![]() |
RadeonX1900xtx
i dunno if you guys now about this mofo but its like whoa
[url:8dd6f]http://www.ati.com/products/RadeonX1900/index.html[/url:8dd6f] with a 600-650$ price and performance up the brown eye id say its the best fer now of course. |
how does this stand up to a 7800gtx?
|
fastest card on the planet right there
but then again you can get a 7800gtx for $350. |
[img]http://www.ati.com/products/RadeonX1900/images/ToyShop_9.jpg[/img] ed: ed:
|
Will it outperform a 360 ?
|
of course it will.
|
\\geRV$
|
Radeonx999999999999999999999 sleeping:
|
[quote="Short Hand":1a4e3]Will it outperform a 360 ?[/quote:1a4e3]
not even close |
my head is the best graphics card in the world
|
[quote=Akuma]
Quote:
have you seen quake 4 run on a 360 oOo: |
Quote:
|
overkill.
|
[quote=elstatec]
Quote:
have you seen quake 4 run on a 360 oOo:[/quote:32909] Q4 looks like shit on PC too. oOo: First gen games always looks like crap. |
Is there any games out there on the pc that could even take an advantage of saaayy..80% of the cards performance? F.E.A.R I saw had some pretty hefty system requirements but nothing near graphics capability of the x1900
|
The x1900xtx is all about shader performance, games like fear run a lot better on this card than any other due to it having 48 pixel shaders, the x1800xt\7800gtx only have 16 pixel shaders.
If games continue to make heavy use of shaders then this is the card to go for. Im hoping to have my new system set up in the next month and one of these will definately be going into it. |
[quote=Akuma]
Quote:
First gen games always looks like crap.[/quote:fe8dc] hes not referrin to how it looks hes referring to how it runs, its a shitty port and has framerate problems all over the place. Dunno how you can say quake 4 looks like shit, looks a lot better than doom 3 and doom 3 was always in the spotlight because of its graphics being good. |
*cough* Awaits arrival of 7900GTx
|
[quote="Sniped Ur Azz":9985d]*cough* Awaits arrival of 7900GTx[/quote:9985d]
Which the r600 will take a shit on from a huge height...anyone seeing a pattern here. eek: |
[quote=geRV]
Quote:
Thanks to GF1 I'm retarded and can't see patterns anymore. Reveal and explain this pattern. |
eek:
Theres a performance leader for a couple of months with each new core\refresh before the other camp gets their new board out to take the crown for another short while. |
sigh, all new cards are overkill. im satisfied with my x800 Pro.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1680x1050 in dod source with hdr on was the same deal, the card couldn't handle it, stangely enough though my 6800gt in this system seems to perform better in dod source, i can run at that res with fsaa+aniso+hdr enabled and get playable frame rates. eek: Just comes down to res, at 1280x1024 x800's can handle most games, but games like fear at that res with fsaa and higher really need something faster to be properly playable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If ati or nvidia goes ever goes under pc gaming is pretty much fucked because of the above pricing scenario. |
I never said anything about one company. I just think the competition between those companies is too intense. It's ridiculous how much they seem to want to out do the other.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
whatever, the point is, they sell as much as they can of what they have now, then make a "breakthrough"...sounds like a logical marketing assault...unlike the dipshits who run ATi and nVidia.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.