Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Nuclear War. (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=39723)

Short Hand 08-26-2004 11:52 PM

Nuclear War.
 
Im not trying to start any type of Flame War here, I just found it intresting to see how devestating these things are after they are used.

EDIT: Some extremely grotesque imagery. Proceed with caution.

http://www.ericblumrich.com/pl_lo.html

Coleman 08-26-2004 11:58 PM

I don't undertand why they put such a huge emphasis on babies. I mean, look at what alcohol and drugs do to a baby (pregnant mother). Yeah, it's a big deal, but they went in a wrong route there in my opinion.

Short Hand 08-27-2004 12:00 AM

well... you can't really take pictures of cancer.....And show it and expect it to be effective. I was more intrested in the facts this displayed other then the pictures. They just add more to the point this is trying to make i guess.

Ferich 08-27-2004 12:03 AM

gg shitty german music. I've known about depleted uranium for a LONGGGGGG time. Oh and by the way, half of those pictures have nothing to do with it.

p.s. you don't need radiation to have birth defects, in other words, some of those pictures have nothing to do with War or radiation.

Short Hand 08-27-2004 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferich
gg shitty german music. I've known about depleted uranium for a LONGGGGGG time.

saw that one coming from a mile away.

Coleman 08-27-2004 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferich
gg shitty german music. I've known about depleted uranium for a LONGGGGGG time.

bah, i eat uranium for breakfast!

Ferich 08-27-2004 12:05 AM

[quote="Short Hand":e2ddb]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferich
gg shitty german music. I've known about depleted uranium for a LONGGGGGG time.

saw that one coming from a mile away.[/quote:e2ddb]

So in other words, you're claiming I'm lying about knowing about depleted uranium?

Short Hand 08-27-2004 12:07 AM

[quote=Ferich]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":b00f3
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferich
gg shitty german music. I've known about depleted uranium for a LONGGGGGG time.

saw that one coming from a mile away.

So in other words, you're claiming I'm lying about knowing about depleted uranium?[/quote:b00f3]

No Ferich.. But I should have worded that better, I thought you would have taken it badly. I am preparing for the Flames here.

Ferich 08-27-2004 12:08 AM

[quote="Short Hand":2fee2][quote=Ferich]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":2fee2
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferich
gg shitty german music. I've known about depleted uranium for a LONGGGGGG time.

saw that one coming from a mile away.

So in other words, you're claiming I'm lying about knowing about depleted uranium?[/quote:2fee2]

No Ferich.. But I should have worded that better, I thought you would have taken it badly. I am preparing for the Flames here.[/quote:2fee2]

The only thing I have a problem with is that most of those pictures have jackshit to do with depleted uranium or nuclear war. Look like strange birth defects that happen with drugs, drinking bleach, whatever.

Short Hand 08-27-2004 12:11 AM

Well the Photographs were all From a single Photographer, just google his name and im sure all the back info on them can be attained. Thus telling what has caused this stuff to them.

Conscript 08-27-2004 12:13 AM

Hey fuckhead how about a NSFW warning or something.At least a dead mutilated baby warning..I was expecting something about japan and now im looking at fucked up babys?I thought people could get banned for that baby soup bullshit..this is just as bad if not worse..Please,stick a fucking warning in there! cuss:

Short Hand 08-27-2004 12:15 AM

umm.... They show this kind of stuff on TV,...... After seeing Tub Girl & That other shit edited into my posts so many times last night I guess I may be a little uneffected by this stuff.

Ferich 08-27-2004 12:19 AM

Takashi Morizumi is the fellow's name. I got confused since I saw his 1st Gulf War pictures a few years ago, then other ones during the 2nd. ANYWAYS, DU = War Crime. I've felt that way long before seeing this movie.

Conscript 08-27-2004 12:21 AM

[quote="Short Hand":8830d]umm.... They show this kind of stuff on TV,...... After seeing Tub Girl & That other shit edited into my posts so many times last night I guess I may be a little uneffected by this stuff.[/quote:8830d]I wasnt here for 2 days so i didnt see it and thus dont care..All i ask is a warning,please?[/offtopic]


I turned it off halfway through.Stupid german music&dead babys++.Can someone give me cliffs so i dont have to look at that crap?

