i've never really played DOD but i hear people going on about it a abit. does it challenge MOH in any way?

DoD is okay but since its just a mod to CS its nowhere as good as MOH

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by retrac2w:
DoD is okay but since its just a mod to CS its nowhere as good as MOH<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
uhmm its a mod(more of a total conversion) to half life.

MoH is using the q3 engine, doesnt that make it "just a quake3 mod"?

no the dod mod has glitches that freeze comp sometimes and messes up stuff

Heh, Madrebel I assume you are being sarcastic about MoH being a q3 mod 'cos it uses the Q3 engine.

That'd be like saying Half-Life was a Quake mod 'cos it used the Quake engine...

http://www.alliedassault.com/ubb/tongue.gif


------------------
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ydiss.s...ane/MoHsig.jpg

Give it a rest with the DOD bit. DOD SUCKS

There is nothing wrong with DoD. It has never once messed anything up on my system or crashed.

Half Life on the Quake engine huh. Well it started out on Quake but it pretty much became its own because it was modified almost entirely. So it is pretty much the Half Life Engine now. Anyway Mohaa and DoD are both great games. So play them both!!

------------------
http://pages-by-kathy.com/chad/buybonds23.jpg
http://mohaaplatoon.tripod.com

=[SE]= Sgt. WillyWonka
2nd Platoon, 3rd Squad Leader

[This message has been edited by [SE]Sgt.WillyWonka (edited February 11, 2002).]

In regards to the question at issue:

Day of Defeat gives Medal of Honor a run for its money if what you want is a more realism-based, objective-orientated, team-centric multiplayer game set in a World War II environment. And this assumes graphics are not an issue for you.

Medal of Honor, on the other hand, is more action-orientated, does less to promote team-based play, and is less objective-focused. It also has graphics that will knock your socks off.

So again, it depends on what you are looking for.

Day of Defeat is a total conversion of Half-Life, in much the same way Counterstrike and Team Fortress Classic are. That being the case, the graphics are dated by today's standards. That doesn't mean it looks bad; not by any means. DoD's Normandy level looks nice enough, and there are a few wrecked town and village levels that look great. None, however, hold a candle to MoH when it comes to pure eye-candy.

Day of Defeat uses a more realistic combat system and damage more accurately reflects real life. There are no health packs. A short burst from an automatic weapon can kill you fast. And so on.

Medal of Honor, meanwhile, is less realistic and more arcade-like in its combat system. It makes for a faster pace and a quicker game; less thoughtful, less planning, more crazed charges. (No respawns on some maps help counter that, however)

Day of Defeat does more to promote team gaming in several ways. One, of course, is that the whole point is team combat. It's all objective-based scenarios, and the game utilizes a brilliant respawn system that always respawns the dead in groups.

Medal of Honor does less to promote team-based gameplay. Hell, most of its maps are straight deathmatch maps. The game tracks very little as far as the team goes, focusing on kills instead. Several threads here have discussed this.

All in all, Day of Defeat is a very, very worthy game that Medal of Honor fans craving realism should, at the very least, check out. I like Medal of Honor's look and feel and mechanics a lot more, but I adore DoD's team-based play and great objective-orientated boards.

But remember, Day of Defeat is not yet a commercial product; it was made by the mod community. Medal of Honor may yet get its own version. (We can hope)

This shouldn't even be a question. What is wrong with you? I downloaded DOD. I play it say NEVER! Just play MOHAA and be happy with what you got.

------------------
http://slangerus.homestead.com/files/Waffen_SS_Flag.jpg
http://slangerus.homestead.com/files...ich_Symbol.jpg
-Waffen SS-

LOL.....
How does DOD even come close to Mohaa????
It doesn't have singleplayer....
It is a MOD....
DOD graphics are a lot worse than MOHAA graphics....
The water is realistic, not solid green....
You want more????

------------------
http://www.yoursighost.com/users/BMillis/sig1.jpg
We are now recruiting at http://bmillis.tripod.com Or contact me at bmillis0@home.com

Let's see, BMillis, what we can say here:

"It doesn't have singleplayer..."

