![]()  | 
	
		
 flying dukw 
		
		
		[img]http://www.foils.org/gallery/flyingd.jpg[/img] 
	 | 
		
 wish i could have theedit button so i could have checked off attach signature 
	 | 
		
 whats a dukwjiefjhwf ir!? 
	 | 
		
 it was an amphibious troop transport, here's another one, but it is russian 
	[img]http://www.battlefield.ru/library/bookshelf/aerosani/rf8_03.jpg[/img]  | 
		
 Heh! - Fucked up.... 
	 | 
		
 Those remind me of those ski-doo para glider machinegun things in that James Bond movie. 
	 | 
		
 [quote="Old Reliable":32b6c]it was an amphibious troop transport, here's another one, but it is russian 
	[img]http://www.battlefield.ru/library/bookshelf/aerosani/rf8_03.jpg[/img][/quote:32b6c] everglades air-boat thingy Russian style biggrin:  | 
		
 yes it was called the Aerosan, could reach speeds up to 60mph 
	 | 
		
 LCACs pwn those things up  hake: ..... biggrin: 
	 | 
		
 english, not retarded please 
	 | 
		
 [quote="Old Reliable":a4f78]english, not retarded please[/quote:a4f78] 
	Ok mr. "i'm to stupid to make sense out of that" The LCAC (Landing craft air cushion) is a much better vehicle than that. btw why the hell did you post that anyway?  | 
		
 [img]http://www.combatindex.com/hardware/images/sea/lcac/lcac45_02.jpg[/img] 
	LCACs are nice  | 
		
 ok i dont really give a shit about lcac, nevermind this post if you dont really care to learn about it.....DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 
	 | 
		
 well i wanna learn, tell me who used them? how long were they in service? who the fuck invented them?  eek: 
	 | 
		
 i dunno....i only found a picture oOo: 
	 | 
		
 i saw a show about dukws,  not very intresting cause the dukws so ugly 
	 | 
		
 [quote="Old Reliable":4a9b6]ok i dont really give a shit about lcac, nevermind this post if you dont really care to learn about it.....DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH[/quote:4a9b6] 
	Fucking Child.  | 
		
 and you have something constructive? 
	 | 
		
 fire2:             M16: 
	 | 
		
 anyone here ever touch a old man's wee-wee? 
	 | 
		
 [quote="Old Reliable":70fd5]and you have something constructive?[/quote:70fd5] 
	Yeah.....*/me shits in a sock* It may not be constructive, but it's certainly competition against your childish ramblings.  | 
		
 why do you even post in my thread, it is obvious you just come here to continue your internet arguments with people and not post anything worthwhile hake: and no germ i dont think anyone wants to touch a wee wee 
	 | 
		
 [quote="Old Reliable":0b706]why do you even post in my thread, it is obvious you just come here to continue your internet arguments with people and not post anything worthwhile  and no germ i dont think anyone wants to touch a wee wee 
	[/quote:0b706] Are you gonna cry, Sweetie?  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 [quote="Capt. John Miller":9f5b0]LCACs pwn those things up  hake: ..... biggrin:[/quote:9f5b0] 
	well duh the LCAC is only like 40 years more advanced than those WWII vehicles. Are you gonna say next that an F-16 will own a ME-109? apples and oranges my firend, apples and oranges  | 
		
 "firend"....DOH! Stryker can't spell 
	 | 
		
 i dont think americans have too many of the L things .. i think one was in that jackie chan movie rumble in the bronx?..that thing pwned cars and shit 
	 | 
		
 rumble in the bronx was made about present day, slap nuts  biggrin: 
	 | 
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:31 AM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
	
	© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions  | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.