28 Days Later ...
 

Yes, I finally saw the movie, but why did the main character decide to create chaos, and release the black soldier who was infected, and chained up? Was it so the girls could escape...was it revenge...and why did it say "28 Days Later..." again? Why did they just show the plane flying over head, with the black girl saying did they see it this time, well someone said it...why didn't they keep going, and show what happened, and when the plane was flying over, you see the two infected people under the bridge...they appear to die? But what really happens?

i think you need to watch it again
pause and review in certain areas
oOo:

Stupid people shouldn't watch movies.

Re: 28 Days Later ...
 

ROFL

The black soldier killed all the other soldiers. The girls and the dude were able to escape.

It said 28 days later because it was 28 days later.

They were trying to get the planes attention so maybe they could get some help.

they didn't keep going in the movie because that was the end of the movie. Do you want the movie to be 5 hours long? You can decide what happens from then on. Do they get rescued? Do they get bombed? Or what?

I don't remember two people under the bridge. sorry. been a while since i saw it.

That was a class film! - i personally thought it was very easy to understand!

Re: 28 Days Later ...
 

He released the infected black soldier so he could rescue the girls and get out.

It said 28 days later, because it was 28 days later (like someone said already.)

The plane flew over before, and thats why the girl said "Did they see it this time?"

The people under the bridge die, they starved to death.

I thought the movie sucked ass! annoy: annoy:

[quote="Bleed_4_Me":760ad]I thought the movie sucked ass! annoy: annoy:[/quote:760ad]

I haven't seen it yet! annoy: annoy:

[quote="Bleed_4_Me":eca1a]I thought the movie sucked ass! annoy: annoy:[/quote:eca1a]

Probably because it did.

[quote=Miscguy]Probably because it did.[/quote:27d69]

it did suck....

That's the ending I saw, I heard there were 2 different endings though...

It was a pretty shitty movie, had some good scenes but overall it was a very flat film. Let's see if the new Dawn of the Dead can add to the very short list of "good" zombie films.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0363547/

It was alright and easy to understand.

It sucks

Although it's wierd to see a movie with scenes of London and the characters talking of getting run over 5 mins walk from my university rock: