Alliedassault - Edit Sig

It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will surely be considered muddleheaded by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that the similarities between Mr. Cockmongrel Newt and sniffish rubes should not be taken lightly. To start, Mr. Newt's cop-outs are a blatantly obvious and cleverly orchestrated script, carefully concocted to provide the pretext for police-state measures. Let me rephrase that: Like a verbal magician, Mr. Newt knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. In the end, the most telling thing is that when workable solutions to a problem elude you, sometimes it helps to take the initiative to allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by him. That conclusion is not based on some sort of combative, insincere philosophy or on Mr. Newt-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Mr. Newt thinks that pharisaism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. However, it frustrates him that he can't shut me up. Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to illustrate the virtues that he lacks -- courage, truthfulness, courtesy, honesty, diligence, chivalry, loyalty, and industry -- have no right to complain when he and his dupes incite racial hatred. Mr. Newt's older editorials were irrational enough. His latest ones are certainly beyond the pale. My current plan is to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse. Yes, he will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but if you read between the lines of his notions, you'll indisputably find that if he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality -- I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Self-absorbed Rhetoric. In the meantime, if everyone does his own, small part, together we can expose injustice and puncture prejudice.

You might not care that Mr. Newt's new definition of "extraterritoriality" is in disagreement with his sadistic, insufferable sentiments, but you'd better start caring if you don't want Mr. Newt to produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. When all is said and done, his argument that honor counts for nothing is hopelessly flawed and entirely circuitous. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, he is absolutely determined to believe that he is merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Mr. Newt's cause is not glorious. It is not wonderful. It is not good.

One might think that Mr. Newt is a mythmaker, an illusion builder, or to put it less politely, a trickster, and this is, not surprisingly, the case. Don't give his values a credibility they don't deserve. He wants nothing less than to fuel the censorship-and-intolerance crowd. His lapdogs then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with conceited flakes who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that Mr. Newt's commentaries are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us eventually. No matter how bad you think Mr. Newt's offhand remarks are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. Mr. Newt is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that whenever he is presented with the truth, he cringes like a vampire from a cross. If you don't believe me, see for yourself. But it gets much worse than that. However mingy the national picture already is, Mr. Newt refuses to come to terms with reality. He prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination.

He wants to change the course of history. But what if the tables were turned? How would Mr. Newt like that?

I myself find him the most incompetent person in the world. That being the case, we can infer that he decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that Mr. Newt fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. His faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. I assume that Mr. Newt is unaware of his obligation not to sensationalize all of the issues, as this unawareness would be consistent with his prior displays of ignorance. Even if neurotic clumsy-types join his band with the best of intentions, they will still feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear by the next full moon. Not all, I hasten to add, do join with the best of intentions.

It should be clear by this point that he has spent untold hours trying to defile the present and destroy the future. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that he can be so naive, it would take your breath away? Well, we all know the answer to that question, don't we? But in case you don't, then you should note that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to strike at the heart of his efforts to undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, subliminal spam and family. We were not put here to promote, foster, and institute defeatism, as Mr. Newt might believe. All in all, if natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species, then he is clearly going to be the first to go. I like to throw darts at Mr. Newt's picture. Interestingly, Mr. Newt doesn't seem to care about that.

Now, I don't mean for that to sound pessimistic, although to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of repugnant ex-cons, it has to be repeated at least 50 times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following 50 times, but he does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, Mr. Newt discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. There are some truths that are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen, or at least not recognized, by ordinary people. One noteworthy example is the truism that some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with grungy extremists on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to paint pictures of soporific worlds inhabited by pouty, bloodthirsty blusterers.

The vast majority of people would probably be willing to help me show Mr. Newt how he is as wrong as wrong can be. These people simply need information, encouragement, direction, and leadership. In order to convince us that his scribblings prevent smallpox, Mr. Newt often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness he is mongering. We need to speak out against behavior and speech that is intended to censor any incomplicitous treatises. Although the historical battle between good and evil is exemplified in the philosophical division between Platonic order and Aristotelian chaos, Mr. Newt's claim that his harangues enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind.

Mr. Newt's fairy tales are like an enormous interventionism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must provide you with vital information which Mr. Newt has gone to great lengths to prevent you from discovering, because Mr. Newt has been deluding people into believing that cantankerous, frightful lunkheads make the best scout leaders and schoolteachers. Don't let him delude you, too. Nonetheless, if he continues to take us over the edge of the abyss of barbarism, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets.

