DION!
 

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/12/02/liberals.html

Yup... the Liberals have a hard on for french dudes.

Good to see, this will gain back a many a votes in Quebec, WHICh we need badly.

Why?

Liberal or Conservative...they all sell this country out and betray its citizens.

That's more of an American thing.

No, it's pretty much a world wide thing.

North American Union will be here soon. Goodbye sovereignty.

The liberals signed the legislation to allow for the NA Union, so if you think their any better than the conservatives, you're mistaken.

I love ninty.

Or never...

The less of 2 evils are the liberals in my book.

Because that makes perfect sense.

ewww, would we have to include Mexico? ed:

you only need to vote between a douche and a turd sandwich.

Ill bet the under on that, it wont happen in my lifetime

Hey Stackem, I sure hope your right.

here's a report done by the council on foreign relations:

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications ... _final.pdf

If you fast forward a few pages they bold all the things that should be done by 2010. This includes increasing the migrant worker population from mexico.

Why do you have minutemen patrolling the border? Because bush won't close the border, because he wants an open north american union.

and for those canadian liberal party lovers here, you will see that this document was signed by John Manley, former liberal cabinet minister and he also ran against paul martin for the leadership of the liberal party a couple years back.

The goal is something similar to the EU.


On the EU:
"Because regulations have direct effect, the individual countries do not need to pass local laws to bring them into effect, and indeed any local laws contrary to the regulation are overruled, as European Union Law is supreme over the laws of the Member States. Member states therefore have to legislate in the light of, and consistently with the requirements of, EU Regulations."

So essentially, the EU gathering approves all laws for the member countries. Thus eliminating the sovereignty of the individual country.

In the north american case, say the US wanted to institute a law, they would ahve to go through the NA union and see if the law is acceptable to the union as a whole, not just the us. Total loss of sovereignty.

This loss of sovereignty means that the people of the specific country no longer have the right to choose what is best for their country. It is no longer what the people want, rather what the union wants.

I'll accept a union with Canadians because they are cool but not Mexico. fuck Mexico

dont have time to read it now. Ill look later but it will never happen, never. The US has nothing to gain and everything to lose

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":353ac]dont have time to read it now. Ill look later but it will never happen, never. The US has nothing to gain and everything to lose[/quote:353ac]

Well they do have one thing to gain...The world will definally like them a lot more...

Still i don't see the point...Canada is the best associate country in the world...and united states is the one they choose to associate with...

so really...everything is perfect.

The Queen says no

[quote="Fluffy_Bunny":a2afc]The Queen says no[/quote:a2afc]
ROYALIST

She isn't dead yet?