NexusRevived 08-27-2004 12:23 AM

Re: Nuclear War.
 
[quote="Short Hand":a9b7c]Im not trying to start any type of Flame War here, I just found it intresting to see how devestating these things are after they are used.


[url="http://www.ericblumrich.com/pl_lo.html"]http://www.ericblumrich.com/pl_lo.html[/url][/quote:a9b7c]

shit, thats fucked.

hope i dont get uraniumed loney:

Blase 08-27-2004 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscript
Can someone give me cliffs so i dont have to look at that crap?

We've dropped 400 tonnes of Depeleted uranium

In 2003 in bagdad radation levels were 1000-1700 times higher

Cancer and Deformities have gone way up in bagdad since the first world war

67% of gulf war vets have deformed kids

Depleted Uranium has a half-life of over 4 billion years.

Conscript 08-27-2004 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blase
Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscript
Can someone give me cliffs so i dont have to look at that crap?

We've dropped 400 tonnes of Depeleted uranium

In 2003 in bagdad radation levels were 1000-1700 times higher

Cancer and Deformities have gone way up in bagdad since the first world war

67% of gulf war vets have deformed kids

Depleted Uranium has a half-life of over 4 billion years.

beer:

Short Hand 08-27-2004 01:59 AM

In yugoslovia cancer has risen 167 %

In iraq cancer has sky rocketed/ up to some estimates claim asm uch as 1900 %.... Fuck me....

strvs 08-27-2004 02:06 AM

[quote="Short Hand":51555]In yugoslovia cancer has risen 167 %

In iraq cancer has sky rocketed/ up to some estimates claim asm uch as 1900 %.... Fuck me....[/quote:51555]
Source?

Short Hand 08-27-2004 02:18 AM

the flash video. All the info is cited in their at the end of it. Mr STRVS.

Innoxx 08-27-2004 02:29 AM

[23:09] <Innoxx> http://www.ericblumrich.com/pl_lo.html
[23:09] <Innoxx> I wonder how true that is.
[23:13] <Da_Bian> delicious
[23:13] <STRVS> Holy mutated baby batman
[23:14] <STRVS> Itd be more beleivable if it didnt have that horrible music
[23:14] <Innoxx> and irrelvent material
[23:14] <Innoxx> nothing like getting deformed "cute things" to state your point
[23:15] <STRVS> Shock em into joining you.
[23:15] <STRVS> Works everytime
[23:15] <Innoxx> jup
[23:16] <Innoxx> Funny how they haven't provide any sources to back their claims either.
[23:16] <STRVS> We dont need facts, what we need is disgusting mutations
[23:17] <Innoxx> You know that in 2001, the sodomy rate among males between the ages of 16-25 has risen 30,000%? Mind you, this has everything to do with the production of Axe deordorant bodyspray.
[23:18] <STRVS> Cue picture of dead babie
[23:18] <STRVS> ITS TRUE!!!
[23:18] <Ferich> Whatever happened to a tommy gun and a few grenades?
[23:19] <Ferich> Let's shoot radiation at eachother.
[23:21] <Ferich> There's probably like 343432 Spidermen in Iraq
[23:21] <Ferich> Not really many buildings to shoot your web onto too...so they just ride camels with a web logo on the side.
[23:21] <Innoxx> lol

Short Hand 08-27-2004 03:12 AM

Inny...This was cited in the end of it...

http://www.cadu.org.uk/

Im guessing the facts were gathered from there. Yes.. The babies do add a shock value to it, making it more shocking to the viewer. But this is done all the time... If ya think about it.

http://www.ericblumrich.com

I also beleives he cites it in his site... Im not trying to start anything here..

Sgt&gt;Stackem 08-27-2004 07:44 AM

if its on the internet it must be true..................


propoganda bullshit, I refuse to believe those pictures are from the bombs that we recently dropped in the gulf. If you believe that crap, good luck in your life. Use your head for something other than a hatrack

Mr.Buttocks 08-27-2004 08:05 AM

Some DU related links if anyone wants to have a read....

