Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   RadeonX1900xtx (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=50465)

armed.zip 01-28-2006 12:54 AM

RadeonX1900xtx
 
i dunno if you guys now about this mofo but its like whoa

[url:8dd6f]http://www.ati.com/products/RadeonX1900/index.html[/url:8dd6f]

with a 600-650$ price and performance up the brown eye id say its the best fer now of course.

Simo Häyhä 01-28-2006 01:05 AM

how does this stand up to a 7800gtx?

Akuma 01-28-2006 01:21 AM

fastest card on the planet right there

but then again you can get a 7800gtx for $350.

Himmler 01-28-2006 02:09 PM

[img]http://www.ati.com/products/RadeonX1900/images/ToyShop_9.jpg[/img] ed: ed:

Short Hand 01-28-2006 02:19 PM

Will it outperform a 360 ?

elstatec 01-28-2006 02:26 PM

of course it will.

wintersforge 01-28-2006 02:39 PM

\\geRV$

Machette 01-28-2006 02:42 PM

Radeonx999999999999999999999 sleeping:

Akuma 01-28-2006 02:48 PM

[quote="Short Hand":1a4e3]Will it outperform a 360 ?[/quote:1a4e3]
not even close

WidowMaker555 01-28-2006 05:46 PM

my head is the best graphics card in the world

elstatec 01-28-2006 08:31 PM

[quote=Akuma]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":946b4
Will it outperform a 360 ?

not even close[/quote:946b4]


have you seen quake 4 run on a 360 oOo:

Forte 01-28-2006 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Himmler
[img]http://www.ati.com/products/RadeonX1900/images/ToyShop_9.jpg[/img] ed: ed:

only thing that looks nice in that are the water reflections.

01-28-2006 11:33 PM

overkill.

Akuma 01-29-2006 01:37 AM

[quote=elstatec]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akuma
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":32909
Will it outperform a 360 ?

not even close


have you seen quake 4 run on a 360 oOo:[/quote:32909]
Q4 looks like shit on PC too. oOo:

First gen games always looks like crap.

gtboys34 01-29-2006 03:21 AM

Is there any games out there on the pc that could even take an advantage of saaayy..80% of the cards performance? F.E.A.R I saw had some pretty hefty system requirements but nothing near graphics capability of the x1900

geRV 01-29-2006 07:22 AM

The x1900xtx is all about shader performance, games like fear run a lot better on this card than any other due to it having 48 pixel shaders, the x1800xt\7800gtx only have 16 pixel shaders.

If games continue to make heavy use of shaders then this is the card to go for. Im hoping to have my new system set up in the next month and one of these will definately be going into it.

geRV 01-29-2006 07:36 AM

[quote=Akuma]
Quote:

Originally Posted by elstatec
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akuma
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Short Hand":fe8dc
Will it outperform a 360 ?

not even close


have you seen quake 4 run on a 360 oOo:

Q4 looks like shit on PC too. oOo:

First gen games always looks like crap.[/quote:fe8dc]

hes not referrin to how it looks hes referring to how it runs, its a shitty port and has framerate problems all over the place. Dunno how you can say quake 4 looks like shit, looks a lot better than doom 3 and doom 3 was always in the spotlight because of its graphics being good.

Sniped Ur Azz 02-03-2006 06:11 PM

*cough* Awaits arrival of 7900GTx

geRV 02-03-2006 08:37 PM

[quote="Sniped Ur Azz":9985d]*cough* Awaits arrival of 7900GTx[/quote:9985d]

Which the r600 will take a shit on from a huge height...anyone seeing a pattern here. eek:

Jin-Roh 02-03-2006 09:16 PM

[quote=geRV]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Sniped Ur Azz":da5a2
*cough* Awaits arrival of 7900GTx

Which the r600 will take a shit on from a huge height...anyone seeing a pattern here. eek:[/quote:da5a2]

Thanks to GF1 I'm retarded and can't see patterns anymore. Reveal and explain this pattern.

geRV 02-03-2006 09:19 PM

eek:

Theres a performance leader for a couple of months with each new core\refresh before the other camp gets their new board out to take the crown for another short while.

02-03-2006 09:23 PM

sigh, all new cards are overkill. im satisfied with my x800 Pro.

c312 02-03-2006 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
eek:

Theres a performance leader for a couple of months with each new core\refresh before the other camp gets their new board out to take the crown for another short while.

which is why I hate the whole business surrounding graphics cards.

Short Hand 02-04-2006 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
sigh, all new cards are overkill. im satisfied with my x800 Pro.

Hell.. i am more then satisfied with my 9800 AiW Pro.

geRV 02-04-2006 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
sigh, all new cards are overkill. im satisfied with my x800 Pro.

Depends on he res and settings you play with, im a graphics whore so i love to bump up the res as high as i can and enable fsaa and anistropic filtering. 1680x1050 with everything maxed in a game like battlefield 2 use to cripple my x800xt.

1680x1050 in dod source with hdr on was the same deal, the card couldn't handle it, stangely enough though my 6800gt in this system seems to perform better in dod source, i can run at that res with fsaa+aniso+hdr enabled and get playable frame rates. eek:

Just comes down to res, at 1280x1024 x800's can handle most games, but games like fear at that res with fsaa and higher really need something faster to be properly playable.

geRV 02-04-2006 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
eek:

Theres a performance leader for a couple of months with each new core\refresh before the other camp gets their new board out to take the crown for another short while.

which is why I hate the whole business surrounding graphics cards.