Okay, fine. Deal with it from a multiplayer point of view. Most *know* Day of Defeat is a multipplayer game

"It is a MOD"

And your point is? There are loads of wonderful games that began as mods. One could argue easily enough that games using another game's engine are little more than total conversions. Why is Day of Defeat's MOD status a bad thing? And will that change when it is on store shelves as a commercial product (as it will be)?

"DOD graphics are a lot worse than MOHAA graphics"

Really and truly, YAWN. I like great graphics, I pay attention to great graphics, but in the end graphics mean exactly _squat_ compared to great gameplay. I'd rather play a game that plays well and is entertaining than a game that looks stunning but lacks substance any day. None of this, mind you, means Medal of Honor is a good-looking game without subtance ... for you folks ready to jump, I am talking in the general, not about MoH.

"The water is realistic, not solid green"

Yeah, nice, but that's the same as your last point. It's a graphics issue. And graphics do not mean a damn thing in the face of a good game.

"You want more????"

Yes. But not more question marks, because they are a sign of near illiteracy.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Shoegaze99:
In regards to the question at issue:

Day of Defeat gives Medal of Honor a run for its money if what you want is a more realism-based, objective-orientated, team-centric multiplayer game set in a World War II environment. And this assumes graphics are not an issue for you.

Medal of Honor, on the other hand, is more action-orientated, does less to promote team-based play, and is less objective-focused. It also has graphics that will knock your socks off.

So again, it depends on what you are looking for.

Day of Defeat is a total conversion of Half-Life, in much the same way Counterstrike and Team Fortress Classic are. That being the case, the graphics are dated by today's standards. That doesn't mean it looks bad; not by any means. DoD's Normandy level looks nice enough, and there are a few wrecked town and village levels that look great. None, however, hold a candle to MoH when it comes to pure eye-candy.

Day of Defeat uses a more realistic combat system and damage more accurately reflects real life. There are no health packs. A short burst from an automatic weapon can kill you fast. And so on.

Medal of Honor, meanwhile, is less realistic and more arcade-like in its combat system. It makes for a faster pace and a quicker game; less thoughtful, less planning, more crazed charges. (No respawns on some maps help counter that, however)

Day of Defeat does more to promote team gaming in several ways. One, of course, is that the whole point is team combat. It's all objective-based scenarios, and the game utilizes a brilliant respawn system that always respawns the dead in groups.

Medal of Honor does less to promote team-based gameplay. Hell, most of its maps are straight deathmatch maps. The game tracks very little as far as the team goes, focusing on kills instead. Several threads here have discussed this.

All in all, Day of Defeat is a very, very worthy game that Medal of Honor fans craving realism should, at the very least, check out. I like Medal of Honor's look and feel and mechanics a lot more, but I adore DoD's team-based play and great objective-orientated boards.

But remember, Day of Defeat is not yet a commercial product; it was made by the mod community. Medal of Honor may yet get its own version. (We can hope)<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

*claps hand*
Bravo, Bravo! http://www.alliedassault.com/ubb/smile.gif

I'll take Medal of HonorAA and Day of Defeat any day over Return to Castle Wolfenstein!

MoH ownz all...end of discussion http://www.alliedassault.com/ubb/smile.gif

hmm well by grafics mohaa kills DoD, but i think i have more fun playing DoD, probably cause of the mobile MGs. i have fun playing both though. But remember while both moh and dod are ww2 based they are not the same. Moh is arcade style warfare and dod is trying more on realism.

Comparing MoHAA to DoD in the MP aspect is quite simple really. DoD kills MoHAA.

------------------
http://ballisticwookieesstuff.freese...okiesigaa1.jpg http://ballisticwookieesstuff.freese...reedomsig1.jpg
Any Questions, Concerns or Comments ?
Email me at:Mindsnare18@hotmail.com
Remember to look at the FAQ and Developers Q and A before posting.
http://ballisticwookieesstuff.freese...s/watching.jpg
Do not attempt to adjust your set, this is a Streaming Freedom video bulletin, the cable hack will last exactly 60 seconds. It cannot be traced, it cannot be stopped, and it is the only free voice left in this city.

to the person who said graphics dont mean a thing, why dont they come out with a really good game play WW2 game and we'll all use stick figures, silly ass. i deleated DOD as fast as i could after one game. mohaa, better graphics better game play,more real

MOHAA is King, but DOD rules in gameplay. Simply, when they release the god-dam map editor, MOHAA fans can have the best of both worlds!!! Great graphics! Great gameplay!

