![]() |
OMG, IRAN!?!?!
This forum has been dead.
[url=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyid=2007-02-22T163220Z_01_L22475863_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAN-NUCLEAR.xml&src=rss&rpc=22:22d75]Iran defies UN deadline[/url:22d75] [img]http://oybay.wordpress.com/files/2006/07/snl101myersrichman010704.jpg[/img] DISCUSS! |
I say let them have it. If they take care of nuclear equipment like they maintain their aircraft we have nothing to worry about.
|
time to liberate iran
|
[quote="Simo Häyhä":1c780]time to liberate iran[/quote:1c780]Bring Saddam back from the dead, and he'd do wonders for Iran. rock:
|
does anyone have any serious opinions? What does this defiance mean for the UN, who was blatantly defied and did nothing before the whole Iraq mess. What will they do this time?
I think some of the more powerful countries are going to agree on something, either economic pressures, or even multilateral military pressure. I would prefer for this to be solved on a global scale, not just by the United States but it needs to be solved somehow. I don't think Iran with nukes is safe right now and I think the world should step up and do something about it and not let Iran make a mockery of international regulations. |
Noone cares.
If they were gonna do something they probably would have done it by now - You put more pressure on them and they're just going to do it anyway. |
This is one of the most important things going on right now, people care.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":ccc4f]
Quote:
I wasnt talking about real-life people when I said noone cares. Stfu das "im too scared to post more than two words" blitz. |
[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":c592a]
Quote:
Yeah, that seems to be the case. |
While the acquisition of nuclear weapons by any country is troubling, the IAEA, CIA and other says Iran is most likely 10 or more years away from attaining this feat. So while it is serious, I would say the more serious issue to deal with is North Korea and how far their nuclear program has advanced.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle ... 606356.stm |
Still, the main problem with dealing with NK is that they have already obtained the technology. It seems to me that stopping Iran from completing their nuclear program might save us the trouble of having two NK situations in the future.
|
If NK has already obtained the technology and can actually launch a nuke, wouldn't that make them the graver situation by default?
|
Quote:
|
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11233384/
OOOh eek: [quote:a762d]Iran: U.S. not in a position for military action[/quote:a762d] |
Ok, that may be true, but how can Iranian government officials make that qualification?
I don't want to have a war with how much the current one was bungled. I think Iran is a severely troubled country and the human rights issues are of a great concern (Iran is one of the worst Muslim countries as far as shari'a law goes) but I think if they get enough global pressure against them, there won't need to be a war. |
I understand what your saying c312.
British officials are worried also: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070223/wl ... anpolitics |
[quote=Whatada]
Quote:
I still hold strong the idea that Saddam is alive and banging out CD's with Tupac. Hollah bax! |
Quote:
America cant stop Iran, hell look at Iraq what a mess that is |
Quote:
It's been in the press since last year that the pentagon was "secretly" setting military plans against Iran. |
unlikely that it is, but in the smallest possibility America tries to "liberate" Iran then terrorism would most probaly hit the next level.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.