Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   On the topic of Incest. (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=25718)

SoLiDUS 05-28-2003 07:54 PM

On the topic of Incest.
 
I will refrain from revealing my position for the moment, but let's hear it
folks: do you think incestuous behavior is wrong ? Support your position
with an argument please.

Gonzo 05-28-2003 07:56 PM

i think that is nasty to have bang some one in your family

Totenkopf 05-28-2003 07:58 PM

Hmmmm....my cousin is pretty hot. ed:

Stinger_Dude 05-28-2003 07:59 PM

Re: On the topic of Incest.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SoLiDUS
I will refrain from revealing my position for the moment, but let's hear it
folks: do you think incestuous behavior is wrong ? Support your position
with an argument please.

Its ok you can tell us..... happy:

Unknown_Sniper 05-28-2003 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Totenkopf
Hmmmm....my cousin is pretty hot. ed:

I have some hot cousins too. I would neer have sex with them though. and right now I have ot read The Color Purple for english. lots of incest in there and its discusting

Innoxx 05-28-2003 08:01 PM

If people want to marry their cousins and whatnot that's their choice. Besides, incest has been here for centuries. It's not gonna go away becuase people find it morally wrong. So I guess my stance on this subject is indifferent.

Art Attack 05-28-2003 08:07 PM

I have some pretty hot cousins too, but I wouln't do anything with them, and I agree with Innoxx.

Stinger_Dude 05-28-2003 08:07 PM

I know lots of people find their cousins hot and even some fantasize having sex with them but I think thats far as it will go for most of them.
Having sex with a family relative is not just morally wrong it would be bioligically not good.

Old Reliable 05-28-2003 08:11 PM

[quote="Stinger_Dude":1bab5]I know lots of people find their cousins hot and even some fantasize having sex with them but I think thats far as it will go for most of them.
Having sex with a family relative is not just morally wrong it would be bioligically not good.[/quote:1bab5]

how so? I myself would not, as I do not find my cousins the least bit attractive. I am more into finding different people and learning about them instead of someone in my own family oOo:

Chronic Diarrhea 05-28-2003 08:13 PM

Hell of course its wrong!! But then again I think homosexual activity is wrong and perverse as well, but many say its just a lifestyle.

Stinger_Dude 05-28-2003 08:17 PM

Redneck Gay incest.

Sergeant_Scrotum 05-28-2003 08:32 PM

http://site.voila.fr/sscrotum/028.mp3

05-28-2003 08:39 PM

well for one thing it's really bad in terms of genetics, why do you think all teh royal families were fucked up, since they could only marry other royals the same blood kept going around between Russia, Germany, England, Austria, etc.

Simo Häyhä 05-28-2003 08:40 PM

solidus spawned from incest oOo:

JBird 05-28-2003 08:41 PM

"my daddy says im the best french kisser" oOo:

05-28-2003 08:44 PM

tasty.

Slinky2397 05-28-2003 09:16 PM

I think it's pretty sick. I mean, it's family..Gee. Well, Edgar Allen Poe married his 13 year-old cousin, that's just freaky. My cousin is hot, but jumpin on a shag pad, hell no.

CaP bUsTa 05-28-2003 09:16 PM

wow it seems like everyone on these forums has hot cousins
crazy

:Hybrid: 05-28-2003 09:21 PM

[quote="CaP bUsTa":a265f]wow it seems like everyone on these forums has hot cousins
crazy[/quote:a265f]
hah....not me



well maybe, but no banging hake:

Bazooka_Joe 05-28-2003 09:42 PM

Are you for real? Who cares if it's right or wrong, it's gross.

SoLiDUS 05-29-2003 01:03 AM

This post says it better than I ever could, so I submit it to your perusal:

Incest

Incest, though generally looked down upon for quite some time, can harldy be immoral. It may be true that animals avoid incest in nature, and some may infer that this means Incest is unnatural, but that can hardly mean that it is immoral. Such an argument was already tackled earlier. The appeals to beauty, obscurity, design, love/meaning, and religion also fail on grounds mentioned earlier. The most common objection raised against incest, though, is that it will produce offspring with defects, depriving them of a good chance to advance and excel in life decently and fairly. However, Incest can be defined as sexual relations between two family members. Having a child is another different area. With technology today, it is both possible to be have sex with a family member and not produce offspring, just as it is also possible to not have sex with a family member and still produce offspring. Sex and reproduction, though directly linked in some areas like biology, are not directly linked as far as actions go in the objective world. To avoid fertilization, and eventually debilitated offspring, one could always use provocatics or contraceptives, in their various and numerous forms. Another argument specifically pointed at incest is one that claims that the introduction of civilization is what ended incest. This can hardly be true, though, because even primates will avoid incest. But whether or not it is true is irrelevant. Because as religious icons started demoting incest, just about the same time that civilization started building up, this does not mean that civilized behavior is directly linked, or linked at all, to non-incestuous behavior.

[url:373ef]http://www.punkerslut.com/articles/modernsexual.html[/url:373ef]

Stinger_Dude 05-29-2003 01:09 AM

[quote="Old Reliable":9a83c][quote="Stinger_Dude":9a83c]I know lots of people find their cousins hot and even some fantasize having sex with them but I think thats far as it will go for most of them.
Having sex with a family relative is not just morally wrong it would be bioligically not good.[/quote:9a83c]

how so? I myself would not, as I do not find my cousins the least bit attractive. I am more into finding different people and learning about them instead of someone in my own family oOo:[/quote:9a83c]


You jsut pointed out almost the same thing as me. eek:

SoLiDUS 05-29-2003 03:59 AM

It is interesting how society and religion can distort your view of reality...

