Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Politics, Current Events & History (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   haxed by North Korea (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=53368)

[DAS REICH] Blitz 10-08-2006 11:18 PM

haxed by North Korea
 
gg nkorea

[quote:e7084]SEOUL, South Korea (CNN) -- North Korea on Monday claimed it has performed a successful nuclear test, according to that country's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).

South Korean government officials also said North Korea performed its first nuclear test, the South's Yonhap news agency reported.[/quote:e7084]

[url:e7084]http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/10/08/korea.nuclear.test/index.html[/url:e7084]

Doctor Duffy 10-09-2006 12:25 AM

I just watched Team America other day, rofl, I couldnt stopl laughing at resemblence to king jong

Tripper 10-09-2006 04:16 AM

punishment for this shit will be more sanctions on north korea probably - id like to see how kim jong replies to that....

Unknown_Sniper 10-09-2006 08:29 AM

it doesnt change much in the world really. Other than N. Korea obviously having nukes. Kim wont be luanching and nukes at nearby neighbors and I highly doubt he will try to have someone smuggle one into the USA. The last thing hte world wants to do is start a fight over this.

Sgt>Stackem 10-09-2006 08:32 AM

I can the south being really pissed off. N Korea is just a bit smaller than Michigan. What about any kind of radiation or fall out? Im assuming it was an undergroung test but then what about the ground water. They could have really screwed up thier tiny, little spec of a nation for years to come

Unknown_Sniper 10-09-2006 10:06 AM

most of the reports that are out say that there was no radiation leakage. But who knows how true that actually is.

1080jibber 10-09-2006 10:08 AM

[quote="Unknown_Sniper":9ae32]it doesnt change much in the world really. Other than N. Korea obviously having nukes. Kim wont be luanching and nukes at nearby neighbors and I highly doubt he will try to have someone smuggle one into the USA. The last thing hte world wants to do is start a fight over this.[/quote:9ae32]they're biggest export is weapons, i wonder what they will do?

Poseidon 10-09-2006 10:57 AM

Why has the US got nukes yet they dont like it when everyone else has them (iraq, n korea etc)?

Unknown_Sniper 10-09-2006 11:01 AM

because we have over 30,000 of them and were not fucking crazy socialists or Jihaddists.
Also china, one of N. Koreas allies is pissed they have nukes now as well, so is France, England, Russia, Japan, and South Korea who cut off lots of aid shipments to the north.

KTOG 10-09-2006 11:24 AM

What about all the good benefits of nukes? Like blowing up a meteor the size of Texas or drilling to the center of the Earth to reactivate the core?

HAVENT WE LEARNED ANYTHING FROM HOLLYWOOD!

Vance 10-10-2006 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poseidon
Why has the US got nukes yet they dont like it when everyone else has them (iraq, n korea etc)?

lmao

Sgt>Stackem 10-10-2006 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poseidon
Why has the US got nukes yet they dont like it when everyone else has them (iraq, n korea etc)?


are you looking for an answer or just joking?

Colonel 10-10-2006 07:46 AM

[quote="Unknown_Sniper":87f98]it doesnt change much in the world really. Other than N. Korea obviously having nukes. Kim wont be luanching and nukes at nearby neighbors and I highly doubt he will try to have someone smuggle one into the USA....[/quote:87f98]

He doesn't need to smuggle it into the US, they are developing rockets that can carry them here. He got the technology from China. China got the technology from President Clinton in exchange for campaign contributions.

Poseidon 10-10-2006 09:55 AM

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":d9251]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Poseidon
Why has the US got nukes yet they dont like it when everyone else has them (iraq, n korea etc)?


are you looking for an answer or just joking?[/quote:d9251]

No answer required biggrin:

Mr.Buttocks 10-10-2006 10:23 AM

Good for them. I salute their indefatigability.

Sgt>Stackem 10-10-2006 12:34 PM

now they say they will fire off a nuke missle if the US doesnt talk to them, we really need these crack pots having nukes dont we. Id tell them to STFU and see if they FedEx a nuke to me. we all know there is now way possible for them to nuke the US. If I was Japan Id be worried.


What a bunch of asses. I hope the UN does something but Im willing to bet the lame assed UN will roll uver yet again and this mess will fall into the US's hands like all other international problems

ninty 10-10-2006 01:23 PM

Why doesn't the US do something? They seem eager to hype up Iran, yet Iran is said to be 10 years away from completing their program if they wanted to. now NK comes out and says it has one...well, it's it a bit of hypocracy to be going after Iran saying "you better not be making nukes or else" all the while NK is doing the exact same thing, and is probably a more serious cause because of the time frame?

Sgt>Stackem 10-10-2006 01:36 PM

the UN is supposed to handle crap like this. The US is sick and tired of being the worlds policemen. If the UN does nothing I hope we kick thier asses out of the US and withdraw from the UN, it is a useless peice of crap

ninty 10-10-2006 01:45 PM

I agree the UN is worthless. I would love to see Canada withdraw from it, but that would never happen, same for the US.

The point i'm making is that the US is picking which fights it wants to fight. It doesn't want to fight NK all the while it seems more than willing to challenge Iran on the issue, while NK would seem to be the more pressing issue.

Sgt>Stackem 10-10-2006 02:10 PM

the problrm with Nk is CHina

ninty 10-10-2006 03:26 PM

how so?

Sgt>Stackem 10-10-2006 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty
how so?



they are butt buddies, we dont want to piss off a billion chinamen

Eight Ace 10-10-2006 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty
The point i'm making is that the US is picking which fights it wants to fight.

..seems logical, do you fight the fights you want to fight?
...and when it does it's criticized non stop by people like yourself,
why would the US do the uns job for them...just so all its critics can
dump shit on it again?

ninty 10-10-2006 03:52 PM

oOo:

I can't make this any clearer. Why would the US go after Iran while NK is much farther along and a much more serious threat obviously if they have tested a nuclear weapon?

I only criticize them when they do moronic things like invade a country that has no nuclear weapons to stop them from using their non existant nuclear weapons.

If the US invaded Iraq to stop them from getting Nuclear weapons, and is threatening Iran to stop them from getting nuclear weapons, why aren't they threatening NK in the same way?

Before Iraq started, I said along with a ton of other people that NK and China seemed like a far bigger threat than Iraq. I believe that NK/China is still a far bigger threat than Iran is, howeevr their being handled in totally opposite ways.

Eight Ace 10-10-2006 04:05 PM

rolleyes: I'll try to make it simpler for you....why is the US the only country people
expect to do anything on the world stage, why doesn't the UN do their job?

is it Americas fault the UN are completely useless?.....how about Canada
forming a coalition and doing something about N.Korea...?

ninty 10-10-2006 04:25 PM

The Us is the only country that can do something. Even if a colition like NATO minus the US came into play, there is no way that it would be taken seriously without the help of the US.

Pyro 10-10-2006 04:54 PM

They still got a few detonations to go to catch up to the states

every country deserves a nuke...if one does.

Simo Häyhä 10-10-2006 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
They still got a few detonations to go to catch up to the states

every country deserves a nuke...if one does.

rolleyes:

Pyro 10-10-2006 05:12 PM

Ace...Canada can't possibly stop North Korea...i think Ninty is wondering why America chooses to take down countries who are not as big a threat as north korea

like if america can't striaght up invade them and beat them they don't...hitler should of had the realization and he would of won WWII.

TGB! 10-10-2006 08:00 PM

[quote:bf309]I can't make this any clearer. Why would the US go after Iran while NK is much farther along and a much more serious threat obviously if they have tested a nuclear weapon?[/quote:bf309]

Because NK doesnt have an entire region behind it ideologically and logistically. That's why. NK would have to contend with SK, CHINA, TAIWAN, etc. up their asses.

Nor does NK have fanatical elements that are able to move freely across its neighbors borders with this technology.