Rhetoric aside, Mr. Newt's exegeses cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. How many of Mr. Newt's disciples are content to sit around doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the world around them? I'd hazard to guess that the number is pretty high. According to the laws of probability, I myself oppose Mr. Newt's beliefs because they are libidinous. I oppose them because they are profligate. And I oppose them because they will displace meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion within a short period of time. Mr. Newt's lickspittles are deluded at best, the downfall of society at worst, but, as you know, I, not being one of the many lousy, pushy indecent-types of this world, am not trying to save the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to address a number of important issues. And that, in my view, is our real problem.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innoxx

It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will surely be considered muddleheaded by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that the similarities between Mr. Cockmongrel Newt and sniffish rubes should not be taken lightly. To start, Mr. Newt's cop-outs are a blatantly obvious and cleverly orchestrated script, carefully concocted to provide the pretext for police-state measures. Let me rephrase that: Like a verbal magician, Mr. Newt knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. In the end, the most telling thing is that when workable solutions to a problem elude you, sometimes it helps to take the initiative to allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by him. That conclusion is not based on some sort of combative, insincere philosophy or on Mr. Newt-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Mr. Newt thinks that pharisaism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. However, it frustrates him that he can't shut me up. Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to illustrate the virtues that he lacks -- courage, truthfulness, courtesy, honesty, diligence, chivalry, loyalty, and industry -- have no right to complain when he and his dupes incite racial hatred. Mr. Newt's older editorials were irrational enough. His latest ones are certainly beyond the pale. My current plan is to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse. Yes, he will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but if you read between the lines of his notions, you'll indisputably find that if he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality -- I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Self-absorbed Rhetoric. In the meantime, if everyone does his own, small part, together we can expose injustice and puncture prejudice.

You might not care that Mr. Newt's new definition of "extraterritoriality" is in disagreement with his sadistic, insufferable sentiments, but you'd better start caring if you don't want Mr. Newt to produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. When all is said and done, his argument that honor counts for nothing is hopelessly flawed and entirely circuitous. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, he is absolutely determined to believe that he is merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Mr. Newt's cause is not glorious. It is not wonderful. It is not good.

One might think that Mr. Newt is a mythmaker, an illusion builder, or to put it less politely, a trickster, and this is, not surprisingly, the case. Don't give his values a credibility they don't deserve. He wants nothing less than to fuel the censorship-and-intolerance crowd. His lapdogs then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with conceited flakes who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that Mr. Newt's commentaries are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us eventually. No matter how bad you think Mr. Newt's offhand remarks are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. Mr. Newt is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that whenever he is presented with the truth, he cringes like a vampire from a cross. If you don't believe me, see for yourself. But it gets much worse than that. However mingy the national picture already is, Mr. Newt refuses to come to terms with reality. He prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination.

He wants to change the course of history. But what if the tables were turned? How would Mr. Newt like that?

I myself find him the most incompetent person in the world. That being the case, we can infer that he decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that Mr. Newt fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. His faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. I assume that Mr. Newt is unaware of his obligation not to sensationalize all of the issues, as this unawareness would be consistent with his prior displays of ignorance. Even if neurotic clumsy-types join his band with the best of intentions, they will still feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear by the next full moon. Not all, I hasten to add, do join with the best of intentions.

It should be clear by this point that he has spent untold hours trying to defile the present and destroy the future. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that he can be so naive, it would take your breath away? Well, we all know the answer to that question, don't we? But in case you don't, then you should note that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to strike at the heart of his efforts to undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, subliminal spam and family. We were not put here to promote, foster, and institute defeatism, as Mr. Newt might believe. All in all, if natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species, then he is clearly going to be the first to go. I like to throw darts at Mr. Newt's picture. Interestingly, Mr. Newt doesn't seem to care about that.

Now, I don't mean for that to sound pessimistic, although to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of repugnant ex-cons, it has to be repeated at least 50 times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following 50 times, but he does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, Mr. Newt discredits and discards those people who contradict him along Inox sucks balls with the ideas that they represent. There are some truths that are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen, or at least not recognized, by ordinary people. One noteworthy example is the truism that some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with grungy extremists on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to paint pictures of soporific worlds inhabited by pouty, bloodthirsty blusterers.

The vast majority of people would probably be willing to help me show Mr. Newt how he is as wrong as wrong can be. These people simply need information, encouragement, direction, and leadership. In order to convince us that his scribblings prevent smallpox, Mr. Newt often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness he is mongering. We need to speak out against behavior and speech that is intended to censor any incomplicitous treatises. Although the historical battle between good and evil is exemplified in the philosophical division between Platonic order and Aristotelian chaos, Mr. Newt's claim that his harangues enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind.

Mr. Newt's fairy tales are like an enormous interventionism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must provide you with vital information which Mr. Newt has gone to great lengths to prevent you from discovering, because Mr. Newt has been deluding people into believing that cantankerous, frightful lunkheads make the best scout leaders and schoolteachers. Don't let him delude you, too. Nonetheless, if he continues to take us over the edge of the abyss of barbarism, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets.

Rhetoric aside, Mr. Newt's exegeses cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. How many of Mr. Newt's disciples are content to sit around doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the world around them? I'd hazard to guess that the number is pretty high. According to the laws of probability, I myself oppose Mr. Newt's beliefs because they are libidinous. I oppose them because they are profligate. And I oppose them because they will displace meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion within a short period of time. Mr. Newt's lickspittles are deluded at best, the downfall of society at worst, but, as you know, I, not being one of the many lousy, pushy indecent-types of this world, am not trying to save the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to address a number of important issues. And that, in my view, is our real problem.

yeaa... ok inox go wank off with ur girly sigs