Originally posted by BMillis

It doesn't have singleplayer....
thats why i own mohaa

It is a MOD....
whats your point?

DOD graphics are a lot worse than MOHAA graphics....
I prefer gameplay over graphics any day

The water is realistic, not solid green....
omg the water isnt realistic, what does that matter?!



------------------
http://xthirteen.homestead.com/files/141sig.jpg

zxcvnm: Half-Life is inexpensive these days and available not just in a cheap, basic version, but also in a variety of bundles pulling together expansion packs, Internet add-ons and other goodies. It is widely hailed as among the best, if not the best, shooter of all time and is worth the cash by any measure. It's a must-have.

raven6: If you think that graphics are the be-all and end-all of gaming, I can only imagine that you are a rather shallow gamer without a broad range of game experiences under your belt. I almost pity you for that.

Additionally, if you think Medal of Honor offers a more realistic style of gaming ... well ... sheesh. There really isn't much to be said about that. It's simply a silly statement to make that would not be uttered by anybody who has played both.

guys i need a ip

im not even gonna right anyhting. aww...umm well since i already started,
MOH 4 LIfe

------------------
[286th]_Mafiaman

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Shoegaze99:
zxcvnm: Half-Life is inexpensive these days and available not just in a cheap, basic version, but also in a variety of bundles pulling together expansion packs, Internet add-ons and other goodies. It is widely hailed as among the best, if not the best, shooter of all time and is worth the cash by any measure. It's a must-have.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

How much is it?

You may be able to find it in some stores a bit cheaper, but you can get the Game of the Year edition (with the *great* Team Fortress Class online add-on) for $30 at www.ebgames.com.

Half-Life: Counterstrike is also available as a standalone game for $30. That also includes TFC.

The Platinum Edition is rather expensive at $55, but it contains *everything* for Half-Life outside the Blue Shift expansion. The whole Opposing Force expansion, Counterstrike, Team Fortress, a bunch of other mods, plus the full original game.

If your connection is good, the Game of the Year edition is good for $30 (or you can find the original in some stores for $20-25), as both Counterstrike and Team Fortress are available as free downloads. If you've got the bandwidth, you can save some bucks by just downloading them ... and, of course, Day of Defeat. Also free.

DoD = Cool mod for HL. We are past that stage now, though. We are in the stage at which technoligy has advanced since HL, and newer, sharper, more realistic graphics have emerged. Prepare. . .for the era. . .of MOH:AA.

Dunno, man. I had 6 shots of Liquid Heroine, leave me alone!!

~ST_Bazooka_Joe
"There's nothing I like more then seeing a fine-ass nekkid woman holding a gun. . .and you're just all sorts of fine, now aren't ya?"

------------------
http://st.clanpages.com/Images/mysig2.jpg

i got the Platinum bundle which includes hl, CS, TFC, and OpFor, and a few extra mods, like firearms,redemption, wanted and others, it was 70 dollars, and that canadain dollars, so thats about $2 american :P

------------------
http://www.photoloft.com/view/export...1&w=273&h=302>

if you dont like the team play in moh, then join a clan, in clans, its more fun because its more team work..

------------------
http://dba.gamepoint.net/images/135428.jpg
http://community.theunderdogs.org/sm...ed/rlwhore.gif
This cat is a dangerous cat, no really.

I dont have Half-Life so cant have DOD...
*sigh*

ok, if you don't have halflife i think you can get if for like $10 now so i would get it. second the multiplayer of DoD is better than MoH regardless of graphics,

whoever was the dumb fuck that had to point out that DoD doesn't have a single player, bravo, i think you must have just passed kindergarden now huh?

I can't beleive some of you can be so shallow as to look ONLY at the graphics of a game and then compare it to another that does not have as nice textures.


EA has lotsa money and the staff to create a ripper game

DoD does not have piles of money but it does have dedicated staff who have imo create a very nice mod.

DoD will eventually feature SP but I think that would be a long way off.

------------------
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...8/fdf18c53.jpg
More negative waves Moriartii! Have a litte faith baby, have a little faith.

MOH is better