I just went and played RTCW and the facial models look very undetailed if you get up close. The MOH ones are far better, check it out for yourself if you don't believe me, have a look at a face through a sniper scope, you'll see up close how much more detail the MOH ones are. However I will admit from a distance the RTCW ones do come of better.

------------------
http://dba.gamepoint.net/images/MOHsig4.jpg

Lady Astor: "Winston, if I were your wife I'd put poison in your coffee."

Winston Churchill: "Nancy, if I were your husband I'd drink it."

no way dude

MOHAA is way best looking than RTCW in all ways.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rudolf_007:
no way dude

MOHAA is way best looking than RTCW in all ways.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Agreed, though the MOH faces do look a little funky from a distance, small gripe but I still prefer them over RTCW's. By the way RTCW feels and looks wierd after playing the MOH SP demo so much. It really does make you realise what a great shooter MOH is. http://www.alliedassault.com/ubb/smile.gif

------------------
http://dba.gamepoint.net/images/MOHsig4.jpg

Lady Astor: "Winston, if I were your wife I'd put poison in your coffee."

Winston Churchill: "Nancy, if I were your husband I'd drink it."

for now, mohaa is one of, if not the best fps game 'out' on the market.

RTCW has better - higher detail textures than MoH, so it looks better than MoH. I guess 2015 did this so more people could play the game. If you don't believe me open up the .pak files and look at the textures...RTCW has bigger textures than MoH leading to higher detail. Although MoH's 'models' are slightly higher in detail.

------------------
My site > http://www.stillborntree.homestead.com

http://alliedassault.righthere.nl/pics/omaha.jpg

I disagree, I run 1024 res with all settings jacked to the max. IMO MoH looks way better than wolf. Just my opinion though...