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/133581_du04.html

http://www.sundayherald.com/40096

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993627

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f ... 233872.DTL

http://www.robert-fisk.com/depleted_uranium_links.htm

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/get ... 1122b3.htm

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/THO302A.html

imported_Fluffy_Bunny 08-27-2004 08:50 AM

[quote:d4ee5][T]he two contenders met, with all their troops, on the field of Camlan to negotiate. Both sides were fully armed and desperately suspicious that the other side was going to try some ruse or stratagem. The negotiations were going along smoothly until one of the knights was stung by an asp and drew his sword to kill the reptile. The others saw the sword being drawn and immediately fell upon each other. A tremendous slaughter ensued. The chronicle.., is quite specific about the point that the slaughter was excessive chiefly because the battle took place without preparations and premeditation. [/quote:d4ee5]

Herman Kahn, - Thermonuclear War

Merlin122 08-27-2004 09:09 AM

yes, depleted uranium is bad. we've known this for quite some time. Two of the pictures i've actually seen before (i forget where though), and they had nothing to do with the effectsof DU.

Zoner 08-27-2004 09:18 AM

Please stick disclaimers on this kind of stuff please. eek:

Madmartagen 08-27-2004 11:22 AM

[quote="Fluffy_Bunny":8f7c9][quote:8f7c9][T]he two contenders met, with all their troops, on the field of Camlan to negotiate. Both sides were fully armed and desperately suspicious that the other side was going to try some ruse or stratagem. The negotiations were going along smoothly until one of the knights was stung by an asp and drew his sword to kill the reptile. The others saw the sword being drawn and immediately fell upon each other. A tremendous slaughter ensued. The chronicle.., is quite specific about the point that the slaughter was excessive chiefly because the battle took place without preparations and premeditation. [/quote:8f7c9]

Herman Kahn, - Thermonuclear War[/quote:8f7c9]
Isnt that about King Arthur???

bukdez 08-27-2004 12:05 PM

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":4cece]if its on the internet it must be true..................


propoganda bullshit, I refuse to believe those pictures are from the bombs that we recently dropped in the gulf. If you believe that crap, good luck in your life. Use your head for something other than a hatrack[/quote:4cece]


i hear what you are saying... BUT... look at photos from the devestation of Hiroshima, and those photos, you will see a direct relationship in the types of defects caused by radiation...

it is a very propagandic/in-your-face video, but the fact remains that war is horrible and gory...

ninty 08-27-2004 06:30 PM

We shouldn't be analyzing the photos...those are just done for effect.

What we should focus on are the stats. And if their true, then there may be a point to a video.

Short Hand 08-27-2004 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9
We shouldn't be analyzing the photos...those are just done for effect.

What we should focus on are the stats. And if their true, then there may be a point to a video.

thats what i wanted people to take into effect.. yet 90 % has failed to do so..

Drew 08-27-2004 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9
We shouldn't be analyzing the photos...those are just done for effect.

What we should focus on are the stats. And if their true, then there may be a point to a video.

First of all, about half of those are taken from a VERY old (1970s, IIRC) advanced anatomy textbook. A buddy of mine used the textbook as a reference for his biology analysis paper on the effects alcohol and drug abuse have on a fetus.

That being said, I can pretty much guarantee you that none of those pictures are even scarcely related to the depleted uranium left behind from ammunition. In fact, the residue left from this type of ammunition is so slight that a stock Geiger counter won't even register it above the natural radiation levels created by sunlight, etc.

Your computer, cell phone, laptop, PDA, cordless telephone, television [et al] generate more radiation than a depleted uranium round.

This is just an example of a bored 14-year old with half the facts or some dumbshit, hippy freshman science teacher who decided to make a "cool" flash video regarding something about which he is utterly fucking clueless.

Source of my information is the three hour debate I was required to participate in for my Politics 211 course, so I apologize that I don't have links. If anyone feels like looking all this up, feel free to link it.

ninty 08-27-2004 08:23 PM

That's why I said ignore the pictures. oOo:

Short Hand 08-27-2004 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9
That's why I said ignore the pictures. oOo:

lol.