Foreign Policy isnt about satisfying millions of college kids in Poli-Sci classes, and trying to appear impartial. NK having a nuke is a problem because it potentially destabalizes the global stage, not because were worried about NK launching a nuke at anyone (its not going to happen).

ninty 10-10-2006 09:00 PM

The US isn't going after NK because it failed in its foreign policy to stop it from happening, and knows not that they cannot stop them. Maybe getting rid of non-proliferation negotiations was a bad idea afterall.

TGB! 10-10-2006 10:33 PM

Non-proliferation agreements based on blackmail and capitulation - which is exactly what the policy of the Clinton administration was - is NOT a foreign policy plan. Period. This administraiton basically went in and say "Fuck you, youre not holding us hostage. Build your little weapon, and we dare you to use it".

At the end of the day, if a country wants to start a nuclear program - it will. PERIOD. No amount of diplomacy can stop that.

Unknown_Sniper 10-10-2006 11:28 PM

China is not stupid and I dont think they would risk the olympics and many other things that are about ot happen for them to save N. Koreas ass.

Vance 10-11-2006 03:42 AM

China is becoming more and more publically embarrassed by NK. Slowly NK is becoming a self-supporting nation, and they're gonna feel the hurt.

Ninty: We're going after Iran right now because NK has proven (we think) that they have a bomb. Iran does not, yet. Think about it: There are two people that are going to commit suicide by jumping off a bridge. One has already commited and jumped; do you try rescue him, or convince the other potential jumper of stepping down? If you rescue the already-jumped you risk losing the other one as well.

imported_Fluffy_Bunny 10-11-2006 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty
oOo:

I can't make this any clearer. Why would the US go after Iran while NK is much farther along and a much more serious threat obviously if they have tested a nuclear weapon?

I only criticize them when they do moronic things like invade a country that has no nuclear weapons to stop them from using their non existant nuclear weapons.

If the US invaded Iraq to stop them from getting Nuclear weapons, and is threatening Iran to stop them from getting nuclear weapons, why aren't they threatening NK in the same way?

Before Iraq started, I said along with a ton of other people that NK and China seemed like a far bigger threat than Iraq. I believe that NK/China is still a far bigger threat than Iran is, howeevr their being handled in totally opposite ways.

Maybe kus in the first Korean War China & NK whipped not only US azz but the UK/Australia/Canada & some other members of the United Nations. Chinas stance has since changed but I still consider NK being a far bigger problem to control than Iraq or Iran, maybe they realise it's just not worth the invasion.

Doctor Duffy 10-11-2006 11:34 PM

lol, my mom came home today from work and said the north korean chick at work had a fucking pms and tried swinging at the manager...

...rofl, I think this reflects the country in every way

Coleman 10-11-2006 11:54 PM

leave

Vance 10-12-2006 04:53 AM

[quote="Fluffy_Bunny":0854c]Maybe kus in the first Korean War China & NK whipped not only US azz but the UK/Australia/Canada & some other members of the United Nations.[/quote:0854c]
For the sake of pride, nobody whipped anybody's ass in that war. It was a flip-flop match that ended in a stalemate.

Middle 1950 - NK invades

Middle/Late 1950 - NK pushes UN/SK back to what's called the "Pusan perimeter" where about 100 miles of land was still under UN control.

Late 1950 - Incheon landings, UN/SK pushes back NK all the way back up north, and in some parts, to the Chinese border.

Early 1951 - China enters on the NK side. Pushes the UN/SK forces down 2/3 of the way into SK.

1951-53 - UN/SK pushes Chinese and NK back to the 38th parallel - war becomes a standsill until the ceasefire.

Look here's a map. [url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/Korean_war_1950-1953.gif"]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... 0-1953.gif[/url]

elstatec 10-14-2006 08:31 PM

UN seems to be functioning very quick;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p ... 051704.stm

Colonel 10-14-2006 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elstatec
UN seems to be functioning very quick;

... but will do nothing if N. Korea ignores the resolution, and then get mad at the US and the UK if we try to enforce the UN resolution.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.