Harlen Maguire 05-29-2003 04:22 AM

Hmm, interesting Sloi...

So Incest is the process of having sex, not necessarily 'makin' babies'?

Well I suppose that alters my view, however, Incestual Rape is far worse than the regular kind...

SoLiDUS 05-29-2003 04:30 AM

Psychologically speaking, it can be.

Stinger_Dude 05-29-2003 04:32 AM

hey nice sig Von Paulas. What film did you get it from?

Stinger_Dude 05-29-2003 04:34 AM

Well incest except for rape all comes down to you. You wanna fuck your cousin/sister/brother/mother/father its your choice although you can get in trouble with the law.

Harlen Maguire 05-29-2003 04:39 AM

Psychologically speaking from which party?

Obviously someone who shows no regret for raping somebody, either in their family or not, wouldn't see a problem...

Stinger_Dude: This is a shot from the beach landing in the film "Snow Falling on Cedars", one of my faves. Good stuff, not a 'war' film though.

Eight Ace 05-29-2003 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoLiDUS
It is interesting how society and religion can distort your view of reality...

I think it's society and religion that have historically accommodated incest...
dominant families wanting to keep their power base within a controlled group.
...free to choose...the more natural* instinct (hot cousins aside) is to look further afield.



*apparently, after first being visually attracted to someone, it's the subtle smells that they give off
that start to work on you, and become part of the reason you think they're special...it must be love! happy:
but it's more than romance/lust....If a person is from a "strain" that has certain genetic strengths
and weakness'...their stink will be most attractive to someone with a differing genetic setup,
Bulk files can be swapped, is the mutual message.


Bottom Line: be it cousin or stranger...a bloke will get his "hole".

SoLiDUS 05-29-2003 06:04 AM

Hehe... yea, pheromones are funny little thingamajiggadoohickeys! happy:

pest 05-29-2003 07:19 AM

Sloi, heres where I disagree.

First - you(the arthor) had to lay conditions on incest to make it ok. Generally when you have to do something like that, its better off left alone. You had to narrow the scope of the word to mean sex only and not procreation. Winning on a technicality isnt really winning.

Second - We are talking morals, not science. Morals are defined by society and one west virginians twisted logic doesnt make it right. You made a comment about religion and society distorting your view of reality....where do you think morals for the majority of the country/world come from. Not science, and definately not from radical roach clip philosophers (sp?).

The guy is saying since no one is hurt, it isnt immoral. Does that mean slavery would be okay if the slaves were in better conditions than they had before? Domination and conquest are natural traits for man. Slavery is a natural progression of that. Does that make it ok?

Its kind of funny, when I read the post, I was reminded of Clinton asking "what is sex?/I didnt know oral sex was considered sex..."

Old Reliable 05-29-2003 12:13 PM

The idea of having incest as ok is quite disguisting, it would create that idea that you can have sex with anyone you want, no questions asked. good luck trying to convince one of your relatives to believe in incest, because that most likely wont happen.

con Brio 05-29-2003 12:24 PM

if u have sex with a family member or cousin, you increase the chances of repressed phenotypes to occur in the offspring. Those repressed phenotypes can sometimes be lethal. So dont do your cousins....'


.... i got a hot cousin i'd love to do oOo:

ED 05-29-2003 12:34 PM

Pest has already pointed out the things that I would have thought. Incest on a physical, scientific level certainly isn't a "wrong" - and correct me if I'm wrong but it certainly isn't illegal.

However, morally and socially it IS frowned upon. You "instinctively" know not to want to kiss or have sex with your siblings (and I'm not talking about 'exploring sexuality' as a child), it is a GUT feeling inside you that more than likely would be there had noone said anything regarding it.

And yea, it is just gross. I mean come on. If we're boiling it down to just sex, and physical act, then go jerk it. Sex and attraction ARENT what draw siblings together, or you to be drawn to a sibling. That's bs in my book. There's something ELSE there.

05-29-2003 03:40 PM

what the fuck is this shit now? man the de-evolution of man-kind appears to be proceeding unabated

BallisticWookie 05-30-2003 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pest
Sloi, heres where I disagree.

First - you(the arthor) had to lay conditions on incest to make it ok. Generally when you have to do something like that, its better off left alone. You had to narrow the scope of the word to mean sex only and not procreation. Winning on a technicality isnt really winning.

Second - We are talking morals, not science. Morals are defined by society and one west virginians twisted logic doesnt make it right. You made a comment about religion and society distorting your view of reality....where do you think morals for the majority of the country/world come from. Not science, and definately not from radical roach clip philosophers (sp?).

The guy is saying since no one is hurt, it isnt immoral. Does that mean slavery would be okay if the slaves were in better conditions than they had before? Domination and conquest are natural traits for man. Slavery is a natural progression of that. Does that make it ok?

Its kind of funny, when I read the post, I was reminded of Clinton asking "what is sex?/I didnt know oral sex was considered sex..."

Could'nt have said it better. Well done.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.