Id like to see nvidia and ati only bring out 1 "family" of cards per year, it gets a bit ridiculous after a while having one card then 2 months later something fasters out for about the same price. Just no longevity in cards these days at all. annoy:

02-04-2006 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
sigh, all new cards are overkill. im satisfied with my x800 Pro.

Depends on he res and settings you play with, im a graphics whore so i love to bump up the res as high as i can and enable fsaa and anistropic filtering. 1680x1050 with everything maxed in a game like battlefield 2 use to cripple my x800xt.

1680x1050 in dod source with hdr on was the same deal, the card couldn't handle it, stangely enough though my 6800gt in this system seems to perform better in dod source, i can run at that res with fsaa+aniso+hdr enabled and get playable frame rates. eek:

Just comes down to res, at 1280x1024 x800's can handle most games, but games like fear at that res with fsaa and higher really need something faster to be properly playable.

I usually play at 1280*960 with AA 2x and AF 8x. Does the job.

Himmler 02-04-2006 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
sigh, all new cards are overkill. im satisfied with my x800 Pro.

Depends on he res and settings you play with, im a graphics whore so i love to bump up the res as high as i can and enable fsaa and anistropic filtering. 1680x1050 with everything maxed in a game like battlefield 2 use to cripple my x800xt.

1680x1050 in dod source with hdr on was the same deal, the card couldn't handle it, stangely enough though my 6800gt in this system seems to perform better in dod source, i can run at that res with fsaa+aniso+hdr enabled and get playable frame rates. eek:

Just comes down to res, at 1280x1024 x800's can handle most games, but games like fear at that res with fsaa and higher really need something faster to be properly playable.

I usually play at 1280*960 with AA 2x and AF 8x. Does the job.

but when you have a widescreen monitor as some people do, you dont play at that resolution. though there are smaller wide screen resolutions, they look like shit on monitors that need say a 1680x1050

c312 02-04-2006 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
eek:

Theres a performance leader for a couple of months with each new core\refresh before the other camp gets their new board out to take the crown for another short while.

which is why I hate the whole business surrounding graphics cards.

Id like to see nvidia and ati only bring out 1 "family" of cards per year, it gets a bit ridiculous after a while having one card then 2 months later something fasters out for about the same price. Just no longevity in cards these days at all. annoy:

I also don't like all the competition because I think it probably makes the prices higher. The cards are so expensive when they first come out, but then drop immediately when newer cards come out. If it weren't so competitive, it probably wouldn't cost as much for new cards.

geRV 02-04-2006 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
eek:

Theres a performance leader for a couple of months with each new core\refresh before the other camp gets their new board out to take the crown for another short while.

which is why I hate the whole business surrounding graphics cards.

Id like to see nvidia and ati only bring out 1 "family" of cards per year, it gets a bit ridiculous after a while having one card then 2 months later something fasters out for about the same price. Just no longevity in cards these days at all. annoy:

I also don't like all the competition because I think it probably makes the prices higher. The cards are so expensive when they first come out, but then drop immediately when newer cards come out. If it weren't so competitive, it probably wouldn't cost as much for new cards.

Nope, if graphics cards were based around one company then that company could charge whatever they liked for them since there would be no alternative, even innovation in features would get stale, they'd just throw in a new feature every couple of years instead of how it is now with new features appearing with every generation. The way things are with 2 companies now its more competative adding in new features and developing faster hardware.

If ati or nvidia goes ever goes under pc gaming is pretty much fucked because of the above pricing scenario.

c312 02-04-2006 09:32 PM

I never said anything about one company. I just think the competition between those companies is too intense. It's ridiculous how much they seem to want to out do the other.

02-04-2006 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
I never said anything about one company. I just think the competition between those companies is too intense. It's ridiculous how much they seem to want to out do the other.

They should be more like AMD and Intel...Dual Core just came out, so AMD is going to sell as much as possible before releasing their newest technological advance, the quad-core.

geRV 02-04-2006 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
I never said anything about one company. I just think the competition between those companies is too intense. It's ridiculous how much they seem to want to out do the other.

They should be more like AMD and Intel...Dual Core just came out, so AMD is going to sell as much as possible before releasing their newest technological advance, the quad-core.

Actually intels on track to release quad core first. ed:

02-04-2006 09:43 PM

whatever, the point is, they sell as much as they can of what they have now, then make a "breakthrough"...sounds like a logical marketing assault...unlike the dipshits who run ATi and nVidia.

Short Hand 02-05-2006 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
I never said anything about one company. I just think the competition between those companies is too intense. It's ridiculous how much they seem to want to out do the other.

They should be more like AMD and Intel...Dual Core just came out, so AMD is going to sell as much as possible before releasing their newest technological advance, the quad-core.

Actually intels on track to release quad core first. ed:

Intel has some major catching up to do... They are loosing there market strangle hold since companies like Dell, Hp, Gateway, etc will be or are carrying AMDprocessors now.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.