Clinton Vs Fox News
 

http://www.spikedhumor.com/articles/561 ... _News.html

Who wins well have a look.




surprised fox news even showed it.

it's been showed here all over the news in the states (and probably canada) for a week now. I think foxnews used it to show how Clinton got all pissed off and lost his temper. That's probably where they were going with that.

link posted @ 92 bengals to a commentary about the newcast afterwards as well, even better then the interview.

http://www.92bengals.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2857

where dude, can only find this one?

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/09/2 ... -american/

It's hard to see, it was hyper linked in harpo's edited post. (no underline to show it ect)

Fox News just comes off as slimey and schemeing....IMO, Clinton ftw.

They Reported Fooley as a Democrat today.. LOL fucking guys...

clinton was the coolest president ever. hes still a slick bastard now.













(at least he can speak articulately and reach a point clearly).

[quote="Short Hand":982e2]They Reported Fooley as a Democrat today.. LOL fucking guys...[/quote:982e2]

Fox did?

Fucking TYPICAL.

there is a difference between "at least he can speak articulately and reach a point clearly" and being the master of bullshitting, you get good at bullshitting when you lie all the time

Your kidding yourself if you don't think Bush has lied.

Clinton is portrayed as being some great liberal leader, but he wasn't. He wasn't great, and he wasn't liberal.

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":50c1d]
there is a difference between "at least he can speak articulately and reach a point clearly" and being the master of bullshitting, you get good at bullshitting when you lie all the time[/quote:50c1d]

i like being lied to in complete sentences with words that are actually in the english dictionary.

[quote=Judas]i like being lied to in complete sentences with words that are actually in the english dictionary.[/quote:64e46]



biggrin:

they all lie to some extent but Clinton brought disgrace to the Presidents Office. I dont care if you dont like the President but the position of President of the United States demands respect and to piss it away with blow jobs while heads of state are in the next room or the cigar BS is unforgivable. Its not a weekend in South Beach its the President of the United States

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":31032]
they all lie to some extent but Clinton brought disgrace to the Presidents Office. I dont care if you dont like the President but the position of President of the United States demands respect and to piss it away with blow jobs while heads of state are in the next room or the cigar BS is unforgivable. Its not a weekend in South Beach its the President of the United States[/quote:31032]

Yeah, but at least thousands of people didn't die because of Clintons "disgraces".

Unless you consider that since he didn't handle the problem during his administration that the price to handle it today was higher. If he had aggressively dealt with the problem after they tried to bomb the WTC the first time (and several other such events during his term) we wouldn't be where we are today. But he was having too much fun playing at being president to actually make the tough decisions that come with the office.

the toughest decision Clinton ever made was to marry that bitch Hillary

so how did Bush aggressively deal with the problem? Oh yeah, Iraq oOo:

... and Afghanistan ... and the thousands of known terrorists that have been rounded up worldwide. Still, he could have done more.

afganistan and Iraq were not for the war on terror or so the excuse would seem, they were for profit for alot of companies.

You are kidding right?

i believe some of those responsible for WTC attack in 93 were prosecuted and sent to prison - all in clintons term and fairly quickly.

as each day goes by I am more inclined to believe this

No.

Then you are grossly misinformed.