesome game, or does it suck monkey balls?

Make a decision as to wheteher you like this game or don't.

Wheres the Afrodj13 option?

I would have added an in between. I like the game but has a lot of issues right now. Once they get the patches out and fix the net code. It will be a very good game.

PS- I still think MOH is much better IMO

Thats the point. I don't want an inbetween. I want an affirmative decision on whether this game rules or sucks.

[img]http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gerald.marley/Smilies/repost3.gif[/img] for making this post. This is a medal of honor fansite wtf do you think people are gonna vote for? You may as well go to the uber gay day of defeat site and ask them if medal of honor is any good, 99% of them will say it sucks just because of their blind loyalty to their dinky little mod.

what exactly is a roxor and suxor? (whatever, spelling)

Holy shit. read Gerald.

This has nothing to do with MOH.

People are allowed to like more than one game you know. People can like BF and MOH at the same time.

I simply asked if BF was good or not. It has no relation to MOH.

Get it?

he's just trying to make himself feel superior.... it's his inferiority complex at work.

blind loyalty? how many people actually still play mohaa here? not a whole lot.

yeah sure, you don't know how many people play moh here, afaik its the third most played game on the net behind bf-1942 and half lifes mad selection of mods. For all we know 3/4 of the people that come here still play moh online.

And i still stand by my initial statement, if somewhere like gamespot or gamespy made a poll like this there would be some point to it but on a medal of honor fansite? cmon.

It doesn't matter, gerald.

Just answer the fuckin question.

i just got it today, seems fun, i hope biggrin: cant wait to dive into the action, im opening the box right now freak:

I already did vote in the "poll".

And my names GERARD


hake:

Good Gerald.

You're learning fast my son.

whos Geraldo? I like BF1942 a lot. However, its a totally different beast than MOH.

Well, i said it Sucks, there are just too many issues with it right now and MOHAA rules - even more so when the expansion pack arrives, well, i hope anyway.

As to what Gerard was saying, i would have to agree, this is a Medal Of Honor fan-site and you will find if people have dedicated their time to post on the forum, then they will generally think the game Rocks! Unless they want to diss it, but they will not stay here for very long!

In saying that, the poll at the moment is proving me wrong :P.

You guys are not getting the oint.

Do not realte this poll to MOH in any way. MOH has nothing to do with this.

The question simply is: IS BF1942 a good game or not?

You can't really say that MoH fans will be biased since he's asking if BF is a good game, not which is better? MoH or BF oOo: It's not a hard concept to grasp :/

Well it is 6:28am here, so trying to think is like a very big effort at the moment heheh.

Now that you say the poll is not asking which is better, i see your point! BF has potential to be a good game, but like i said before, too many issues - especially multi-player.

BF multiplayer is great. I'm sure it will get better. The single player absolutely sucks. I hope that answers your question.

BF multiplayer is boring.

once i shot a guy 10 times from 3 feet away and he was still standing .

God - More of this shit.

Battlefield and MOH are two different games. Dont compare them. They arent the same in any respect except they are both set in WW2.

That being said, if you have a machine that can handle it, Battlefield is a great game.

Right now, I have a AMD Athlon XP1600, GeForce4 4200 Ti, 640megs of Sdram, and a Broadband connection. The game runs fine for me. Anyone with a system that MAY have run MOH, will not neccesarily run Battlefield, which is where we got alot of the animosity since folks are expecting something along the lines of MOH. You wont get it.

Bottom line for me, if you have a good system, that can handle the frames, the loadtimes, and online play - you will enjoy this game. It is large in scope and very ambitious. I would think it lays somewhere in between MOH and WW2Online as far as gameplay is concerned - the maps are huge, and are not centrated with "physical eye acndy" (that is NOT to say that the game is boring looking, the graphics look great in my honest opinion) - they are very open and you will need to use some form of transport usually to get to the enemy. That is the draw of this game for, me, hopping in a WESPE, laying down some artillery fire - sliding in next to someone in a jeep, rushing to the other side of the map, and engaging in hand to hand with the enemy at their base. Unlike MOH, there are SEVERAL directions where you WILL be attacked by the enemy, so just spawning in a spae will not garuantee you are actually free from enemy fire.

Bottom line, the game is a bitch on system resources taking up nearly 220 megs of available ram, but if you can crank the settings up with your card DEFINATELY got this game.

And yes, the netcode needs work. You can shoot someone and they not go down. Just something they are working on for release in the next patch. Definitely look at some game reviews for this game and some screenshots and vids to see the potential this game has for enjoyment.

Trust me, on a 52-64 man Battle of The Bulge, Berlin, Stalingrad, Market Garden, or Bocage - you will defintely see why there are a good number of people playing this game.