Drew 08-27-2004 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9
That's why I said ignore the pictures. oOo:

I caught that, which is why I also discounted whatever source he used to gather his information on the effects of depleted uranium ammunition. About the only fact in his cute little presentation was the half-life of depleted uranium.

Some information on why DU ammunition isn't harmful:

[quote:25b78]
An alpha particle consists of two protons and two neutrons and is positively charged (+2). Most alpha particles are not energetic enough to penetrate skin and are not considered an external hazard.[/quote:25b78]

[quote:25b78]
238U—which by weight makes up almost 99.8 percent of DU—is an alpha emitter. The radiological half-life of 238U or the time required for 238U to lose 50 percent of its activity by decay is 4.5 x 109 years. 238U decays into two short-lived "daughters:" thorium-234 (234Th, half-life of 24.1 days) and protactinium-234m (234mPa, half-life of 1.17 minutes)—which are beta and gamma emitters. Because of this constant nuclear decay process, very small amounts of these "daughters" are always present in DU. 235U (half-life of 7.0 x 108 years) decays into thorium-231 (231Th, half-life 25.5 hours), which decays into protactinium-231 (231Pa, half-life of 3.25 x 104 years) and then to actinium with a half-life of 21.8 years, resulting in alpha and beta particles and gamma rays.[196] The 238U and 235U chains continue through a series of isotopes before terminating in stable, non-radioactive lead isotopes 206Pb and 207-Pb, respectively.[/quote:25b78]

[quote:25b78]
"Depleted uranium," the byproduct of the enrichment process, has about 0.002 percent 234U, 0.2 percent 235U and 99.8 percent 238U, and about 60 percent of natural uranium’s radioactivity. In the gaseous diffusion process, uranium hexafluoride (UF6), a gaseous compound of uranium and fluorine, is separated into two fractions—one enriched in 235U and one depleted in 235U. The depleted fraction is then chemically transformed into a uranium metal stock. This is the first stage at which the depleted material is in the state necessary for further processing by ammunition manufacturers.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) defines "depleted uranium" as uranium in which the percentage of the 235U isotope’s weight is less than 0.711 percent. Military specifications mandated by the Department of Defense (DoD) require that the percentage of 235U be less than 0.3 percent, but in actual practice, DoD uses DU with a 235U content of approximately 0.2 percent.[197] DU is 40 percent less radioactive than the uranium in the raw uranium-bearing ores found in nature; but its material content is still uranium. The specific activity of DU is, therefore, about 0.4 µCi/g. All isotopes of uranium are essentially identical chemically and, since depleted and natural uranium are just different mixtures of the same three isotopes, they have the same chemical properties.

The Department of Energy has recently reported that the DU used by DOD in its armor plates (found only on "Heavy Armor" Abrams tank models) may contain trace levels of transuranics (neptunium, plutonium, and americium) and fission products (technetium-99). The DU used in munitions may also contain these materials. The military services are testing the stocks of DU munitions and parts. The levels of transuranics and fission products found during testing of the material used for producing armor packages are in minute quantities (the picocurie/gram range) and result in less than a one percent increase in the internal radiation dose. These evaluations indicate that measures designed to protect personnel from the DU itself are adequate to protect them from the traces of transuranics and fission products as well.[/quote:25b78]

Conscript 08-27-2004 09:17 PM

So wtf was the point in short showing us this oOo:

Drew 08-27-2004 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscript
So wtf was the point in short showing us this oOo:

He just didn't know any better. Not his fault, really. He just didn't take any time to research or form his own opinion on it and allowed it to do as intended - influence his opinion on such things.

Maplegyver 08-27-2004 09:18 PM

^ he is the side affect of depleated uranium

S1N1ST3R 3.0 08-27-2004 10:23 PM

[quote="Mr. maple":a154d]^ he is the side affect of depleated uranium[/quote:a154d]

Mustard Man 08-27-2004 10:25 PM

America sucks.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.